💬 Off-Topic Random Trans Thoughts, Musings, and Questions - For all your armchair psych and general sperging

1768364701178.png
1768364749459.png
 
Blanchard is right in a sense that a lot of trans people are obsessed with proving to other people that they are also women like them. Which ironically backfires since their bodies are male which gives them more advantages and turns into how a lot of people who oppose them don't want them in women's sports. The more you nootice, the more you realize how it's very strange that trans women are addicted to the validation high from people saying that they are women in male-dominated circles such as speedrunning, game tourneys, programming, anything that most women particularly don't do. Like they want to prove women can also do it too but at the same time fail to do that.
 
I get what he’s saying in that if there was a ‘woman only’ circle in the middle of a distant forest with no one to observe it then trannies would not be driven to trek out there to stand in it. Without external observation, the dopamine don’t hit. Hence why their gross selfies have to be shared. Just being a facsimile of a woman in private is not enough.
 
Blanchard is right in a sense that a lot of trans people are obsessed with proving to other people that they are also women like them. Which ironically backfires since their bodies are male which gives them more advantages and turns into how a lot of people who oppose them don't want them in women's sports. The more you nootice, the more you realize how it's very strange that trans women are addicted to the validation high from people saying that they are women in male-dominated circles such as speedrunning, game tourneys, programming, anything that most women particularly don't do. Like they want to prove women can also do it too but at the same time fail to do that.
There's a food tuber that also runs a podcast, Adam Ragusea, that gave an argument that was at least internally consistent, if reprehensible: Women's sports are important, but they're just sports. Respecting trannies is MORE important and women need to bow to the heckin' valid queens. link
1768495689633.png
 
There's a food tuber that also runs a podcast, Adam Ragusea, that gave an argument that was at least internally consistent, if reprehensible: Women's sports are important, but they're just sports. Respecting trannies is MORE important and women need to bow to the heckin' valid queens. link
Ver archivo adjunto 8422745
Identity validation is better to care about then women getting hurt? These people are reprehensible.
 
Identity validation is better to care about then women getting hurt? These people are reprehensible.

Plus if it’s “just games,” tell the troons to get over it. He’s basically advocating that women give it up because it’s not important but that we need to understand that troons getting everything they want is.
 
"Gender affirmation" is just a socially-accepted form of requesting narcissistic supply. They barge into any and every space, then bother you with their transness. It's "vulnerable narcissist" shit.

>goes to spaces for women repeatedly
>makes the same "uwu r transgirls allowed here? 🥺👉👈" post in each one, fishing for attention and ego boosts


This is especially apparent on Reddit where posts asking for gender affirmation are extremely common. Unlike a normal person, the narcissistic Reddit troon NEEDS a constant supply of "stunning and brave" compliments to boost his ego, because without them, he will have to face the reality that he's a castrated balding fat man.

Another way you can tell they're narcissists is by how they describe their relationships. Their ex-spouses are "evil". Their family is "abusive". They like polyamory because they have a partner for x, a partner for y, and a partner for z. They only think of themselves.
 
I hate the fucking voice troons do. It feels like they are legitimately mocking women with this shit. I'd honestly prefer they all did a Monty Python falsetto compared to the creaky squeaky nasal monotone they try to pass off as "feminine". Every time I hear one of these freaks squeal their way through a conversation sounding like Shmorky it legitimately feels like a hate crime against true and honest women.
 

Does anyone have a counterargument to something like this? My first thought it because "Well because most men will most likely change their mind and regret it more had they taken it rather than not taking it." I know ftms get more changes than mtfs, but I'm pretty sure most men still don't want to end up with extra breast tissue...? Or maybe the argument that 90% of men aren't going to pass anyway, even if they transition young. Plus the majority of people transitioning also aren't dealing with a life threatening issue (at least pre-transition.)

(Maybe this is too dumb to argue with, or too lost because the argument already seems pseudo-suicidal.)
 
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ajQA4NTwvz0
Does anyone have a counterargument to something like this? My first thought it because "Well because most men will most likely change their mind and regret it more had they taken it rather than not taking it." I know ftms get more changes than mtfs, but I'm pretty sure most men still don't want to end up with extra breast tissue...? Or maybe the argument that 90% of men aren't going to pass anyway, even if they transition young. Plus the majority of people transitioning also aren't dealing with a life threatening issue (at least pre-transition.)

(Maybe this is too dumb to argue with, or too lost because the argument already seems pseudo-suicidal.)
I noped the fuck out after listening to that faggy lisp. But looking at the first minute of the transcript... He's a twink that wants to dodge twink death. He knows if he masculinizes he'll no longer have a prime bussy. He's chasing a degenerate fetish and doing it to please others.
 
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ajQA4NTwvz0
Does anyone have a counterargument to something like this? My first thought it because "Well because most men will most likely change their mind and regret it more had they taken it rather than not taking it." I know ftms get more changes than mtfs, but I'm pretty sure most men still don't want to end up with extra breast tissue...? Or maybe the argument that 90% of men aren't going to pass anyway, even if they transition young. Plus the majority of people transitioning also aren't dealing with a life threatening issue (at least pre-transition.)

(Maybe this is too dumb to argue with, or too lost because the argument already seems pseudo-suicidal.)

Fuck it. I'll give it a shot.

The reasoning is simple: they want to stand out. Let's be honest, a lot of this shit is just body modding to the extreme. It's right next to nullifications and all that horrific shit. Look at the pooners pierced to the point of hell and back. How are they going to really stand out? They don't get piercings and tattoos because they see themselves as a positive canvas. They're pretty much trying to reinvent themselves in a way that a pixie cut or mullet could never. So, of course, they're going to get all this elaborate surgery and HRT treatment to achieve that ultimate look. Shocker, look how quickly they crumble when their hairline starts to recede. They have this delusional idea of what they want to be because they're actually trying to achieve a look. Why do you think all these pooners are literally micro-dosing HRT suddenly? Well, most of them are fujoshis, but they also want to stay "pretty." They don't want to be some disfigured, balding born-again faggot for no reason. Being a man will also suddenly make life so much easier. They'll get all the hot gay men they want, and get to walk into rooms and be treated like one of the boys. With all of the beautiful fixings of not getting the "wrong" attention in their minds. They want all the free asspats trannies and handmaidens pass around like its halloween year around.

With troons, they're just porn sick and want to live the easy life as women. My god, they wear their gynecomastia like a badge of fucking honor. Like a pair of bigger moobs and the wardrobe of a blind teenager is the new them. I swear, a long time ago, the porn-sick transitioned because women had everything easier sexually. These women could get laid 24/7 and just had to have the best orgasms, according to their latest hentai obsession. A lot of them also think that women have it so fucking easy compared to them. We just seem to bat our eyelashes like a 1950s housewife and get that Corvette we always wanted. When in actuality, they just want people to stop telling them to get off their fat fucking ass and get a job. They want all their gross behavior and habits to be seen as cute and quirky. They're just QuErE, so it's fine.

Yet the result is always the same: they all fucking regret it in one way or another. They either don't achieve that desired look or attention they so desperately craved. Life isn't any easier than they were promised by "becoming" the opposite sex. They only attract the cluster B rejects or people who chase trannies for an easy lay or free housing (only if hobosexuals that plague normal women knew that all they had to do was call a chic he/they/it, and life is on permanent easy mode). Or shocker, that the sex reassignment surgery and revisions they went into debt for just left them cripple for life. They're back at their aging parents' house (if not already there), waiting for the pain to stop or for the early onset of dementia to take them far away from their own shit show.

The ultimate argument/speculation at this point really just devolves into a game of Clue. Who killed themselves, where, and why. Surprise, it was the same bridge, and they left the same gay manifesto listing their archnemesis as one of their thirteen reasons why.

Fuck, that was bleak, even for me. I feel like I just wrote the outline for someone's fucking suicide note.
 
The reasoning is simple: they want to stand out.
It's why straight women say they're bisexual. You don't need to prove shit, yet it implies you've experimented enough to have confirmed that you like pussy. Except it's a weird thing to accuse others of; lying about their sexuality. Same with being nonbinary or having different pronouns. Nothing to prove. Now imagine being a kissless virgin boy in your teens. You can just start lisping and calling people daddy on TF2 and suddenly you're the talk of the town. You can jerk off to hairy studly tigermen while spiraling deeper and deeper.

Then you meet 'Daddy' at a furry convention, get presented with a stiff hairy man's dick and you realize "oh wait this isn't gucci at all".
 
Can anyone familiar with zoomer queer slang tell me what aromantic really is? These fags are triggered when you call their relationship "platonic friends", as if a normal person will care about your niche labels. Wow you're so unique!!! 👏
Hell, what the fuck is a qprs? I feel like a fucking boomer when I read these autistic sexuality ™ categories when most of them read like "not interested in one night stands or shallow relationships", "I'm not a porn addict", "platonic soul mates" or something but in walls of text.
 
Can anyone familiar with zoomer queer slang tell me what aromantic really is?
So, to understand this, I need to provide some context. Retarded zoomers believe in something called the "Split Attraction Model", which means, they believe your "Romantic Orientation" (who you kiss/cuddle with/want to spend the rest of your life with) and "Sexual Orientation" (who you fuck) can be two different things. I don't personally believe in this, I think you're either gay, straight, bisexual, or some type of weird autist who genuinely can't have sex/date (but true asexuality is very rare imo).

So being a "Heteroromantic Asexual", according to said tards, means you want an opposite sex partner but you don't want to have sex with them. Being a "Heteroromantic Bisexual" means you're a bisexual slut who will sleep with anyone but you'll only have real committed relationships with the opposite sex. Being an "Aromantic Asexual" (commonly abbreviated as "Aroace") means you don't want to date or have sex with anyone.

Typically, if someone doesn't specify that they're also Asexual in addition to Aromantic, like they identify as "Aromantic Heterosexual", then this translates from Woke Hoespeak to English as: "I exclusively have casual sex and I do not want to ever be in a committed relationship". Woke way of being a whore/manwhore basically.

These fags are triggered when you call their relationship "platonic friends", as if a normal person will care about your niche labels
Hell, what the fuck is a qprs?
QPR stands for "Queer-Platonic Relationship". It's another made-up retard word and I've seen people use it to describe two different things. Usually, it either means "my best friend" but these people are autistic and want to be special about it. They, for some reason, think that you cannot have a best friend that you care about as much as your lover. OR it means "I want someone to cuck into a sexless marriage with me". Basically, they're upfront about wanting to do everything that a marriage entails, like living together, getting legally married, helping each other pay bills, etc., but they have no interest in ever doing anything romantic/sexual with you. So you're like a permanent roommate. Sometimes, they'll even date other people on the side, so that's why I say it's basically like being a cuck. Having "QPR"s is very common for anyone who identifies as "Asexual"/"Aromantic"/"Aroace" because they still want someone to be their safety net without any actual normal long-term relationship commitment. These people tend to be serial narcissists and trannies.

Sidenote: Another related phenomenon is the "Asexual Spectrum". These people have an extremely warped perception of normal sexuality due to porn and social media. So they think not wanting to fuck every person you meet means you are somewhere on the "Asexual Spectrum". They also don't really understand the fact male and female sexuality function in different ways, with most women having what is called "responsive desire". The "Asexual Spectrum" has even more hyper-specific redundant labels, which usually boil down to, "I enjoy sex but I'm not terminally 24/7 horny". Oh yeah, and a lot of these "asexuals" tend to just be closeted homosexuals who haven't realized their lack of attraction to the opposite sex was because they like the same sex.
 
Última edición:
Sidenote: Another related phenomenon is the "Asexual Spectrum". These people have an extremely warped perception of normal sexuality due to porn and social media. So they think not wanting to fuck every person you meet means you are somewhere on the "Asexual Spectrum". They also don't really understand the fact male and female sexuality function in different ways, with most women having what is called "responsive desire". The "Asexual Spectrum" has even more hyper-specific redundant labels, which usually boil down to, "I enjoy sex but I'm not terminally 24/7 horny".

Fuck, you just gave me war flash backs to watching some nb chic arguing asexuality. The shit they come up with is beyond fucking mind numbing. I’ve never seen a group of people so dependent on getting away from the “heterosexual binary,” they can’t even come up with shit that makes sense. And all they fucking did was just make a new system, but so convoluted that you literally need a class on this shit.

I’m not saying college shouldn’t be free, but the mess now known as the women’s study curriculum should be excluded. That shit used to actually be useful, but now it’s just flooded with this QuEeR crap. I literally took two courses on feminism, and trannies (troons and pooners) were shoehorned in every time. I signed up for this shit to actually study activism and history. I don’t need a repeat crash course on why men and women can play social/literal dress up. And they can’t even get that shit right.

The amount of one semester lesbians crowding the courses is asinine. Apparently it wasn’t punishing enough to have to deal with them as a lesbian in the 90s. Now these retards just pooned out, and have ramped up their bs. Now I have a literal frog voiced store brand wannabe manlet trying to tell me that they’re still a faggot. You’re an abomination against god is what you are. It’s like troons, legit lesbians won’t touch you with a a ten foot pole.

This people is what happens when you take away asylums. Were left with the autistics and cluster b retards running rampant and unchecked.


Now imagine being a kissless virgin boy in your teens. You can just start lisping and calling people daddy on TF2 and suddenly you're the talk of the town. You can jerk off to hairy studly tigermen while spiraling deeper and deeper.

Then you meet 'Daddy' at a furry convention, get presented with a stiff hairy man's dick and you realize "oh wait this isn't gucci at all".

…TF2 has been through enough…

I don’t know what’s worse, the fact this happens constantly. Or the fact that these kids will literally get groomed even by a ham fucking sandwich.
 
Última edición:
"Split Attraction Model"
Thank you for the excellent tutorial. Not unlike the "sex and gender are separate!" bullshit, they've managed to deconstruct human pair bonding, sex, and sexual attraction into all imaginable, self serving categories. Combinations that used to be taboo or pathetic are now status-y and desirable because being a standard human animal isn't anymore. It's too hard or too limiting. It's boring. Tech changes culture. Even our deepest evolutionary drives are not impervious to that and we've been playing stupid games with them. It's been 60 years since the Sexual Revolution started tinkering with what worked for thousands of years. Has all this new found sexual freedom been beneficial to our species? Or has our tech and politics just insulated us from the negative consequences enough to keep going? It really makes me wonder what it's going to be like for young people to meet and mate 50 years from now.
 
the "Split Attraction Model", which means, they believe your "Romantic Orientation" (who you kiss/cuddle with/want to spend the rest of your life with) and "Sexual Orientation" (who you fuck) can be two different things.
Am I misunderstanding or is this not a pretty typical component of hetero male sexuality?
 
Am I misunderstanding or is this not a pretty typical component of hetero male sexuality?
No, unfortunately, they’re just really fucked up in the head. When you call someone a dog and treat them like one, they all start acting like it. These men are incapable of any meaningful platonic or romantic emotional connection, so physical intimacy is where they get it from. They can do romantic things with a woman, but that doesn’t mean they’re actually together in their head. They’re just really sad, lonely creatures.

Edit: most of them are deprived of platonic physical intimacy like hugs and shit after they’re a kids. And told to not be so emotional over everything. So they get really screwy. It’s not that some of aren’t attracted to women in a normal way, they’re just taught to seek male validation. So being a whore gets you more affirmation than actually finding a chic you like and being with her
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo