💊 Manosphere Return of Kings and Roosh V

Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Just in case one of the redpillers decides to go tomgirl.

Also, there's quite a bit of irony to be found in the fact that these people gripe about how "women are inferior and simplistic" using computer and internet technology which wouldn't exist without some of these oh-so-simplistic women.

I seriously want the opinion of those sad fuckers about Grace Hopper. I know they'll say "Men still helped her to find that moth". Still, I want to know what they'll say about Hopper, Lovelace, and Bartik. I doubt the opinions will be unbiased.
 
Here are a few excerpts from the computer simulation article that are interesting and worthy of a chuckle (not in a good way).

I knew this kind of thing couldn’t be understood with simple linear mathematics. So I decided to construct a computer simulation to uncover the secrets of this inherently strange phenomenon. I set out to devise an agent-based model, which is a simple computer simulation comprised of programmable “objects,” and then change things such as the wealth distribution and ecological state of the “environment” in the simulation. My hypothesis? Simple: as I adjusted the freedom of women to choose their mating partners, they would rapidly and aggressively seek out the men with the greatest social status. I also hypothesized that this would come at the expense of long-run social utility.

The interesting thing about agent-based models is that all you do is start with a few simple rules, hit “Go,” and watch as the objects collide and interact. They’re very easy to learn. Unlike regular mathematical models, these simulations generate outcomes which are highly unanticipated, where small differences in initial configurations can lead to dramatically divergent global properties. The only way to test your hypothesis is to press play and watch your simulated reality unfold. So I endowed my “agents” with a few simple albeit realistic rules, and I watched as hell broke loose:



Dominant Rule: If female (pink), seek out highest-value male (blue) in vicinity, attempt to initiate relationship. If rejected, move to next available space, rinse and repeat. Only stop when every other agent is currently in a relationship.

Dominant Parameter: “Hypergamy,” or the extent to which a female agent’s vicinity is defined. As the hypergamy scale increases, her ability to jump from patch to patch in order to seek relatively higher males expands. This is to say that a higher value of hypergamy, due perhaps to technologies, such as internet dating and mobile phones, or political freedoms such as divorce without legal recourse, leads to a better “search” algorithm, so that the female is no longer trapped to males in her vicinity. At the highest levels of this parameter, she is essentially limitless in her options.


The result? In a world where hypergamy is high (right screen), the society’s resources are almost completely annihilated, as men allocate most of their assets to consumption in a sad attempt to satisfy choosy women (resulting also in overpopulation). In a world where hypergamy is low (left screen), the society’s resources are more equally distributed, vast reserves of wealth (savings) pocket the landscape, and population growth hovers at a sustainable level.

Why is this all happening? Well, to be blunt, women, when given too much freedom, cause society to become volatile and thus unsustainable. This is why many cultures, and especially those living in marginal desert communities (where a single fuck-up can spell the doom of an entire tribe), practice things like clitoral circumcision, concealment of the body, betrothal, and a whole host of other customs which prevent poor behaviors.

 
(Looks at NMS's spergfest)

It's funny, I give advice on how to not be a "nice guy" and people seemed to like it or at the very least, not think it's autistic to hell.

Maybe it's all in the presentation?
 
(Looks at NMS's spergfest)

It's funny, I give advice on how to not be a "nice guy" and people seemed to like it or at the very least, not think it's autistic to hell.

Maybe it's all in the presentation?
Not telling a woman who's just discussed her traumatic past relationships that what she really wants is rough sex can do wonders for whether people will hear you out :)
 
Not telling a woman who's just discussed her traumatic past relationships that what she really wants is rough sex can do wonders for whether people will hear you out :)
Yea right. People were hating on my posts long before that, and you can go back many pages and see the same thing. There are like two people who agree with me, and then a bunch of typical white knight faggotry as expected. Of course presentation is important, but the issue always comes down to "muh generalizations." I can post about why generalizations are important, AGAIN but it will always end up in the same place. I know I made a lot of people mad, but my intention wasn't to make anybody upset or anything like that. Sometimes I truly don't understand how these messages get taken so far out of context, especially because I acknowledge and understand all sides. Someone told me to read my posts to a mirror, as if this really was just some autistic ramblings, but I live what I write about, and it goes much deeper than whatever labels you want to put on it.
I always get surprised when people react to my opinions because it truly just seems sensible to me. I think people want to believe I feel a certain way about something when I don't. I really just don't understand the strong emotional backlash on my posts when we can discuss any number of other topics rationally.
Do people not agree with anything I wrote, at all or do they look for one point they can use to discredit the entire thing as "misogyny?" Is it possible to admit we agree on certain things, but disagree on other parts?
Would you have the audacity to tell me all the girls i've dated and hooked up with have been whores with no self respect because they got with a "douchebag" like me? What is it?

I hope I don't get banned for this post, because I really do like this forum for a number of reasons. But I really am surprised that people reacted this way on here.

And also, Pine Tar, not all women are the same and they aren't your personal chef whenever you need a sandwich.

RESPONSE TO POSTS BELOW:
Post in different threads than.
But I find this topic very interesting, which should be obvious. Sorry my opinion on the subject is different than yours, because the entire point of the internet is for everyone to agree with each other and never question anything.

PS when I said I was sorry a couple lines above, I was being sarcastic.

I'm sure the women you've hooked up with are Jill, Rose Palmer and Rose's five sisters.
I don't get the joke, but if it's about masturbation I actually don't fap at all. The science on the benefits of "no fap" always give mixed results from survey to survey, but some people swear by it and i've definitely noticed a change personally. To talk about the girls I've dated would be stupid, and send the wrong message. Plus this is the internet and people will remind me that "this is the internet" and i'll only get accused of lying. Like it's so unbelievable. You don't know me at all, and if you did, you would understand.

PS you don't have even a shred of the relationship experience I have, and probably never will. I know you have all types of cool reasons why it doesn't matter, and how your relationships were better than mine for this and that reason - but I wasn't calling out yours or anybodies sexual history in my posts.
 
Última edición:
Yea right. People were hating on my posts long before that, and you can go back many pages and see the same thing. There are like two people who agree with me, and then a bunch of typical white knight faggotry as expected. Of course presentation is important, but the issue always comes down to "muh generalizations." I can post about why generalizations are important, AGAIN but it will always end up in the same place. I know I made a lot of people mad, but my intention wasn't to make anybody upset or anything like that. Sometimes I truly don't understand how these messages get taken so far out of context, especially because I acknowledge and understand all sides. Someone told me to read my posts to a mirror, as if this really was just some autistic ramblings, but I live what I write about, and it goes much deeper than whatever labels you want to put on it.
I always get surprised when people react to my opinions because it truly just seems sensible to me. I think people want to believe I feel a certain way about something when I don't. I really just don't understand the strong emotional backlash on my posts when we can discuss any number of other topics rationally.
Do people not agree with anything I wrote, at all or do they look for one point they can use to discredit the entire thing as "misogyny?" Is it possible to admit we agree on certain things, but disagree on other parts?
Would you have the audacity to tell me all the girls i've dated and hooked up with have been whores with no self respect because they got with a "douchebag" like me? What is it?

I hope I don't get banned for this post, because I really do like this forum for a number of reasons. But I really am surprised that people reacted this way on here.

And also, Pine Tar, not all women are the same and they aren't your personal chef whenever you need a sandwich.

RESPONSE TO POST BELOW:

But I find this topic very interesting, which should be obvious. Sorry my opinion on the subject is different than yours, because the entire point of the internet is for everyone to agree with each other and never question anything.

PS when I said I was sorry a couple lines above, I was being sarcastic.

I'm sure the women you've hooked up with are Jill, Rose Palmer and Rose's five sisters.
 
Why does "NoMoreSleeping" seem more like someone we should be discussing on this forum, than someone who's discussing other people with us? I'm looking forward to him getting banned and someone starting a thread about him.

Also, I call bullshit on his "I'm constantly getting laid, so I must be right" crap, both the "constantly getting laid" part and the "being right" part.

NoMoreSleeping dijo:
Would you have the audacity to tell me all the girls i've dated and hooked up with have been whores with no self respect because they got with a "douchebag" like me? What is it?

Assuming these girls actually exist (and that's a biiiiig assumption), then no. I don't call them whores. I think they have issues that leave them vulnerable that you're taking advantage of. Being manipulative is nothing to be proud of.

BTW I really, really hate being mean to people like this, but you're driving everyone nuts.
 
Why does "NoMoreSleeping" seem more like someone we should be discussing on this forum, than someone who's discussing other people with us? I'm looking forward to him getting banned and someone starting a thread about him.

Also, I call bullshit on his "I'm constantly getting laid, so I must be right" crap, both the "constantly getting laid" part and the "being right" part.



Assuming these girls actually exist (and that's a biiiiig assumption), then no. I don't call them whores. I think they have issues that leave them vulnerable that you're taking advantage of. Being manipulative is nothing to be proud of.

BTW I really, really hate being mean to people like this, but you're driving everyone nuts.

Give it time and he'll join the illustrious ranks of jcrowley, Peppy and others who we have found to be lolcows in our midst. Seriously, the guy's been at this for what, 10+ pages? We're not interested in red-pill ideology or really any ideology. We just want to laugh. And that's the last I'll pay attention to this euphoric gent.
 
Being manipulative is nothing to be proud of.

BTW I really, really hate being mean to people like this, but you're driving everyone nuts.
Please cite an example of me using a manipulative tactic.
And damn man, I know i'm driving everyone nuts but I'm not trying too. I can't let people misquote and put words in my mouth though. If you don't respond to my posts I won't have anything else to say.

But look, I'll stop posting ITT. So say whatever you want.
I'm sorry you feel that way about girls, but it's ok. I'm sure you'll find the special one for you some day.

PS I do not advocate PUA, you just want believe I do.
Much earlier ITT I wrote my thoughts on PUA if you are actually curious, but it's all good.
 
Última edición:
If you don't respond to my posts I won't have anything else to say.
I wasn't going to say anything because you having nothing to say sounds good but...

I'm sorry you feel that way about girls, but it's ok. I'm sure you'll find the special one for you some day.
What are you talking about? I didn't say anything about girls in general, just the ones who fall for the kind of Pick-up-artist crap you advocate.

And, for the record I have a girlfriend, and I'm pretty happy with her.
 
So the Null Alarm went off and I went into this thread to figure out a few things.

1) What was happening.
2) Who the aggressor was.
3) If it was a case of people being oversensitive, or if someone was being a real jerk.

And after glancing over everything I haven't found an answer to fucking anything.

Sometimes I truly don't understand how these messages get taken so far out of context
Because you don't know how to write. You don't convey ideas. Everything about this thread was a really autistic blur.

Can anyone explain what happened? Quote some shit for me.
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo