I really haven't heard Nick say anything catholic spergging wise that I, a person who is not even a christian, do not know. Certain things like bible stories are naturally inundated in western culture and history thus get referenced and used as allegories regardless of if you follow them or not. The same can be said for basics of christian morality. There is societal shame around things that don't exist in my other culture (gayness being one of them). Other things like mensturation, sex, nudity, purpose in life, children, virginity, etc. Are viewed differently in the Anglosphere. I find his assertions of "going back to christian America" kind of misguided because Christianity (specifically the tards who were so insufferable the Br*tish didn't even want them) is already the founding religion for our society. Despite the REEEE-ing all sects of Christians do amongst one another, you're all Christian and thus almost all of the values transfer over.
Well all of it is kind of dumb.
Nietzsche was right when he warned about the direction of the world and how the idea of an Abrahamic god would cease to be applicable to the modern day, and how society was not adequately preparing itself for the modern era. All these systems and ideas these retards cling to because they worked in the past don't work today because we don't live in the fucking year 1800.
In 1776, there were 2.5 million people in the world. We're close to 8 billion now. That means there are now roughly
3,200 people alive for every one person who was alive when the US was founded. The population of the world has tripled in just the last 70 years, since the end of WWII.
These individuals seem to tangentially grasp that the world is different, but their heads don't seem to wrap around the idea of how different it is, that technological and social change tends to increase exponentially, not linearly.
These moral and religious systems worked back when there were insular communities and you weren't having momentary interactions with a hundred different strangers a day being supported by mechanisms run entirely by people you've never met that you don't understand or have power over. We are no longer at a point where anybody can tell you how to move forward.
Again, that is the Nietzschian idea of the new man, someone who's driven by their connection to nature on a primal level and to life itself rather than by the idea of ideological community or an afterlife.
That's why all this nonsense is so absurd, desperate pitiful people crying in the shadows hoping someone will come and save them, or if they just look at the past they'll be given the answers since it worked back then so it must work now, right?! If I just intellectualize and grope enough something will save me and give me the key, and they won't, no politicians, no scientists, no book, and certainly no fucking intellectually stunted catboy faggot on the internet. Every one of us is going to have to figure it out for ourselves.
While your average normal person in America might have their values and worldview formed by at least some kind of Christian milieu, those aren't the people who hold the reins of power and culture creation in America. There are some very big names, but they're not the ones who decide where the culture and policy is going. Those are the very heavily gatekept entertainment, big tech, and media industries. They decide what the respectable upper-middle-class consensus is, which is essentially just whatever the current platform of the Democratic party happens to be. In states where that's not achievable, they put up the Republicans as controlled opposition whose job it is to lose on social issues in the long run.
It's not enough to just have a vaguely nondenominational "Christian" milieu. Without a specific doctrine and sound arguments for it, all America has is an inherited habit of vague Christian feeling. Those feelings can be educated out of the youth in only a generation or two, which is what has happened now. More than a third of Americans under 30 are religiously unaffiliated. Among the rest, a huge chunk of those are the kinds of people who adapt their idea of "Christianity" to whatever's currently fashionable in the secular progressive world. The Rockefellers had a specific hand in the liberalization of mainline Protestantism with guys like Fosdick back in the day. The "social gospel" types.
The way to Christianize a nation is by converting people, though. Not by hunting for semen on people's couches.
Oh right, it's just a ploy. People are just such helpless braindead sheeple they can't see that if they only read the bible and prayed more everything would be fixed, unlike you folks, you can see the truth! You've broken the conditioning!
It's funny how all these "Christians" always seem to have so little humility.
There won't be doctrine because insular communities don't exist. Without community, which has dissolved due to technology and population size/population flow that goes along with it, how exactly do you expect these belief systems you're presenting to develop? Much like how genetic flow in populations prevents genetic drift, memetic flow in populations prevents ideological drift.
You're mistaking correlation for causation. The fall of religion has been caused by the changing structure of society, not the other way around.
