Restaurant refuses service to Christian group, citing staff ‘dignity’

A restaurant in Richmond last week canceled a reservation for a private event being held by a conservative Christian organization, citing the group’s opposition to same-sex marriage and abortion rights.

“We have always refused service to anyone for making our staff uncomfortable or unsafe and this was the driving force behind our decision,” read an Instagram post from Metzger Bar and Butchery, a German-influenced restaurant in the Union Hill neighborhood whose kitchen is helmed by co-owner Brittanny Anderson, a veteran of TV cooking shows including “Top Chef” and “Chopped.” “Many of our staff are women and/or members of the LGBTQ+ community. All of our staff are people with rights who deserve dignity and a safe work environment. We respect our staff’s established rights as humans and strive to create a work environment where they can do their jobs with dignity, comfort and safety.”

The group, the Family Foundation, was set to host a dessert reception for supporters on Nov. 30, the group’s president, Victoria Cobb, wrote in a blog post describing the incident. About an hour and a half before it was slated to start, one of the restaurant’s owners called to cancel it, she wrote. “As our VP of Operations explained that guests were arriving at their restaurant shortly, she asked for an explanation,” Cobb wrote. “Sure enough, an employee looked up our organization, and their wait staff refused to serve us.”

The Family Foundation is based in Richmond and advocates for “policies based on biblical principles.” It has lobbied against same-sex marriage and abortion rights.

In an interview, Cobb said that since she posted about it, she has heard from people alarmed by the story and from other dining establishments making it clear they would be welcome. “A lot of people are outraged that a restaurant wants to make a litmus test at the door,” she said. “Everyone should be concerned that people are being denied service based on their politics.”

In her blog post, Cobb likened the restaurant’s move to establishments that refused to serve Black customers in the 1950s and ’60s, and she decried what she called a “double standard” by liberals who think a Colorado baker should not be allowed to refuse to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple.

Legal experts say neither of those are apt analogies. While it’s illegal to discriminate against someone because of their race or religion, the restaurant’s refusal had to do with the group’s actions, said Elizabeth Sepper, a professor at the University of Texas. “It’s about the overall positions and policies the group has taken — it’s not about Christian vs. non-Christian,” she said. According to the American Civil Liberties Union, D.C., Seattle and the Virgin Islands specifically protect people from being refused service because of their political affiliation or ideology.

Reached by phone, Metzger co-owner Kjell Anderson said the owners had no comment beyond the Instagram post.

Restaurants have made news for taking issue with their patrons’ politics. Sarah Sanders, then the White House press secretary and now the governor-elect of Arkansas, was asked to leave the Red Hen in Lexington, Va., in 2018. The owner of the restaurant, Stephanie Wilkinson, wrote that she thought Sanders was “a person whose actions in the service of our country we felt violated basic standards of humanity.” And a judge in 2018 sided with a New York bar that ejected a customer for wearing a “Make America Great Again” hat in support of President Donald Trump.

If past is prologue, Metzger’s move — which was first reported by Virginia Business — is likely to bring it both criticism and support. Wilkinson described the aftermath of the incident with Sanders — which made headlines around the world — as intense. Her phone lines were hacked, she and her staff had private information about them posted online, and many of them received death threats. People took to Yelp, leaving fake negative reviews, and made reservations they had no intention of keeping. But Wilkinson said people also showed their support by driving in from miles away and by donating to local charities.

As of Tuesday, Metzger’s Yelp page was frozen and an “Unusual Activity Alert” was added. “This business recently received increased public attention, which often means people come to this page to post their views on the news,” the notice reads. “While we don’t take a stand one way or the other when it comes to this incident, we’ve temporarily disabled the posting of content to this page as we work to investigate whether the content you see here reflects actual consumer experiences rather than the recent events.”

The restaurant and the foundation used interest in the event to fundraise. Metzger on Saturday posted an image of a bourbon-based cocktail dubbed “Cracks in the Foundation” and said it would donate the profits from its sale to Equality Virginia, a group that advocates for LGBTQ rights. “We are so grateful to our many guests and neighbors for their support the past few days!” read the Instagram post. “To say thank you we are donating all proceeds from this cocktail to @equalityva tonight!”

And in its blog post describing the incident, the Family Foundation sought donations, too. “Will you consider a donation today to support our efforts to ensure that no Virginian will ever have to worry about being refused a simple meal because of his or her religious beliefs?” the post read.

 
Última edición por un moderador:
Unsafe? Unsafe? I'm so sick of that word being misused. What exactly are the employees afraid of? I could see being afraid of someone who walks in waving a gun, or who yells threats at you. But the employees weren't feeling "unsafe."
It’s to allow a disproportionate response. Yet again, it’s a tactic straight out of the abusive person handbook. Your words justify their violence. Thus your polite disagreement is couched by them in terms of being unsafe etc because that allows them to respond violently. If they acknowledged that words should be met with words then they’d never be able to react like they do. That’s why your words kill a million trannies a year and are unsafe.
 
That sucks, it is their right but it's probably better you don't give them money anyway. The one thing I do find unsettling is that they waited until literally just before the event was about to begin before they did this. Shit move.

This is why you don't hire letter people or prog women.. They now refuse to work over things they disagree with and the media will 100% side with them if you try to force the issue.

Also I see people bringing up the gay wedding cake.. While it's somewhat applicable here, there are some differences. The biggest being that the bakery wasn't refusing service to the couple, only a specialty made/designed cake. (which wasn't a normal part of their service and taken as available in terms of both other orders and free time) It should also not be forgotten that they are STILL legally attacking that bakery and trying to ruin it to this day. Not to mention that in any other western country, the baker would not only have lost but probably been punished, maybe even criminally.. and this restaurant would still have no issues, legal or otherwise, for doing this.
 
It has replaced the word 'uncomfortable' because it makes them feel more powerful through victimization if they can pretend people disagreeing with them makes them scared.
It's also replaced the word 'annoyed', because along with the good explanations already offered, these people complaining are really just annoyed. That someone they think of as evil dares to be in their presence, expecting to be treated like another human being, they find annoying, and they are mentally incapable of sucking it up.
 
And in my experience the only worse tippers than niggers were christians who looked down on us for working to serve them on the holy day, and worse than not tipping would leave those fake "$20 on one side Bible verse on the other" things.

And nigger church groups? Well we had people quit rather than serve them.
And then everyone on the bus clapped?
 
To the libertarians who said this was fine, we don't currently live in your pretend libertarian utopia where business owners have the right to do this or every alternative case that doesn't favor leftards wouldn't be currently highly illegal. So yeah STFU and support the Christian group suing the shit out of this restaurant or expect the slipperly slope to get worse.

Saying you're not discriminating against a religion, just their religious beliefs is fucking absurd and these people should have every last penny stolen from them for thinking this Jim Crow level bullshit is acceptable. It would be like me kicking Mulsim customers out of my business because I don't like how their idelogy treats women. Tough rocks, that's not how religious liberty works in our society.
 
Would waiting until the last minute to cancel qualify as breach of contract?
If I'm reading their statement correctly, this was the result of an employee revolt. I don't believe that for a second, but that's what they say.

That's probably the out they colluded to make sure was airtight. Proving otherwise costs more than it's worth and they know it.
 
I really wish this group was a herd of black women, large and in charge, filled with the Holy Spirit.

Or hell, just one. I guess this is a case where diversity would have been their strength,
 
Atrás
Top Abajo