Renewables overtake coal as world's biggest source of electricity - However, Coal is still King in the US and EU

Link: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2rz08en2po
Credit: Justin Rowlatt, BBC Climate Editor
Archive: https://archive.ph/8lf3M

9d78fac0-a2e4-11f0-ba2e-7d74c4f6f1cb.jpg.webp

Renewable energy overtook coal as the world's leading source of electricity in the first half of this year - a historic first, according to new data from the global energy think tank Ember.

Electricity demand is growing around the world but the growth in solar and wind was so strong it met 100% of the extra electricity demand, even helping drive a slight decline in coal and gas use.

However, Ember says the headlines mask a mixed global picture.

Developing countries, especially China, led the clean energy charge but richer nations including the US and EU relied more than before on planet-warming fossil fuels for electricity generation.

Coal, a major contributor to global warming, was still the world's largest individual source of energy generation in 2024, a position it has held for more than 50 years, according to the International Energy Agency.

China remains way ahead in clean energy growth, adding more solar and wind capacity than the rest of the world combined. This enabled the growth in renewable generation in China to outpace rising electricity demand and helped reduce its fossil fuel generation by 2%.

India experienced slower electricity demand growth and also added significant new solar and wind capacity, meaning it too cut back on coal and gas.

In contrast, developed nations like the US, and also the EU, saw the opposite trend.

In the US, electricity demand grew faster than clean energy output, increasing reliance on fossil fuels, while in the EU, months of weak wind and hydropower performance led to a rise in coal and gas generation.

93ddfbd0-a2be-11f0-8b38-691926760cd4.jpg.webp

'Crucial' turning point​


Despite these regional differences, Ember calls this moment a "crucial turning point".

Ember senior analyst Malgorzata Wiatros-Motyka said it "marks the beginning of a shift where clean power is keeping pace with demand growth".

Solar power delivered the lion's share of growth, meeting 83% of the increase in electricity demand. It has now been the largest source of new electricity globally for three years in a row.

Most solar generation (58%) is now in lower-income countries, many of which have seen explosive growth in recent years.

That's thanks to spectacular reductions in cost. Solar has seen prices fall a staggering 99.9% since 1975 and is now so cheap that large markets for solar can emerge in a country in the space of a single year, especially where grid electricity is expensive and unreliable, says Ember.

Pakistan, for example, imported solar panels capable of generating 17 gigawatts (GW) of solar power in 2024, double the previous year and the equivalent of roughly a third of the country's current electricity generation capacity.

Africa is also experiencing a solar boom with panel imports up 60% year on year, in the year to June. Coal-heavy South Africa led the way, while Nigeria overtook Egypt into second place with 1.7GW of solar generating capacity - that's enough to meet the electricity demand of roughly 1.8m homes in Europe.

Some smaller African nations have seen even more rapid growth with Algeria increasing imports 33-fold, Zambia eightfold and Botswana sevenfold.

In some countries the growth of solar has been so rapid it is creating unexpected challenges.

In Afghanistan, widespread use of solar-powered water pumps is lowering the water table, threatening long-term access to groundwater. A study by Dr David Mansfield and satellite data firm Alcis warns that some regions could run dry within five to ten years, endangering millions of livelihoods.

Adair Turner, chair of the UK's Energy Transitions Commission, says countries in the global "sun belt" and "wind belt" face very different energy challenges.

Sun belt nations - including much of Asia, Africa, and Latin America - need large amounts of electricity for daytime air conditioning. These countries can significantly reduce energy costs almost immediately by adopting solar-based systems, supported by increasingly affordable batteries that store energy from day to night.

Wind belt countries like the UK face tougher obstacles, however. Wind turbine costs have not come down by anything like as much as solar panels - down just a third or so in the last decade. Higher interest rates have also added to borrowing costs and raised the overall price of installing wind farms significantly in the last few years.

Balancing supply is harder too: winter wind lulls can last for weeks, requiring backup power sources that batteries alone can't provide - making the system more expensive to build and run.

But wherever you are in the world, China's overwhelming dominance in clean tech industries remains unchallenged, other new data from Ember shows.

In August 2025, its clean tech exports hit a record $20bn, driven by surging sales of electric vehicles (up 26%) and batteries (up 23%). Together, China's electric vehicles and batteries are now worth more than twice the value of its solar panel exports.
 
Renewable energy overtook coal as the world's leading source of electricity in the first half of this year - a historic first, according to new data from the global energy think tank Ember.
How badly did they fudge the numbers, and buy CCP propaganda and magic accounting, to make the data say this?
In contrast, developed nations like the US, and also the EU, saw the opposite trend.

In the US, electricity demand grew faster than clean energy output, increasing reliance on fossil fuels, while in the EU, months of weak wind and hydropower performance led to a rise in coal and gas generation.
"In contrast, the US and the EU told the truth and didn't blatantly lie like the rest of the world" is the actual conclusion here.
 
Renewables are good for powering remote pumps in african villages or keeping small communities off the grid.

On a large, industrial scale it's an ecological disaster leading to eyesores like this:

Ver archivo adjunto 8007937
I mean its also location things like this should be built in the middle of the desert with just enough water to keep things cool. The fact California is shutting down its solar field in the middle of the desert while the chinks have no issues getting power load is a sign that we have morons at the helm of our energy production who are all in on green identity.
 
How badly did they fudge the numbers, and buy CCP propaganda and magic accounting, to make the data say this?

"In contrast, the US and the EU told the truth and didn't blatantly lie like the rest of the world" is the actual conclusion here.
It's either outright fudging or misleading deacriptor of the data they are using.
For example, you could make 'renewables' seem much more useful if you compared installed capacity and mentioning that 'renewables' will have a much lower rate of power delivered over a unit of time.
 
I mean its also location things like this should be built in the middle of the desert with just enough water to keep things cool. The fact California is shutting down its solar field in the middle of the desert while the chinks have no issues getting power load is a sign that we have morons at the helm of our energy production who are all in on green identity.
conveniently ignoring that those same solar farms were immolating birds nonstop
 
I mean its also location things like this should be built in the middle of the desert with just enough water to keep things cool. The fact California is shutting down its solar field in the middle of the desert while the chinks have no issues getting power load is a sign that we have morons at the helm of our energy production who are all in on green identity.
You're spot on the money and it's what irks me about green energy; excellent technology, terrible implementation.

Bang 1 million solar panels near a desalination plant and have it pump fresh water into any dry, arid region and turn it into a farm land/marsh. Use the power to power drones to sow, seed and monitor fields. Use the free (subisidsed) energy in places where power is hard to come by, food is scarce and water is almost non existant.

We talk about terraforming Mars and the Moon, we talk about saving millions of equator-livers from starvation and we can, yet we don't, then fart huff about how good the tech is.
 
How badly did they fudge the numbers, and buy CCP propaganda and magic accounting, to make the data say this?

"In contrast, the US and the EU told the truth and didn't blatantly lie like the rest of the world" is the actual conclusion here.
It sounds like what they mean is there was more renewable power coming online than any other source.
 
How badly did they fudge the numbers, and buy CCP propaganda and magic accounting, to make the data say this?
It's pretty simple. They go off installed nameplate capacity rather than actual production.

Based on installed capacity, the UK has around 30GW of wind and 18GW of solar. Actual production is usually around 7-9GW wind and 3-4GW solar, or about 10-20% of nameplate, with occasional peaks, often less than 30 minutes, that let it briefly claim to be producing more energy than gas or coal. This is typical anywhere you look. They say some new wind or solar farm has gone up, capable of "powering some several thousand homes" or with a nominal capacity of so many MW or GW, but they never tell you that it will typically produce only a fraction of that claimed capacity. The reality is, to replace the existing production capacity of gas, coal, and nuclear, you'd have to overbuild about 4 times the capacity you actually need. Even then, it only appears to work in the averages; if the wind isn't blowing, it doesn't matter how many turbines you have, because they aren't going to spin.
 
You're spot on the money and it's what irks me about green energy; excellent technology, terrible implementation.

Bang 1 million solar panels near a desalination plant and have it pump fresh water into any dry, arid region and turn it into a farm land/marsh. Use the power to power drones to sow, seed and monitor fields. Use the free (subisidsed) energy in places where power is hard to come by, food is scarce and water is almost non existant.

We talk about terraforming Mars and the Moon, we talk about saving millions of equator-livers from starvation and we can, yet we don't, then fart huff about how good the tech is.
Again the problem is the implementation os done at the behest of teams large government organizations and weird backdoor deals that just don't make sense. In short our leaders are partisan hacks and morons who shutter shit to own the libs/chuds.
conveniently ignoring that those same solar farms were immolating birds nonstop
Thats why these solar farms are great if you build them out in the desert, build certain things that basically tell migratory birds if you go hear its probably death. I mean at the end of the day in a place with little to no cloud cover.
The issue of these places is that if they do produce energy en masse and your storage capacity is done its almost always wasted by a state like California with their mismanagement. Also it might be hard to hear but all the morey is on AI right now because our elites have convinced themselves that humans and humanity doesnt really matter because they're this weird intersection of trans humanists and anti humanists. Its crazy to think how alike the Larry fink and Peter Thiel are alike.
This is why there future is going to be trans rights and we need ai to replace well paid workers for the better of society.
 
Cool how there was no science in the article.

Anyway, coal still has the absolute highest caloric potential of any known substance that is practical

Coal, a major contributor to global warming,
The globe isn't warming. The is whole "burning coal makes the world hot" thing is something a 6 year old would think of, I cant believe people believe it

Id love to hear their rationalization on how that's supposed to work
 
"Developing country" (so they don't have to follow regulations!) China is so good and clean and awesome, while filthy westerners lead the world in planet destroying use of coal. Nice propaganda BBC, check's in the mail.
 
China remains way ahead in clean energy growth, adding more solar and wind capacity than the rest of the world combined. This enabled the growth in renewable generation in China to outpace rising electricity demand and helped reduce its fossil fuel generation by 2%.
Uh...wait so you covered the hills in solar panels and only were able to stop using 2% of your fossil fuel generators?
India experienced slower electricity demand growth and also added significant new solar and wind capacity, meaning it too cut back on coal and gas.
But we don't even have a number for it. Curious.
It's probably less than 1%
 
This is good news for Wales. Due to this, the Aberpergwm Colliery will remain open continuing the most meaningful expression of the culture of Wales. According to prophecy, if Wales ever ceases to mine its sacred coal, St. David will open his tomb and kill everyone in Wales including the sheep.
Cwmbargoed/Ffos-y-Fran needs to remain open too.

TRUMP COAL

MWMA

Make Wales Mine Again

As for cultural exports from this great land:

 
Developing countries, especially China, led the clean energy charge but richer nations including the US and EU relied more than before on planet-warming fossil fuels for electricity generation.

Coal, a major contributor to global warming, was still the world's largest individual source of energy generation in 2024, a position it has held for more than 50 years, according to the International Energy Agency.

China remains way ahead in clean energy growth, adding more solar and wind capacity than the rest of the world combined. This enabled the growth in renewable generation in China to outpace rising electricity demand and helped reduce its fossil fuel generation by 2%.
tell me you suck the ccp's cock without tell me.

I'll quote myself
in an 8 year span (2014-2021), china has done as much pollution with CO2 than the whole of the UK in 220 years (1750-2021). 83 billion tons of CO2 vs the uk's 79 billion tons of CO2. if the math is correct, China will have polluted about 36.3125 to date since that report was released.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/environ...n-eight-years-uk-since-industrial-revolution/
 
Atrás
Top Abajo