Law Proposed Vermont bill would ban cellphone use for anyone under 21 - legislative autism

Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.

----------

MONTPELIER — A bill has been introduced in the state Senate that would make it illegal for anyone under the age of 21 to use or possess a cellphone.
The bill, S.212, would make such possession or use a misdemeanor punishable by a maximum of a year behind bars and a $1,000 fine.
It said cellphone use while driving is one of the leading killers of teenagers. It also said young people use cellphones frequently to bully and threaten each other, something that has been linked to suicides.


“The Internet and social media, accessed primarily through cell phones, are used to radicalize and recruit terrorists, fascists, and other extremists. Cell phones have often been used by mass shooters of younger ages for research on previous shootings,” the bill reads.
The bill said the Legislature has concluded those under 21 years old “aren’t mature enough” to possess guns, smoke cigarettes or drink alcohol and the same should apply to cellphone use. The state recently increased the smoking age to 21 and barred those under 21 from buying a gun unless they take a hunter safety course.
The bill was introduced by Sen. John Rodgers, D-Essex-Orleans. Rodgers said Wednesday he introduced the bill to make a point.
“I have no delusions that it’s going to pass. I wouldn’t probably vote for it myself,” he said.
He said he’s a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and the Legislature “seems bent on taking away our Second Amendment rights.”
He said, based on the information presented in the bill, a cellphone is much more dangerous than a gun.
The bill talks about suicide and suicide prevention was a major talking point when the Legislature passed a bill requiring a 24-hour waiting period to buy a handgun. Gov. Phil Scott vetoed the legislation and it’s not expected to be taken up again this session.
Michelle Fay is the executive director of Voices for Vermont’s Children, an organization based out of Montpelier that promotes public policy that enhances the lives of children and youth in the state.
Fay issued a statement saying, “There are so many critical issues impacting the lives of working families in Vermont today, from increasing minimum wage to implementing equitable family and medical leave insurance programs to establishing an office of child advocate. We urge the Legislature to focus on the important work at hand instead of getting tied up in hollow diversions.”


She said in an interview Wednesday there’s no question technology plays a role with children treating each other badly, but isolating cellphones doesn’t seem to make sense because they will still be able to use computers.
“It feels like a reach, for sure,” she said.
Fay said parents rely on cellphone access to be able to get in touch with their kids. She said most of the calls teen drivers receive come from their parents.
She said it’s already against the law to text and drive. Fay said there need to be more conversations about distracted driving.
“For teenagers, people in their car is a bigger distraction than cellphones,” she said.
She said giving children conflict resolution skills and helping them feel more accountability for each other will help avoid cyberbullying.

----------
1578626615137.png

thank you methhead todd howard
 
Última edición:
It’s a pro 2nd amendment protest by a democrat that points out how absurd bans are.
He’s actually the good guy here.
This is wild:
The bill was introduced by Sen. John Rodgers, D-Essex-Orleans. Rodgers said Wednesday he introduced the bill to make a point.
“I have no delusions that it’s going to pass. I wouldn’t probably vote for it myself,” he said.
He said he’s a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and the Legislature “seems bent on taking away our Second Amendment rights.”
He said, based on the information presented in the bill, a cellphone is much more dangerous than a gun.
The bill talks about suicide and suicide prevention was a major talking point when the Legislature passed a bill requiring a 24-hour waiting period to buy a handgun. Gov. Phil Scott vetoed the legislation and it’s not expected to be taken up again this session.
 
Última edición:
Now he won't have to worry about those pesky victims trying to call for help!
 
That's a photo of John McAfee trying to look like a serious person.

And failing.
 
He's got a point about suicides and cellphones. revenge porn and bullying would drop if kids didn't have a phone. i'm not dumb enough to ignore the utility of kids having phones, but his point isn't wrong.
 
Two teens get into a car accident on a rural road. One is injured, but didn't sustain a major head injury. The other one flew through the wind shield and is unconscious on the ground and gushing blood from their head. So in this hypothetical situation, a teenager would be facing jail time because they did the right thing and called for an ambulance on an illegally owned cellphone?

Dumb bill. Very dumb bill.
 
Two teens get into a car accident on a rural road. One is injured, but didn't sustain a major head injury. The other one flew through the wind shield and is unconscious on the ground and gushing blood from their head. So in this hypothetical situation, a teenager would be facing jail time because they did the right thing and called for an ambulance on an illegally owned cellphone?

Dumb bill. Very dumb bill.
About 1 in 250 people in Vermont is a registered sex offender. Now they have easier prey as long as they go after young adults and children when they inevitably reoffend.

Edit: how the hell do they have so many? They don't even have any real cities. I shouldn't dig through crime statistics, they make life not worth living.
 
Can't wait to see Styx's Vermont News video about this. I thought he was being pretty hard on this Todd Howard guy, but after actually getting a look at him for the first time, I don't blame him. He looks like a damn hermit that crawled out of the forest or some shit
 
Goddamnit, I turn my back on the statehouse for a bit and they try this retarded shit. My question is what about the men and women serving in the Vermont National Guard that are under 21? A lot of fresh Privates and Airmen have cell phones and their chain of command uses to establish a recall roster in case shit hits the fan. Not a good look to deprive your servicemembers of basic communication with base when they're not on active duty status. Even less so when some of those 18-20 year olds are active duty soldiers/airmen assigned to the Guard.
Beyond that, there's UVM, Middlebury College, Norwich University, St. Mike's, and a host of other colleges that host interstate or international students, what then? Are they supposed to surrender their cell phones if they're under 21. Utter bullshit.

I'll take my hats now, because I'm fucking mad on the internet.
 
He did this with the intent of proving a point but a place like Vermont would absolutely pass this balls out dumb law while proclaiming "Why didn't we think of this?!" before hitting the paper with a stamp of approval over and over in rapid succession.
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo