Reuters “Large Scale Social Deception” invoice uncovered by DOGE - but no fair noticing because …it started in 2018?

Trump demands ‘Radical Left Reuters’ return a $9 million government contract. He’s the one who paid it out in the first place​

Justin Baragona
Thu, February 13, 2025 at 11:27 AM EST
5 min read



Donald Trump is raging about the $9 million that “Radical Left Reuters” received to supposedly study “large scale social deception,” demanding that it immediately “give the money back” even though it was awarded during his first administration and was given to a company that operates seperately from the news agency.
The president’s Thursday morning social media tirade comes hours after DOGE chief Elon Muskpeddled a misleading claim on X (formerly Twitter) that Reuters engaged in a “total scam,” sharing a post that alleged the news organization had been paid millions of dollars from the government for a “social engineering” program.
Musk, who has been tasked by the president to dismantle federal agencies and lay off hundreds of thousands of federal workers while slashing “fraud and waste,” took aim at Reuters on Wednesday night shortly after the outlet reported that the majority of his DOGE spending cuts were based on ideology rather than cost-savings.
The administration’s recent attack on Reuters, meanwhile, comes as Trumpworld has sought to not only blow up large swaths of the federal government but also to thoroughly discredit the mainstream media, which has included spreading conspiracy theories that federal aid was propping up legacy press outlets.


“DOGE: Looks like Radical Left Reuters was paid $9,000,000 by the Department of Defense to study “large scale social deception.” GIVE BACK THE MONEY, NOW!” Trump blared on Truth Social on Thursday morning.

“DOGE: Why was Politico paid Millions of Dollars for NOTHING. Buying the press??? PAY BACK THE MONEY TO THE TAXPAYERS! How much has the Failing New York Times paid? Is this the money that is keeping it open??? THEY ARE BUYING THE PRESS,” the president added in another post. (The payments to Politico and the Times were for subscriptions to the outlets’ paid content for government employees.)
“Reuters was paid millions of dollars by the US government for ‘large scale social deception,’” Musk tweeted the night before. “That is literally what it says on the purchase order! They’re a total scam. Just wow.”

The world’s richest man and Trump’s “first buddy” was reacting to a post by Mario Nawfal, a Musk acolyte and conservative social media influencer. According to Nawfal, the Department of Defense had paid Reuters $9 million for a “social engineering” program – something that was uncovered by Musk’s meme-based government efficiency agency.
“DOGE investigations reveal mysterious Defense Department payments to Reuters for "large scale social deception" project between 2018-2022,” he tweeted, citing a federal spending open data source website and frequent Musk reply guy Ian Miles Cheong. “While DARPA claims it was for cyber defense, questions swirl about why a news agency received millions for ‘social engineering.’ The revelation comes as other media outlets face scrutiny over federal funding.”
Nawfal’s post came shortly after Musk seemed put off by a recent Reuters piece, which was shared on X by Hollywood director Ron Howard. “The first phase of the rapid-fire effort by…Elon Musk and President Donald Trump to cut waste from government agencies appears driven more by an ideological assault on federal agencies long hated by conservatives than a good-faith effort to save taxpayer dollars, according to two veteran Republican budget experts,” Reuters noted.

“I wonder how much money Reuters is getting from the government?” Musk replied to Howard’s tweet. “Let’s find out.”
 
the outlet reported that the majority of his DOGE spending cuts were based on ideology rather than cost-savings.
I'd rather be saving money based on ideology than giving it away. The Trump admin payed Reuter's ( or some adjacent related subsidary) 9 mil to do a job, they failed to do it, he wants the money back.
 
I can't stand the language used by these leftwing journalists. They so blatantly come off as assmad redditors. "raging", "tirade", "peddled", "misleading claims", "ideologies", "meme-based government efficiency agency", "Trumpworld". You can disagree with someone and still act like a professional reporter instead of some catty feminine reddit snarker. These people are such fucking faggots lmao
 
It's his fault they squandered it?
Yes.
He was in charge at the time, it is his fault.
Large scale Decepticon?

You mean like one of those big robots that's made from six smaller ones?
Reuters be like:
i-am-directly-below-the-enemy-scrotum.gif
 
I can't stand the language used by these leftwing journalists. They so blatantly come off as assmad redditors. "raging", "tirade", "peddled", "misleading claims", "ideologies", "meme-based government efficiency agency", "Trumpworld". You can disagree with someone and still act like a professional reporter instead of some catty feminine reddit snarker. These people are such fucking faggots lmao
Every article is a barely disguised opinion piece.
 
All these paragraphs, and no one checked that it was a DARPA project to defend against cyber attacks. It is listed under Active Social Engineering Defense.

One of these day Musk will get an active contract terminated by a very powerful contractor and it will not end well for him, either legally or in Minecraft.
Should I really be happy with the federal government’s actions over the last decade vis a vis social engineering?
 
Should I really be happy with the federal government’s actions over the last decade vis a vis social engineering?
The problem is that people are being manipulated without the government’s actions as seen with this incident.

The DARPA link I have above outright says what they mean by social engineering.

We call attacks on humans “social engineering” because they manipulate or “engineer” users into performing desired actions or divulging sensitive information. The most general social engineering attacks simply attempt to get unsuspecting internet users to click on malicious links.
ASED is a cybersecurity program to prevent tech-illiterate employees from getting information stolen or from being hacked.

That’s all this was. Yet a bunch of the online right-wing, Elon Musk, and the President of the United States saw the term”social engineering” and concluded that it must be some insidious Deep State project to do something malicious.

Taking five minutes to just look up the contract and research the program clears all of this up.
 
Still garbage spending.

Dumb IT workers won't follow it, smart ones don't need to hear it, and the program probably cost eight times as much and employs four times the management it needs to accomplish it's goal anyway.

A single circular with 10 easy tips on it printed once a year would have the same overall effect on US IT security at 1/1,000,000 the cost. Like the online module I have to pass once a year that reminds you how to spot a phishing email. Complete with your ISO 9000 strong black girlboss and hajib-wearer-of-peace being the helpful "experts" pointing out how "$9000 for you Saar if send redeem!" in a subject line is probably not legit.... WHO KNEW?
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo