Law President Biden pardons his son Hunter Biden - The decision, which was first reported by NBC News, is a reversal for the president, who repeatedly said he would not use his authority to pardon his son or commute his sentence.

Original article: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/joe-biden/joe-biden-issue-pardon-son-hunter-biden-rcna182369



WASHINGTON — Joe Biden pardoned his son Hunter Sunday night, a reversal for the president, who repeatedly said he would not use his executive authority to pardon his son or commute his sentence.

"I believe in the justice system, but as I have wrestled with this, I also believe raw politics has infected this process and it led to a miscarriage of justice — and once I made this decision this weekend, there was no sense in delaying it further. I hope Americans will understand why a father and a President would come to this decision," Biden said in a statement.


Hunter Biden is scheduled to be sentenced on Dec. 12 for his conviction on federal gun charges. He also is set to be sentenced on Dec. 16 in a separate criminal case in which he pleaded guilty to federal tax evasion charges in September.

The pardon is expected to cover both his gun charges conviction and his guilty plea.

A senior White House official told NBC News, which was the first to report on the pardon decision, that the president decided over the weekend to grant his son a pardon and began to inform his senior aides Sunday.

The president also spoke about his son's struggles with addiction in his statement Sunday night, saying that his political opponents were trying to "break" him by going after Hunter.

"No reasonable person who looks at the facts of Hunter’s cases can reach any other conclusion than Hunter was singled out only because he is my son — and that is wrong," Biden said in his statement. "There has been an effort to break Hunter — who has been five and a half years sober, even in the face of unrelenting attacks and selective prosecution. In trying to break Hunter, they’ve tried to break me — and there’s no reason to believe it will stop here. Enough is enough."

Biden, 82, is using his pardon power to ensure Hunter Biden does not spend time in jail as he nears the end of his term in the White House and has no future election to face. In recent months, he has said he would not pardon his son or commute his sentence.

“I will not pardon him,” he said in June after a jury found Hunter Biden guilty on three federal gun charges.

The president has discussed pardoning his son with some of his closest aides at least since Hunter Biden’s conviction in June, said two people with direct knowledge of the discussions about the matter. They said it was decided at the time that he would publicly say he would not pardon his son even though doing so remained on the table.

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters last month that Biden’s position has not changed.

“We’ve been asked that question multiple times. Our answer stands, which is ‘no,’” she said.

Asked Monday whether the president is still committed to not granting clemency for his son, White House spokesperson Andrew Bates said: “The president has spoken to this.” Pressed about whether Biden’s position has changed, Bates replied, “I don’t have anything to add what he said already.”

First lady Jill Biden has also said her husband would not pardon their son.

“Joe and I both respect the judicial system, and that’s the bottom line,” she said in an interview in June.

Hunter Biden’s criminal trial in June was the first involving the child of a sitting president.

Pardoning him after that trial would have ignited a political firestorm for his father, who was campaigning for re-election. Republicans have for years attacked Hunter Biden over his foreign business dealings and accused him and the president of corruption. They have also argued that Hunter Biden was getting special treatment by the Justice Department because of his father’s political power.

GOP criticism reached a peak in July 2023 when Hunter Biden pleaded guilty in a deal with federal prosecutors over the tax and gun charges, which collapsed after a judge raised questions about it. That development led Attorney General Merrick Garland a couple weeks later to appoint the U.S. attorney investigating Hunter Biden, David Weiss, as a special counsel.

Joe Biden dropped out of the presidential race in July, but a pardon before last month's election also could have generated political blowback on the candidacy of Vice President Kamala Harris after she took his place on the Democratic ticket.

Together, the 12 counts Hunter Biden is convicted of or has pleaded guilty to carry a maximum prison sentence of 42 years. But the maximum sentences typically are not given out for convictions of these crimes. The Justice Department has said, for instance, that while the tax charges carry a maximum sentence of 17 years, sentences are typically less than that.

Asked in an interview in June whether he would rule out a pardon for his son, Biden answered, “Yes.”

Days later, after Hunter Biden was convicted on federal gun charges by a jury in his hometown of Wilmington, Delaware, the president said in a statement that he would respect the outcome. He then told reporters he would abide by the jury’s decision.

“I’m extremely proud of my son Hunter,” Biden said. “He has overcome an addiction. He’s one of the brightest, most decent men I know, and I am satisfied that I’m not going to do anything. I said I abide by the jury decision. I will do that, and I will not pardon him.”

Neil Eggleston, who was White House counsel to President Barack Obama, told NBC News that “if I were his White House counsel, I would encourage him to pardon his son.” He said he has not been contacted or consulted by the White House about any pardon preparations.

“The clemency power has few limitations and certainly would extend to a Hunter Biden pardon,” Eggleston said.

Eggleston’s opinion echoes that of other former Justice Department and White House officials previously involved in presidential pardons who told NBC News that they thought Biden should exercise this power in advance of the incoming Trump administration.
 
That’s the retarded term I couldn’t think of earlier. But you can’t pardon someone if they haven’t been convicted or at least tried. Innocent until proven guilty right? So how can you pardon an innocent person?
Watch blanket pardons for anything mostly peaceful protestors did during Floyd Summer until 2028, we can even pardon future crimes!
 
hunter.jpg
 
I honestly don't give a fuck either way. It's hilarious when the same people cheering Trump on for pardoning his son-in-law's father and who support a felon who attempted a coup are suddenly worried about law and order though.
See, when it's Republicans, it's someone's distant cousin in law
When it's Democrats, it's usually direct relation (See: Billy Carter, Roger Clinton)

You're right not to give a fuck, we finally agree on something
 
See, when it's Republicans, it's someone's distant cousin in law
When it's Democrats, it's usually direct relation (See: Billy Carter, Roger Clinton)

You're right not to give a fuck, we finally agree on something
Also, none of those other guys went on record multiple times saying they wouldn't do it, then did it.

That's naked "screw the rules" energy in an ocean of already-existing "skirt the rules" situations.
People like to make this out as some 4D Chess played by Biden to subvert the justice system when the more boring reality is a probably soon to be dead old man didn’t want his last years alive to be with his son locked in prison tbh.
Occam's Razor - sometimes blatant corruption isn't part of a grander scheme, it's just that the people in question don't have a problem with being blatantly corrupt.
 
Well there we go.. the precedent this sets is going to be... ugly! One more step towards the position of PotUS becoming a de-facto elected king.
United States already had Franklin D. Roosevelt as its de-facto not!communist elected king during his reign.
 
Is that part true?
it's generally true that this section is rarely enforced on its own. Weird, when you think about it, given how much we hear about the need for more gun control yet almost no one gets charged for lying to buy a gun.

But, two things. First, while most people don't get charged just with lying on a form, some do. Are we going to see pardons for all of them in the next few weeks? I doubt it.

Second, the reason this sometimes happens is the Al Capone scenario- where the person is guilty of all kinds of shit that can't be proven because they've got enough power to stymie the investigations into their corruption so they get dinged on something related or incidental. Here, that happened twice (because he wasn't nearly as smart as Al Capone, whose brain was being addled by STDs). Biden was involved in all kinds of shady shit with influence peddling, bribery, corruption, but because of who he was doing it with, all they could nail down was the tax fraud (related) and the gun (incidental).

Some, despite previously crowing about the sanctity of the justice system, will claim that was somehow a political prosecution but it's more indicative of someone that both drew attention to himself by tying to profit off his father's elected office (at best!) and was also committing crimes all over the place. How that is somehow deserving of special consideration is beyond me.
 
But you can’t pardon someone if they haven’t been convicted or at least tried.
Why not? The Pardon is a political power that the president can exercise. If you're being wrongfully charged with crimes I have to let you get run through the ringer to make things copacetic? That makes no sense.

Innocent until proven guilty right? So how can you pardon an innocent person?
Innocent people get pardons. Dudes who get wrongly convicted get pardoned from time to time.
 
Anyone actually interested in the historical origins and philosophy behind the pardon power should check out Federalist No. 74 by Alexander Hamilton.

It is a power essential to the chief executive officer (state governor or President), and one of the critical checks and balances necessary to stop the power of a branch of the government, in this case the judiciary, from being unlimited and without recourse for abuse.
 
look at all of the pearlclutching
no one is pearlclutching just laughing at how it exposes you don't really have the moral highground whining about the upjumped trump misdemeanors that everyone with half a brain knows is bs. Its the fact that the biden said his own DOJ does selective prosecution and his own DOJ then rebuking him...... man that just hits the funny bone just right. Hell, even though I don't like the guy it was also then funny and glorious seeing Eric Adams use biden and trump's agreement on how unfair the biden DOJ is to exonerate himself from his charges too!
 
Atrás
Top Abajo