and I must scream
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 17 de Ene, 2021
I didn't say they are the only ones that use this framework. I say they are using it to the extreme and use fearmongering and catastrophizing and other means, that makes these people think that right now in real time, they are going through a genocide or on the verge on it. When you are in this mindset you bet you get rather obsessive about that part of identity that you are (in the his case, in your mind only) persecuted for.So is modern feminism, so is modern antiracism.
Everything you see in the modern agenda has been indoctrinated by communists since the start of the cold war (or even earlier).
But there is another thing that makes this unique imo, and it's the fact that they had not been trans and then suddenly they are. This is different than, for example, being a black person because you have being a black person all your life and you has been getting this idea that you are oppressed gradually throughout life (if that's true or not is a different question). These trans identified people, they were not persecuted and now suddenly when they "discover" they are trans, they are persecuted. I was originally replying to this question:
So I was trying to explain what I think are the reasons for this drastic change in the behaviour of these people. They were not persecuted minority, and now this new identity makes them the most persecuted minority ever. So they are obsessive about this identity, they center it and they are very aggressive about it.Back here again, but I have an actual question. What is it about trooning out that rewires someone's ENTIRE PERSONALITY to be more obnoxious and aggressive? And I mean like before they would've never mentioned their identity in conversation but after they have to CONSTANTLY make it apparent that they're trans?
I understand that the "it's not inborn" comment is what set you off. Let me clarify: I am not talking about this at all. I am not talking about the question of is this a legitimate condition (psychological or physical) or not. I am talking about the current trans movement, which speaks of something called "gender identity", which is basically an individual's internal sense of being male, female, both, neither, or somewhere along the gender spectrum that everyone has, and this internal sense is the only thing that counts in the question of whether you are actually a man, women, neither, both or "somewhere on the spectrum" (so there is a spectrum now). It's not a condition, it's not an illness, everyone has it, it's just that some people happened to be born with a gender identity that doesn't match their sex (which they call "sex assigned at birth"), and that's totally normal.There are hermaphrodites: people who have unusual genitalia or/and unusual brain/hormonal patterns. Having actual sexual dysphoria is that, minus the genitals and the chromosomes. I don't understand why people find that impossible.
What you are describing in the post is a phenomenon caused by the popularisation of said condition and the lack of proper medical control. Look at Eastern Europe or Balkans: it's not nearly as "noble" to be trans in these places, but trans people still do exist here. Except in these places it's a 1/1000000 thing, like it's supposed to be.
That they are riding on an already known condition and a very fringe and small minority that already existed for a while, that's another story and it's a big part of how they gained legitimacy and sympathy from such a big part of society in the first place; but this is still a different phenomenon, in my opinion.
They say you (everyone) are born with an internal sense of whether you are a man, woman or something else. The internal sense is what's inborn. An internal sense that isn't dependents on anything. It's not a condition that may be cured one day (how dare you say something like that!). It's not something in your brain. It's not about society sex rules. They voided it of any actual meaning, it's as vague as possible, but at the same time it's of the utmost importance that you figure it out.
They created a whole different monster. They invented all kind of terminology around this too. For example, "gender euphoria". What the hell is that? Who even talks like that? It's extremely weird. They have made it into a value in and of itself, something you should search and strive for. I've seen women who transitioned and they say they didn't transitioned because they hated their female body or hated being women, they just felt their "real self" fits more that of a man, or some other bullshit of this sort. I swear to god I do not make this up. I've seen this with my own eyes. "Gender affirming surgeries" is about "bodily autonomy" which is a human right so everyone should have access to it if they just want it, no psychological or medical evaluation is required. You are encouraged to go on "gender exploration" even if you don't have any particular reason to do so. Not to mention, every discomfort with your sexed body or what you you think is expected of you as a woman or a man is now "gender dysphoria" and a sign that you are trans.
So no, in this context I don't think being trans is "inborn". I don't know exactly what I think about "true gender dysphoria" and if transitioning is really a good treatment for it (by "good treatment" I mean "the positive overcome the negative", because physically it is just not healthy at all, period), I don't think the experts know themselves if I'm being honest. All I can say is that this "gender identity" as it is currently defined is not inborn. It is manufactured.
