I really don’t know why they bother, it‘s like an anti-encyclopaedia where instead of informative knowledge they tell you misleading facts and partial information.
If all I knew about Chris was from that article I might presume Sonichu was a popular mid 2000’s webcomic and that plus now being a gaming YouTuber is how Chris makes his living.
Also trolls and hackers decided to harass and document Chris for seemingly no reason and did it so extensively he’s now one of the most documented people on the internet.
that's wikipedia for you, you don't realize how much lies and bullshit is on there until you read an article about something you happen to know a lot about
now imagine the same amount of bullshit is in nearly every article, oftentimes for agenda reasons because their biggest donators are billionaires and celebrities who want their own idea of what the world is like to be believed, and less commonly just out of stupidity and in tune with dumb common misconceptions
the worst thing about wikipedia isn't that it's full of shit, every source of info gets something wrong, albeit some more often, or more maliciously, than others
the worst part is that it's so commonly believed to be some kinda universal pool of truth and wisdom by nearly every living modern generation and pushed as a charming, selfless website dedicated to nothing but honesty and educating the masses
all that aside...
this article is a mess on so many fronts
nevermind the incomplete information, some of this info is downright contradictory, and even the syntax is a mess
they can't decide if they wanna use 'he' or 'she', pick one or the other but at least stick to it
the article combines seemingly random occurrences across the entirety of chris' life as if they are directly correlated and skips the actual connective events inbetween
it's like several people were fighting over editing this article, which, is actually kinda rare to see on wikipedia nowadays
the "encyclopedia anyone can edit" era of wiki is dead, nowadays you don't see these battles over the keyboard between two random whos on an article, the whole website is curated by a small team of editors and nearly every outside edit is scrutinized and likely reeled back if it doesn't fit the narrative no matter how accurate or even possible to prove it may have been