Culture Reconsidering the Jewish Pharisees

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
L | A
By Cathy Lynn Grossman
85700-1.jpg

New Testament scholars Joseph Sievers and Amy-Jill Levine share a goal: dissect and demolish 2,000 years of Christians’ disparaging portrayals of the Pharisees, the Jewish rabbis of Jesus’s time. They are the coeditors of The Pharisees (Eerdmans, Dec.), a compendium of essays drawn from a May 2019 international conference at the Gregorian University in Rome, “Jesus and the Pharisees: An Interdisciplinary Reappraisal,” that brought together dozens of Christian and Jewish scholars who examined the origins and impact of slandering Jews from Jesus’ time to today.

Sievers, a Catholic priest and professor emeritus of Jewish history and literature of the Hellenistic period at the Pontifical Biblical Institute in Rome, led the conference. For the book, he teamed up with Levine, an emerita professor from Vanderbilt University, who joined Hartford Seminary in August as a professor of New Testament and Jewish studies.

The Pharisees tracks hateful portrayals of Jews “not only in scholarly works but also in the arts, including Passion plays and cinema, as well as in textbooks and in preaching,” Sievers says. “Old and new prejudices and stereotyping, which are rampant today, are based often on ignorance or sometimes on false certainties. The Pharisees have been and are victims of both. A reconsideration has to be done by Jews, Christians, and other scholars together.”

Levine, who is Jewish, encountered anti-Semitic tropes even as a child, growing up in a Portuguese Roman Catholic neighborhood in North Dartmouth, Mass. She recalls “friends with crucifixes on the walls and rosary beads in their hands,” one of whom said, “You killed our Lord.” She adds, “I started asking questions then, and I’m continuing to do so 60 years later.”

Levine says that for Jews, the Pharisees are “our spiritual ancestors, those who preserved the interpretations of Israel’s scriptures and adapted them for the people apart from the Jerusalem Temple. Many Christians, following certain Gospel passages, regard the Pharisees and, by extension the Jewish tradition, as lifeless, legalistic, and so toxic. After two millennia of misunderstanding and in consequence, bigotry, it’s time for a more historical, less negatively stereotypical understanding both of the Pharisees and of Jesus’ interactions with them.”

In their own chapters in the book, the coeditors each give very specific suggestions for change in teaching, preaching, and cultural presentations of the Pharisees. Sievers writes that people need to recognize “how elusive it is to know your own self, much less the historical Pharisees.”

Levine writes, “If priests, pastors, and religious educators would stop bearing false witness against Pharisees, if people in general will stop using ‘Pharisee’ as a synonym for ‘hypocrite,’ and if Jews and Christians had better knowledge of both our common roots and our distinct branches, we’d be closer to the love of neighbor and love of stranger that Leviticus and Jesus command.”

Andrew Knapp, Eerdmans’s senior acquisitions editor, says, “Ignorance and prejudice fueled anti-Semitism throughout history.” The Pharisees, which also includes an address to the 2019 conference by Pope Francis, demonstrates the “essential role of interfaith collaboration in the study of history, theology, and the practice of religion,” Knapp adds.
 
Sievers was ordained in his fifties in 2000 after 30 odd years of a career in Jewish studies. By contrast he's been a member of the Focolare since 1965, which if you don't know, is a fucked up weirdo ecumenically inclined community that have their own towns and shit. Like a fucked up LDS or Scientology worming it's way around inside the Catholic church, mainly in Italy but there's a couple hundred thou members around the odd.

All that should tell you what kind of faggot he is. No idea who the kike is though
 
Levine, who is Jewish,
This is the most redundant statement ever written.

The whole historical Jesus thing is remarkably simple.

>kid called Jesus is born in Jewish Galilee circa 4AD
>becomes a carpenter
>gets mad that the jewish temple priests are insufficiently jewish according to jewish teachings
>claims to be the messiah and King of the jews
>temple jews mad
>romans pissed off
>gets crucified by the Romans for sedition
 
Última edición:
Levine writes, “If priests, pastors, and religious educators would stop bearing false witness against Pharisees, if people in general will stop using ‘Pharisee’ as a synonym for ‘hypocrite,’ and if Jews and Christians had better knowledge of both our common roots and our distinct branches, we’d be closer to the love of neighbor and love of stranger that Leviticus and Jesus command.”
He says while not making any effort to change his behavior.
 
Out of curiosity, what does "money changing" actually signify. I presume it's not "I only want to donate 1 shekel to the collection and I don't have less than a 10 shekel note". Because that by itself doesn't really sound like it deserves a whipping.
It became a Jewish place of business instead of worship, what else would that entail?
 
Out of curiosity, what does "money changing" actually signify. I presume it's not "I only want to donate 1 shekel to the collection and I don't have less than a 10 shekel note". Because that by itself doesn't really sound like it deserves a whipping.
The temple priests were selling required sacrificial animals for a profit, turning the temple, and worship itself, into a business.
 
The temple priests were selling required sacrificial animals for a profit, turning the temple, and worship itself, into a business.
Also, you could only buy the sacrificial animals with shekels, not denari, so you had to change your money at a mark up, to buy your dove or whatever
 
It's good that these disgusting jews are acknowledging that modern jews are, of course, the same pharisees that Jesus railed against.
Out of curiosity, what does "money changing" actually signify. I presume it's not "I only want to donate 1 shekel to the collection and I don't have less than a 10 shekel note". Because that by itself doesn't really sound like it deserves a whipping.
Have you ever tried to exchange one sort of currency for another at a currency exchange place at an airport, and been 'frustrated' at their refusing to take perfectly good, non fake currency that you wanted to get rid of, while giving you 'new' currency of the sort you actually wanted that was far more damaged/questionable looking than the stuff they were referring to take? While charging a fee/dishonest conversion rate that could have them taking upwards of 10% of your money?

Imagine that, but only jews are allowed to be employed in currency exchange. Horrifying
 
"Actually money changing in the temple was good, dipshits"
To be fair, as far as I know of the various Jewish sects operating in Palestine 2,000 years ago, the Pharisees were one of the groups least connected to the Temple in Jerusalem. That's the main reason modern rabbinical Judaism owes vastly more to Pharisaical Judaism than any other form of Temple Judaism. The Pharisees (and the Christians, if you want to still count them by that point) were the only significant Jewish groups capable of functioning semi-coherently post destruction of the Second Temple by the Romans.

Out of curiosity, what does "money changing" actually signify. I presume it's not "I only want to donate 1 shekel to the collection and I don't have less than a 10 shekel note". Because that by itself doesn't really sound like it deserves a whipping.
It had been determined by the Temple leadership that profane money (meaning Roman and Greek money) could not be used to buy anything for the Temple nor could it be donated to the Temple directly. If you owned the proper farm animals for sacrifice yourself you were still good, but if not you would have to exchange your money for clean Temple money to purchase the proper animals. The exchange rate was done in such a way as to be extremely favorable to the Temple and the merchants they contracted to sell sacrificial animals in the Temple courtyard.
 
Out of curiosity, what does "money changing" actually signify. I presume it's not "I only want to donate 1 shekel to the collection and I don't have less than a 10 shekel note". Because that by itself doesn't really sound like it deserves a whipping.
Besides the responses above, jews were also the first to systematically shave coin edges then melt the shavings back together to literally generate new money from thin air. I know this seems less egregious today with stock splits and whatnot, but defacing currency to jew more of it into existence is the reason coins have such exacting specifications to size/weight/details now.
 
Animal sacrifices? Who the fuck were they worshipping? Khorne?

We're talking Mediterranean and Near Eastern religions 2000 years ago. Animal sacrifice was common, accepted and required. I don't know much about Jewish Temple customs, but I presume they weren't that different from their Semitic neighbors. Human sacrifice was also a thing (even if rare) famously the Romans did it twice (to the horror of their own historians), burying alive two Gauls and two Greeks as a plea to the Gods to save them from Hannibal.

About the book, it's an extremely interesting subject. Traditional and biblical representation of the situation in Hellenistic/Roman Judaea have colored for centuries the historical narrative, and research focused on what the fuck the guys where in their own time and not literary images should be welcomed.

The Romans shouldn'tve stopped.

They killed everyone they could, destroyed the city, expelled the Jews, forbid them to re-enter, changed the province name and dispersed the population. Bar for sustained and focused genocide, not exactly standard Roman behavior, they pretty much went as hard as they could.
 
Pharisees were barely Jewish. They got into power in the Maccabean period when the whole order of power got twisted up to appease the growing power of Rome in Jerusalem's fight against Antioch and Egypt.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo