- Registrado
- 12 de Feb, 2024
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
Is Blanchard incapable of seeing through the lies they tell? Blanchard, dear god/s, needs to be punched by all women everywhere.
Blanchard is right in a sense that a lot of trans people are obsessed with proving to other people that they are also women like them. Which ironically backfires since their bodies are male which gives them more advantages and turns into how a lot of people who oppose them don't want them in women's sports. The more you nootice, the more you realize how it's very strange that trans women are addicted to the validation high from people saying that they are women in male-dominated circles such as speedrunning, game tourneys, programming, anything that most women particularly don't do. Like they want to prove women can also do it too but at the same time fail to do that.
There's a food tuber that also runs a podcast, Adam Ragusea, that gave an argument that was at least internally consistent, if reprehensible: Women's sports are important, but they're just sports. Respecting trannies is MORE important and women need to bow to the heckin' valid queens. linkBlanchard is right in a sense that a lot of trans people are obsessed with proving to other people that they are also women like them. Which ironically backfires since their bodies are male which gives them more advantages and turns into how a lot of people who oppose them don't want them in women's sports. The more you nootice, the more you realize how it's very strange that trans women are addicted to the validation high from people saying that they are women in male-dominated circles such as speedrunning, game tourneys, programming, anything that most women particularly don't do. Like they want to prove women can also do it too but at the same time fail to do that.
Identity validation is better to care about then women getting hurt? These people are reprehensible.There's a food tuber that also runs a podcast, Adam Ragusea, that gave an argument that was at least internally consistent, if reprehensible: Women's sports are important, but they're just sports. Respecting trannies is MORE important and women need to bow to the heckin' valid queens. link
Ver archivo adjunto 8422745
Identity validation is better to care about then women getting hurt? These people are reprehensible.
I noped the fuck out after listening to that faggy lisp. But looking at the first minute of the transcript... He's a twink that wants to dodge twink death. He knows if he masculinizes he'll no longer have a prime bussy. He's chasing a degenerate fetish and doing it to please others.https://youtube.com/watch?v=ajQA4NTwvz0
Does anyone have a counterargument to something like this? My first thought it because "Well because most men will most likely change their mind and regret it more had they taken it rather than not taking it." I know ftms get more changes than mtfs, but I'm pretty sure most men still don't want to end up with extra breast tissue...? Or maybe the argument that 90% of men aren't going to pass anyway, even if they transition young. Plus the majority of people transitioning also aren't dealing with a life threatening issue (at least pre-transition.)
(Maybe this is too dumb to argue with, or too lost because the argument already seems pseudo-suicidal.)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ajQA4NTwvz0
Does anyone have a counterargument to something like this? My first thought it because "Well because most men will most likely change their mind and regret it more had they taken it rather than not taking it." I know ftms get more changes than mtfs, but I'm pretty sure most men still don't want to end up with extra breast tissue...? Or maybe the argument that 90% of men aren't going to pass anyway, even if they transition young. Plus the majority of people transitioning also aren't dealing with a life threatening issue (at least pre-transition.)
(Maybe this is too dumb to argue with, or too lost because the argument already seems pseudo-suicidal.)
It's why straight women say they're bisexual. You don't need to prove shit, yet it implies you've experimented enough to have confirmed that you like pussy. Except it's a weird thing to accuse others of; lying about their sexuality. Same with being nonbinary or having different pronouns. Nothing to prove. Now imagine being a kissless virgin boy in your teens. You can just start lisping and calling people daddy on TF2 and suddenly you're the talk of the town. You can jerk off to hairy studly tigermen while spiraling deeper and deeper.The reasoning is simple: they want to stand out.
So, to understand this, I need to provide some context. Retarded zoomers believe in something called the "Split Attraction Model", which means, they believe your "Romantic Orientation" (who you kiss/cuddle with/want to spend the rest of your life with) and "Sexual Orientation" (who you fuck) can be two different things. I don't personally believe in this, I think you're either gay, straight, bisexual, or some type of weird autist who genuinely can't have sex/date (but true asexuality is very rare imo).Can anyone familiar with zoomer queer slang tell me what aromantic really is?
These fags are triggered when you call their relationship "platonic friends", as if a normal person will care about your niche labels
QPR stands for "Queer-Platonic Relationship". It's another made-up retard word and I've seen people use it to describe two different things. Usually, it either means "my best friend" but these people are autistic and want to be special about it. They, for some reason, think that you cannot have a best friend that you care about as much as your lover. OR it means "I want someone to cuck into a sexless marriage with me". Basically, they're upfront about wanting to do everything that a marriage entails, like living together, getting legally married, helping each other pay bills, etc., but they have no interest in ever doing anything romantic/sexual with you. So you're like a permanent roommate. Sometimes, they'll even date other people on the side, so that's why I say it's basically like being a cuck. Having "QPR"s is very common for anyone who identifies as "Asexual"/"Aromantic"/"Aroace" because they still want someone to be their safety net without any actual normal long-term relationship commitment. These people tend to be serial narcissists and trannies.Hell, what the fuck is a qprs?
Sidenote: Another related phenomenon is the "Asexual Spectrum". These people have an extremely warped perception of normal sexuality due to porn and social media. So they think not wanting to fuck every person you meet means you are somewhere on the "Asexual Spectrum". They also don't really understand the fact male and female sexuality function in different ways, with most women having what is called "responsive desire". The "Asexual Spectrum" has even more hyper-specific redundant labels, which usually boil down to, "I enjoy sex but I'm not terminally 24/7 horny".
Now imagine being a kissless virgin boy in your teens. You can just start lisping and calling people daddy on TF2 and suddenly you're the talk of the town. You can jerk off to hairy studly tigermen while spiraling deeper and deeper.
Then you meet 'Daddy' at a furry convention, get presented with a stiff hairy man's dick and you realize "oh wait this isn't gucci at all".
Thank you for the excellent tutorial. Not unlike the "sex and gender are separate!" bullshit, they've managed to deconstruct human pair bonding, sex, and sexual attraction into all imaginable, self serving categories. Combinations that used to be taboo or pathetic are now status-y and desirable because being a standard human animal isn't anymore. It's too hard or too limiting. It's boring. Tech changes culture. Even our deepest evolutionary drives are not impervious to that and we've been playing stupid games with them. It's been 60 years since the Sexual Revolution started tinkering with what worked for thousands of years. Has all this new found sexual freedom been beneficial to our species? Or has our tech and politics just insulated us from the negative consequences enough to keep going? It really makes me wonder what it's going to be like for young people to meet and mate 50 years from now."Split Attraction Model"
Am I misunderstanding or is this not a pretty typical component of hetero male sexuality?the "Split Attraction Model", which means, they believe your "Romantic Orientation" (who you kiss/cuddle with/want to spend the rest of your life with) and "Sexual Orientation" (who you fuck) can be two different things.
No, unfortunately, they’re just really fucked up in the head. When you call someone a dog and treat them like one, they all start acting like it. These men are incapable of any meaningful platonic or romantic emotional connection, so physical intimacy is where they get it from. They can do romantic things with a woman, but that doesn’t mean they’re actually together in their head. They’re just really sad, lonely creatures.Am I misunderstanding or is this not a pretty typical component of hetero male sexuality?