Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

Anecodtally people I know in NYC who would have gone ballistic a year ago at anything like this are willingly admitting that wokery is bad
Much like something like the French Terror, albeit milder and (as yet) mostly not directly violent, eventually people realize the purity spiral whirlwind is going to come after them some time too. People have to be more afraid of NOT standing up to this bullshit than getting juggernauted by it.
 
Yeah but apart from her off-the-scale successes in the fields of books, films and video games not to mention exceptional charity achievements of which we know only the tip of the iceberg, face it, she is a total loser. Her husband would probably leave her for a troon tomorrow if he didn't love her and he was crazy.

Anyway, she is really not taking prisoners now. o_0

1736124865491.png
 
In almost every discussion I've seen about Neil Gaiman over the last two days, I've seen people comparing JKR and Gaiman as authors that went bad. Driving me nuts - disagreeing with you is not the same as serial rape!!
Violence directed against people they disagree with is speech, speech directed against them is violence. JKR has said a lot of things against them, therefore she's committed countless acts of violence. And so has Neil Gaiman, so that makes them pretty much the same.
 
Última edición:
I hear tidings from America! Some new law banning men from women's sport. Common sense has returned from it's extended holiday and while Lord Trump has surely influenced it's return, I think we can confidently claim our girl JKR was the tip of the spear.
 
Violence directed against people they disagree with is speech, speech directed against them is violence. JKR has said a lot of things against them, therefore she's committed countless acts of violence. And so has Neil Gaiman, so that makes them pretty much the same.
Speech and violence are not the same thing and anyone who thinks they are is retarded.
 
In almost every discussion I've seen about Neil Gaiman over the last two days, I've seen people comparing JKR and Gaiman as authors that went bad. Driving me nuts - disagreeing with you is not the same as serial rape!!
guess what is going on over at tumblr right now:
Ver archivo adjunto 6867580
Ver archivo adjunto 6867581
very stupid website
Speech and violence are not the same thing and anyone who thinks they are is retarded.
Not only has she done nothing except disagree with them, the disagreement is over a matter of objective fact which she is objectively right about.

And that makes her not only evil in their eyes, but a 'predator':
looking1~2.png

It's no exaggeration to say that these lunatics are the enemies of civilization.
 
Not a word about this from David Tennant. He was getting on Rowling for being against transgenderism but when his buddy/show runner is outed as a serial rapist, nothing.

*clicks bottles together* DAAAAAAAaaaaavid! Come out and PLAAAAAAAaaaaay!
Edit: shit spelling
 
Última edición:
Their complete lack of respect for words and the meaning of words never ceases to amaze.
When they use a word, it means exactly what they choose it to mean. Nothing more or less.

Not a word about this from David Tennant. He was getting on Rowling for being against transgenderism but when his buddy/show runner is outted as a serial rapist, nothing.
I'm starting to think Tenant and Gaiman are more of a kind than I had previously thought. They're both neck deep in everything wrong about the media world; it wouldn't surprise me if Tenant is outed as a sex pest as well sooner or later.

As for Gaiman, he's spent the last fifteen or more years coasting on his overt adherence to the political zeitgeist and his vaguely posh accent. He hasn't writte anything good for a long time. I really liked Good Omens, but it was obvious that the best part of the book was Pratchett rather than Gaiman. I wanted to respect Gaiman for insisting that the miniseries remain as true to the books as possible, but at the same time it was obvious that he had no intention to actually stick to that. He's spent too long wallowing in the attention of teenage shippers. All the likely unintentional subtext between Aziraphel and Crowley was made as unsubtle as a brick to the head, while his botched re-write of the ending broke a lot of the underlying themes of the story as a whole. The less said about his retarded sequel, the better.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo