Opinion Red Flag: Why we should ban cars altogether

Link (Archive)

Red Flag: Why we should ban cars altogether​

Are you paying for a BMW? I didn’t think I was. I mean, I’ve never sat in such a gas guzzler. I don’t even know how to drive. But I am still paying for one — and if you live in Germany, you are too.

All of us are paying subsidies for cars. The Dienstwagenprivileg, tax rebates for company cars, costs the German state about €3 billion every year. Every time a rich asshole vrooms by in a two-ton limousine, chances are that you are footing part of the bill.

Greenpeace has calculated that Germany spends a total of €46 billion every year subsidising activities that ruin the climate.
But that’s not the only handout for automobiles. It’s costing more than €600 million to extend the A100 freeway a few kilometers into Treptow. The next segment of that Autobahn will likely cost more than €1 billion for a few more kilometers into Friedrichshain.

Greenpeace has calculated that, each year, the German state spends a total of €46 billionsubsidising activities that ruin the climate.

That brings us to the €9 Ticket. Like 30 million other people in Germany, I am loving it. It’s not just cheap — it’s a relief to jump on the S-Bahn and not have to worry about a ticket. But it’s going to run out in just one month, and politicians from across the spectrum are saying we simply can’t afford to continue it.

According to Greenpeace, it would cost just €4 billion to provide everyone with a “climate ticket” for just €365 per year, or €1 per day. So that could be financed entirely by stopping handouts for Audis, Mercedes, and BMW. But I won’t hold my breath.

In this country, poor people have to subsidise transport for rich people. But rich people cannot possibly be asked to help pay for transport for everyone. Taxes pay for BMWs but not for busses. If you were a Captain Planet supervillain trying to destroy the earth for fun, you would have trouble coming up with a more destructive policy than the German governments.

Cars are a ridiculously inefficient way of moving people through the city — 2,000 kilograms of machine for a single person.
Cars are killing all of us. According the historian Klaus Gietinger, 3,700 die in traffic accidents every single day: “Imagine if every day 2.5 Titanics would sink, 7 packed jumbo jets would crash, or 37 times the worst train accident in German history would happen.” Gietinger calculates that cars have killed 70 million people since they were invented. It’s like they’re at war against people. In early June, five people were killed in a train crash in Bavaria. That topped the national news for three days. But cars kill twice as many people in Germany every day — when is the last time you saw that on the Tagesschau?

People say that Berlin is too loud and dirty. But what, exactly, is causing that? Cars ruin urban life. Imagine how luxuriously wide Berlin’s streets used to be before both sides were packed with giant metal boxes — boxes that stand unused for 23.5 hours per day.

The policy of car supremacy dates back to a time when only aristocrats with chauffeurs could afford any kind of motor vehicle. Of course they got the right of way. Yet as André Gorz wrote back in 1973: “the car, like a villa by the sea, is only desirable and useful insofar as the masses don’t have one.” Cars were nonetheless offered to the masses. They are a ridiculously inefficient way of moving people through the city — 2,000 kilograms of machine for a single person — but they have still taken over most of the urban landscape.

Cars don’t just kill us with accidents. Fine particle pollution leads to all kinds of illness. Carbon emissions are leading to rapid changes in climate. The German car lobby, also known as the Bundesregierung, promises us that all will be solved with E-Autos. But electric cars are a scam. They take up just as much room and are just as loud as gas guzzlers — the only “advantage” is that they shift some of the pollution to South America and Africa.

E-Autos won’t solve any problems — but they do promise to generate billions in profits.
E-Autos won’t solve any problems — but they do promise to generate billions in profits. Public transport, in contrast, is just too efficient to make much money.

On a square near my home in Neukölln, called the Bohemian Square, a single stretch of road (less than ten metres) was closed to traffic. Almost immediately, urban life blossomed there. Now from morning to night, children are drawing with chalk and young adults are playing ping pong. People are meeting their neighbours. This was impossible before, because the space was reserved for any driver who might want to barrel by. Take out the cars, and you have an actual city.

So let’s ban cars from Berlin. Actually, we don’t even need to ban them. It would be enough to stop subsidising for them. If drivers had to pay the actual costs of cars — for all the injuries, the pollution, the roads, the parking, etc. — not even the richest would be able to afford them. Let’s put all that money into subsidising bikes and giving everyone free — not €9, but free — public transport.
 
Ever see the interior of a Borg cube ship in Star Trek?

I think that may be how wokeists really want all to be.

I always viewed the Borg as being an allegory for collectivism and totalitarianism in general. The romulans may have been the in-story USSR, but the Borg were collectivist ideology itself.
 
I always viewed the Borg as being an allegory for collectivism and totalitarianism in general.
Wokeists are very collectivist. If a SJW posts anything "problematic", they can be "cancelled" by the other SJWs on "social media". Also seems they all "virtue signal" with the latest Current Thing of Current Year. Maybe this car ban thing is a new Current Thing?
 
Última edición:
Fuck off. Private planes wouldn't cost any more than cars today, if they hadn't been regulated to death.
Fuck off. The rich kids’ toys go before mine do.

I’ll believe they’re serious about climate when I hear about George Soros flying 1st class on Shitball Airways and waiting in line to take a leak in the lavatory.

Because we know they aren’t serious. Convincing the plebs to give up what they have is necessary to achieve the techno-neofeudalism that puts their kind on top and in control, forever.
 
Fuck off. The rich kids’ toys go before mine do.

I’ll believe they’re serious about climate when I hear about George Soros flying 1st class on Shitball Airways.

Because they aren’t. Sacrifices are for the plebs.
What Imma saying, is that the lefties would be screeching about private planes rather than cars in 2022, hadn't it been for the demented, overblown aviation safety requirements. Which made the damn things unaffordable for anyone but the rich kids. I will not argue this point further here.
 
1980s modern life:
1960s-father-and-mother-with-son-and-daughter-in-white-four-news-photo-1618514613.jpg

2020s modern life:
p1647313739_373type_jpeg_size_620_150_end.jpg_b.jpg


"TAKE ZES SHUTTLE, GOY!"
 
Clearly that article was paid and funded by big horse and big wagon mustering it’s last cash reserves weaponized against the results of Mr.Ford revolutionizing the means of private travel by mentally priming people to willfully go into areas highly concentrated with niggers and gypsies.

The walkable city meme is that, a meme. Most cities are are already walkable y’all just fat fucks and don’t want to walk the 1-3 mile journey to the damn strip mall to get food and walk back you all want all your personal desires to literally be a stones toss away. If you want to live like gross ass Indians or communists so be it, expect to choke on on industrial fumes since all types of work will also be that close. What is described most of the time as a “walkable city” is a small-medium sized town or those truck stop village things littered all across the interstate where the grocery store/gas station/hotel/restaurant thing is the sole source of the area’s economy. The description that brings in public transportation is always those hyper condensed 3rd world/communist hellholes.

You will live in the Kowloon walled city und you will be happy, you have everything you need, a personal sleeping cage overhanging out over some ladies sleeping cube….

37B10DF3-73C8-44A0-9D4E-8FEB9CBC9248.jpeg
 
Última edición:
They all want to live like Belle from Beauty and the Beast. The baker, butcher, and bookstore all walking distance away. Problem is, is in order to get that in real life, it would mean moving to some small village away from the cities, and interacting with more rural folk. That is unacceptable, so the only option in their eyes is to make it nearly impossible for cars to drive through cities. If they actually put two and two together though, they’d realize that it is actually impossible because you need semis to carry things like food, medicine, and retail merchandise. Otherwise, cities don’t function as cities.
 
Última edición:
When I had a commute that had me driving up and down my hive's main street where the buses were densest there would always be a traffic backup because 1. the buses didn't have dedicated pull-offs to keep traffic flowing around their giant roadblock asses and 2. Bus drivers are trained and have to give mandatory aid, so junkies will congregate at stops during daytime hours because when they inevitably O.D. they know a narcan shot is only a few minutes away.

Imagine being a bughive commuter. Busses here actually go to a decent number of places, only have to ride for an hour. Only have to walk 20 mins. to get to bus stop. Only have to walk 10 mins to get to work. Only bus that will get him to work on time gives him a whole 5 minutes extra in case he needs that extra double soy double corn syrup latte to make it through the day's crushing rat race. He's even rode enough that the guy who lives on the bus who had the words "baby eater" tattooed on his forehead has stopped staring at him. Can't be late today because big meeting. 3 consecutive stops have a guy O.D.ing, 3 hours late to work.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo