Opinion Putin’s long rule has ruined Russia

Link (Archive)
Putin’s long rule has ruined Russia

Vladimir Putin’s announcement that he’s running again for president of Russia has put me in a deep funk. Will this guy never retire? Will one never be able to see Russia as just Russia, and not as Putin Russia? Will he really stick around for another two terms, until 2036 — even beating Joseph Stalin’s record of 25 years in power by more than a decade?

Putin became Russia’s leader in 1999, when he was appointed prime minister. Who could have imagined then that the scrappy little KGB agent with the weak chin and ski lift nose would grace the halls of the Kremlin for another three and a half decades?

He came on like gangbusters, declaring that he’d manage democracy and make Russia great again, while establishing the image of a hypermasculine macho who rode horses bare-chested, wielded phallically obvious rifles and knives, practiced judo, drove leggy Russian ladies crazy, and, of course, outwitted the West, ruthlessly pursued Russian interests, and claimed to want to restructure the world.

Very little of that public persona is evident today. His tough-guy face is bloated. His former swagger has been replaced with a lumbering gait. He speaks uncertainly. Putin has gotten old and he looks it. He’s changed, for the worse, but his hold on Russia’s throne remains unshaken — even if only more or less.

I wouldn’t be kvetching about this particular dictator’s staying power were it not for three things.

First, he’s dominated Russian politics for almost as long as I’ve studied the place. Frankly, it’s getting boring to wake up to the same inscrutable face and the same kleptocratic tyrant who’s utterly predictable in his quest for ill-gotten lucre and bloody power. Is there really no one in Russia capable of replacing this guy and making Russian studies more interesting for the likes of me?

Second, the man has been a disaster — for Russia, for Ukraine, for the world. He transformed Russia from a respected country that was becoming more or less “normal,” to use a word Russians like, into a brutal and bloodthirsty rogue state feared by everyone and respected only by the North Koreans. In so doing he’s committing genocide and waging war against a country that dared to think of itself as a European democracy — Ukraine. The longer he stays, the worse things will get for everyone.

Third, he’s jaundiced the way I view Russia. I used to think of the country as one part mysterious, one part fascinating, and one part dangerous. No more. Now, when I view Russia and Russians, I don’t think of Pushkin or Tchaikovsky or Tolstoy. I think only of the Gulag, Ivan the Terrible, and Vladimir the just as Terrible. I don’t hear the music, I don’t see the paintings, I don’t see the novels. Instead, I hear the groans of countless victims of the Russian and Soviet secret police. I see barbed wire and concentration camps and starving peasants and mutilated bodies.

Frankly, when I think of Putin, Adolf Hitler comes to mind, and when I think of Russia, it’s Nazi Germany that comes to mind. And I suspect I feel about Putin Russia the same way many Germans and Jews felt about Germany in the 1930s. Surely the land of “poets and thinkers” couldn’t descend into the savagery Hitler represented. Surely the nation that produced Immanuel Kant and Johann Wolfgang von Goethecouldn’t unleash war and commit genocide. And yet it did.

None of this absolves Russians of the responsibility they bear for making Putin possible and for tolerating his crimes. Instead, hundreds of thousands have lost their lives fighting a stupid, criminal war in Ukraine. During World War I, Russians deserted from the front en masse. Others risked their lives for various revolutionary causes. Today’s Russians, alas, prefer to pretend there is no war, even as their fathers, brothers, and sons return en masse in body bags.

It’s all, or almost all, Putin’s fault. For more than two decades he’s beaten into Russians that he’s the godlike patriarch, a macho Messiah, and that they are his sheep. Life is easier when you can, as Erich Fromm put it years ago, “escape from freedom.” Criminality becomes normality, evil becomes good, good becomes evil — all sense of right and wrong is dulled, and one expects the Great Leader to resolve all one’s moral issues. And he does — by killing while pretending he’s not killing.

I confess that I’ve disliked Putin since day one: there’s something about the KGB and SS that rubs me the wrong way, I guess. Now, I just pray that, sooner rather than later, his puffy visage will disappear forever.
 
The worrying thing is what happens once Putin retires/being retired, he was good enough of a leader to manages to make Russia great again (at least until the last few years) and I doubt he has any person in the cabinet that can be relatively incorrupt enough to not ruin Russia once he is in charge (assuming there won't be a succession war).
 
Vladimir Putin’s announcement that he’s running again for president of Russia has put me in a deep funk. Will this guy never retire? Will one never be able to see Russia as just Russia, and not as Putin Russia? Will he really stick around for another two terms, until 2036 — even beating Joseph Stalin’s record of 25 years in power by more than a decade?
Wanna go back to Boris Yeltsin?, with hunger strikes for all?. Putin has been the best thing for Russia since a loooong time. And you think that his successor wont be a KGB asset, or do you expect "true democratic" elections like in the USA?(/sneed). Nah Russia needs a strong leader with dictatorial traits or it will collapse into a mudhut again.

Edit:sarcasm where needed.
 
Última edición:
The worrying thing is what happens once Putin retires/being retired, he was good enough of a leader to manages to make Russia great again (at least until the last few years) and I doubt he has any person in the cabinet that can be relatively incorrupt enough to not ruin Russia once he is in charge (assuming there won't be a succession war).
Putin isn't special. He doesn't have the energy of Peter the Great (or Ivan the Terrible) to truly remake Russia in any meaningful way. The defining characteristic of Putin's Russia until very recently was apathy. The reason Putin stays in charge is that he was placed in charge and any attempt to replace him would do more harm than good for those around him. There were a dozen other grey figures in Russian politics who could have achieved the same.

Wanna go back to Boris Yeltsin?, with hunger strikes for all?. Putin has been the best thing for Russia since a loooong time. And you think that his successor wont be a KGB asset, or do you expect true democratic elections like in the USA?. Nah Russia needs a strong leader with dictatorial traits or it will collapse into a mudhut again.
The guy who wrote the article is Alexander Motyl, a Ukrainian. Of course he would prefer a weak and self-hating Russia. He's been schizoposting about Russia being a glorified Finno-Uralic horde for at least the past decade.
 
Putin isn't special. He doesn't have the energy of Peter the Great (or Ivan the Terrible) to truly remake Russia in any meaningful way. The defining characteristic of Putin's Russia until very recently was apathy. The reason Putin stays in charge is that he was placed in charge and any attempt to replace him would do more harm than good for those around him. There were a dozen other grey figures in Russian politics who could have achieved the same.
this is a really important point that a lot of western democracy enjoyers can't wrap their head around. I've spent some time lurking in russian channels the prevailing idea I get from a lot of them is that a lot of people remember much worse times under yeltsin and simply not having funko pops and porn will be good enough to get the general population to rise up. No one really associates western style liberal democracy with anything good outside of areas with concentrations of liberals like Moscow and Putin's regime keeps them clamped down iirc. As long as the bar is "doing better than under yeltsin" the Nuland types have their work cut out for them if they want a Fehlinger style division of Russia.
 
FqtAheaacAAqy18.jpg
I don't GAF about Russia, but Put def. hasn't ruined the country.
 
It never ceases to amaze me when Americans and some western europeans act this naive.

Russia under the USSR was a shithole, and Yeltsin was a legalized Mafia state where the only people who liked that drunk retard were either the ones profiting from his complete sellout of a rule or westerners who never once looked into what Russia was going through and instead just saw the funny drunk russian dance on TV an thought it was cool.

The biggest reason Putin is such a cunt is because Yeltsin's rule showed Russia that you cannot trust the west to help them. Is it any wonder they are sticking with Putin despite his issues when the now have actual money to spend, warm beds to sleep in and real prospects that their kids will have a better life?
 
The biggest reason Putin is such a cunt is because Yeltsin's rule showed Russia that you cannot trust the west to help them. Is it any wonder they are sticking with Putin despite his issues when the now have actual money to spend, warm beds to sleep in and real prospects that their kids will have a better life?
The West didn't exactly did much to help any of the other eastern European nations after the Berlin Wall fell or the breakup of the USSR.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo