Estás usando un navegador desactualizado. Es posible que no muestre este u otros sitios web correctamente. Deberías actualizar o usar un navegador alternativo.
Notice how the fag flag has six distinct colors while the actual rainbow (God's promise) has seven. Six being the number of incompletion and seven being the number of completion. Satan can only imitate the God-given beauty of a straight marriage and its purpose. The gays cannot reproduce without raping and molesting, therefore, Satan is a faggot and his theft of the rainbow pisses me off
Notice how the fag flag has six distinct colors while the actual rainbow (God's promise) has seven. Six being the number of incompletion and seven being the number of completion.
Indigo and violet are in ROYGBIV. They're the IV at the end, which is why I'm thrown for a loop and anticipating something that folds the red and violet into each other, or it's turquoise which sometimes shows up in prism refractions between the green and blue.
(Easy cheat on indigo and violet, violet has a touch of red's warmth while indigo is the moody goth shadow of blue)
The original source for the child molester claim is from here https://archive.md/sX8zg If you google the stats, this source will be not shown, and they'll try muddle it by claiming it's majority "heterosexual" people, despite the men only molesting boys, they also group in bisexual men to muddle the statistics more, any man who molests a boy but says he's "straight" also get put into the heterosexual category.
Edit as you can even see with the ai overview going "nuh uh, men molesting boys has nothing to do with sexuality" Ver archivo adjunto 9126648
I got threadbanned once for arguing that men who rape boys are not straight. The amount of people even in right wing spaces who defend faggotry is insane. The idea that molestation is just about power and isn't sexual to the perpetrator is the weirdest cope I've seen.
I know I'm several days late on this, but it's Pride Fag Month and I just skimmed over a few pages of two retards arguing over if women like gay sex or not.
Admittedly these stats are bullshit. I don't think people understand how many 1000 partners is. Very few fags reach that number and reporting is unreliable. Literal hoes don't even reach 1000, and you start losing count after like a dozen anyway.
I got threadbanned once for arguing that men who rape boys are not straight. The amount of people even in right wing spaces who defend faggotry is insane. The idea that molestation is just about power and isn't sexual to the perpetrator is the weirdest cope I've seen.
I've seen the same shit it's fucking insane, it was one of those cringe/smug "oh you're worried about drag queens molesting kids which never happens chud, how about these men in dresses, referring to priests" I think it was in r/arethestraightsok and it was just a bunch of literal faggots doing the mental gymnastics of why a man who molests only boys is "straight" even though he will also have sex with adult men as well. I didn't even bother engaging, they're so far around the corner of delusions, they're willing to ignore literal definitions of words to suit their own faggot agenda.
It's just the case of, we know faggots molest boys and join the church, they know we know, but they'll pretend we don't know and so the cycle continues.
I just read the posts of people like this in a thick, "so bad it would make 1950s audiences uncomfortable" Chinese accent, because half of them are Chinese bots who are trying to foment hatred of America for glory of most benevolent CCCP.
"ah you see, round eye, ho' world raughing at you and orange man! yo' american nationarism very very dispreasing to decen' human beeeings, gwailo"
It's fun and it keeps you from accidentally empathizing with these accounts as if they were people.
Just found my reddit account banned from a subreddit for using https://redact.dev/ . What's funny is that I did that a few months ago and the ban was a couple days ago, so it's probably a butthurt janny trying and failing to find a reason to ban me for comments I've made. I also have my profile hidden to make it harder.
“Femcels” are kind of a misnomer—it usually just describes the kind of women who can’t get any man to commit to them, as opposed to the male incels who can’t get a woman to touch them at all. Their common thread is that both groups blame everyone but themselves and openly seethe about it instead of trying to fix the problem.
Rare is the woman who is repulsive enough to be a true permavirgin despite her best efforts to get laid. There will always be some kind of degenerate man willing to stick his dick anywhere if a woman’s willing to abandon her self-respect for it.
Notice how the fag flag has six distinct colors while the actual rainbow (God's promise) has seven. Six being the number of incompletion and seven being the number of completion. Satan can only imitate the God-given beauty of a straight marriage and its purpose. The gays cannot reproduce without raping and molesting, therefore, Satan is a faggot and his theft of the rainbow pisses me off
First one, obviously, how can 24% to 90% of lesbians can be abused by their partner, what kind of retarded statistic is this?
Gay men having 500-1000 lifetime partners is also retarded (seriously, how?), and comes from a 1978 survey from San Francisco Bay Area. The real number is around 10-15, according to the Google, higher than 6 for straight men but not something mind-blowing.
The pedoohile one is also isn't true, because they only use homosexual identification instead of homosexual+bisexual identification. Pedophiles make up such a small percentage of the population that even if homosexual+bisexual males are overrepresented, it doesn't mean much, since pedophilia itself is extremely rare.
Gay male couples are less likely to divorce compared to straight couple, who are in turn less likely to divorce compared to lesbian couples.
It’s because bisexual women were lumped into this statistic and it didn’t account for the gender of the abusive partner. It’s also not uncommon for lesbians to have been in relationships with men before realizing they aren’t genuinely attracted to them and/or a relationship won’t fix it. Apparently the survey just asked women who self-identify as being attracted to other women “has anyone ever abused you before?” and didn’t break down the data beyond that into anything useful.
I wouldn’t be too incredulous if it turned out lesbians committed more DV than straight women (it would be more logical, in a lesbian relationship there’s no huge physical power differential) but there’s just no way any group of actual female women are committing DV at astronomically higher rates than males across the board. It’s just biologically implausible.
Now if troon “lesbians” and testosterone poisoned pooners were surveyed, that might uncover some nightmarish statistics.
It seems like reddit has removed the left sidebar in favor of this horrid account creation banner and art, which was previously in the upper right hand corner.. It's not a major deal but it's annoying that they got rid of the "previously visited communities" section for logged out users. I hope I don't have to look at that hideous art every time I browse this website.
It seems like they are either going to make reddit atrocious looking and unusable for people who dont have a account or flat out stop people with no account from accessing reddit until they sign up. Almost every other website has done this, it was only a matter of time before reddit went down the same path.
The guy who made it Millennial Woes is a morbidly obese chain smoking homosexual redpill MRA YouTuber who lives in a trailer park and is in a poly relationship with three other obese gay rednecks.
Small perky naturals is one thing, but to extend that to "the smaller the better" is a bit suspect. Add the Reddit Factor and it can only mean one thing.
Yeah, I have seen it parroted that lesbians commit more domestic violence, but when you dig in, it's not women that are committing the violence on lesbians.
Honestly just use common sense, is it more likely for a woman or man to beat his partner? Same goes for stupid stats like "Half of gay men had 500 partners" or "99.8% of gay teenagers turn straight". The numbers make no sense.
I also would like to see if MTFs are more likely to commit certain male crimes compared to normal men. Is there any data on this?
But who would need to go to reddit now that they allow LLMs to scrape everything? I can just use Google and get the AI summary of whatever a faggot redditor said
