Physicists bring human-scale object to near standstill, reaching a quantum state

Physicists bring human-scale object to near standstill, reaching a quantum state​




To the human eye, most stationary objects appear to be just that—still, and completely at rest. Yet if we were handed a quantum lens, allowing us to see objects at the scale of individual atoms, what was an apple sitting idly on our desk would appear as a teeming collection of vibrating particles, very much in motion.

In the last few decades, physicists have found ways to super-cool objects so that their atoms are at a near standstill, or in their "motional ground state." To date, physicists have wrestled small objects such as clouds of millions of atoms, or nanogram-scale objects, into such pure quantum states.

Now for the first time, scientists at MIT and elsewhere have cooled a large, human-scale object to close to its motional ground state. The object isn't tangible in the sense of being situated at one location, but is the combined motion of four separate objects, each weighing about 40 kilograms. The "object" that the researchers cooled has an estimated mass of about 10 kilograms, and comprises about 1x1026, or nearly 1 octillion, atoms.

The researchers took advantage of the ability of the Laser Interfrometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) to measure the motion of the masses with extreme precision and super-cool the collective motion of the masses to 77 nanokelvins, just shy of the object's predicted ground state of 10 nanokelvins.

Their results, appearing today in Science, represent the largest object to be cooled to close to its motional ground state. The scientists say they now have a chance to observe the effect of gravity on a massive quantum object.

"Nobody has ever observed how gravity acts on massive quantum states," says Vivishek Sudhir, assistant professor of mechanical engineering at MIT, who directed the project. "We've demonstrated how to prepare kilogram-scale objects in quantum states. This finally opens the door to an experimental study of how gravity might affect large quantum objects, something hitherto only dreamed of."

The study's authors are members of the LIGO Laboratory, and include lead author and graduate student Chris Whittle, postdoc Evan Hall, research scientist Sheila Dwyer, Dean of the School of Science and the Curtis and Kathleen Marble Professor of Astrophysics Nergis Mavalvala, and assistant professor of mechanical engineering Vivishek Sudhir.

Precision pushback

All objects embody some sort of motion as a result of the many interactions that atoms have, with each other and from external influences. All this random motion is reflected in an object's temperature. When an object is cooled down close to zero temperature, it still has a residual quantum motion, a state called the "motional ground state."

To stop an object in its tracks, one can exert upon it an equal and opposite force. (Think of stopping a baseball in mid-flight with the force of your glove.) If scientists can precisely measure the magnitude and direction of an atom's movements, they can apply counteracting forces to bring down its temperature—a technique known as feedback cooling.

Physicists have applied feedback cooling through various means, including laser light, to bring individual atoms and ultralight objects to their quantum ground states, and have attempted to super-cool progressively larger objects, to study quantum effects in bigger, traditionally classical systems.

"The fact that something has temperature is a reflection of the idea that it interacts with stuff around it," Sudhir says. "And it's harder to isolate larger objects from all the things happening around them."

To cool the atoms of a large object to near ground state, one would first have to measure their motion with extreme precision, to know the degree of pushback required to stop this motion. Few instruments in the world can reach such precision. LIGO, as it happens, can.

The gravitational-wave-detecting observatory comprises twin interferometers in separate U.S. locations. Each interferometer has two long tunnels connected in an L-shape, and stretching 4 kilometers in either direction. At either end of each tunnel is a 40-kilogram mirror suspended by thin fibers, that swings like a pendulum in response to any disturbance such as an incoming gravitational wave. A laser at the tunnels' nexus is split and sent down each tunnel, then reflected back to its source. The timing of the return lasers tells scientists precisely how much each mirror moved, to an accuracy of 1/10,000 the width of a proton.

Sudhir and his colleagues wondered whether they could use LIGO's motion-measuring precision to first measure the motion of large, human-scale objects, then apply a counteracting force, opposite to what they measure, to bring the objects to their ground state.

Acting back on back-action

The object they aimed to cool is not an individual mirror, but rather the combined motion of all four of LIGO's mirrors.

"LIGO is designed to measure the joint motion of the four 40-kilogram mirrors," Sudhir explains. "It turns out you can map the joint motion of these masses mathematically, and think of them as the motion of a single 10-kilogram object."

When measuring the motion of atoms and other quantum effects, Sudhir says, the very act of measuring can randomly kick the mirror and put it in motion—a quantum effect called "measurement back-action." As individual photons of a laser bounce off a mirror to gather information about its motion, the photon's momentum pushes back on the mirror. Sudhir and his colleagues realized that if the mirrors are continuously measured, as they are in LIGO, the random recoil from past photons can be observed in the information carried by later photons.

Armed with a complete record of both quantum and classical disturbances on each mirror, the researchers applied an equal and opposite force with electromagnets attached to the back of each mirror. The effect pulled the collective motion to a near standstill, leaving the mirrors with so little energy that they moved no more than 10-20 meters, less than one-thousandth the size of a proton.

The team then equated the object's remaining energy, or motion, with temperature, and found the object was sitting at 77 nanokelvins, very close to its motional ground state, which they predict to be 10 nanokelvins.

"This is comparable to the temperature atomic physicists cool their atoms to get to their ground state, and that's with a small cloud of maybe a million atoms, weighing picograms," Sudhir says. "So, it's remarkable that you can cool something so much heavier, to the same temperature."

"Preparing something in the ground state is often the first step to putting it into exciting or exotic quantum states," Whittle says. "So this work is exciting because it might let us study some of these other states, on a mass scale that's never been done before."
 
Yep. That's the thing with modern physics (and to a lesser extent, most of modern science and mathematics): all of the easy problems were solved ages ago. The stuff that's left is either boring and tedious, or interesting and hard-as-fuck.

You're not going to be solving any of those interesting problems without solutions so clever/ridiculous that people will wonder if you were actually fucked out of your mind on meth when you came up with the idea. (And if you're a physicist worth your salt, the answer to that question is yes, anyway.)
I know a dude who decided to major in Physics. After he got his BA he decided working crunch at Rockstar as a QA tester was less liable to cause him to curl up into the fetal position and break out into tears at awareness of his shattered psyche. And no, I'm not joking. True story, 100%.
 
Hell no. It reminds me too much of The Prestige.
Me either. Brutally good film though Bale and Jackman hated one another in real life and were trying to 'out act' one another throughout the whole film, which is why the chemistry on screen seems to frosty and works so well. In the end they sort of become irl friends and do an interview where both Bale and Jackman speak in their normal voice, one a proper aussie and the other a proper cockney. Worth watching
 
Cartoons are not real, and they never will be.

All cartoons being real would be a clusterbomb. One could create cartoons to cancel out or change other cartoons. There can also be different versions of the same cartoon, and other confusing things. People who think "all cartoons are real in another dimension" don't seem to think things through that much.
 
Yeah but, you know, the rotation and orbit of the earth...
This is purely about the vibration of particles and nothing else.
I read somewhere that to effectively teleport material through some kind of quantum entanglement, you need to cool the body you're teleporting to almost absolute zero.

or maybe it was an x files episode.

Either way, cool shit
It would probably be easier to figure out if wormholes actually exist as they're proposed in concept and figure out how to generate them locally with a huge amount of energy than figuring out how to quantum teleport an object and reassemble it properly. Especially a live one.
 
I think what the "teleportation" they've done is just copy states of particles to other particles using lasers, and the process can't really transmit anything faster-than-light.
Ah i see. I know they did some crazy shit with quantum entanglement but that whole area of physics is just too magic for me to wrap my head around. Like trying to teach a chimp how a car works. I understand the words, the rest is 🤷‍♂️

Edit: NASA reckon they can go FTL but not faster than lightspeed (cause:effect)
 
Ah i see. I know they did some crazy shit with quantum entanglement but that whole area of physics is just too magic for me to wrap my head around. Like trying to teach a chimp how a car works. I understand the words, the rest is 🤷‍♂️

Edit: NASA reckon they can go FTL but not faster than lightspeed (cause:effect)
Isn't the whole proposed FTL thing basically to completely ignore the law that anything cannot go faster than light "in the universe" by generating a pocket technically not in it to 'travel' faster than light in, possibly also avoiding the time dilation effects? Pretty sure there's no evidence for it yet but that at least makes more sense than the alternative.
 
Isn't the whole proposed FTL thing basically to completely ignore the law that anything cannot go faster than light "in the universe" by generating a pocket technically not in it to 'travel' faster than light in, possibly also avoiding the time dilation effects? Pretty sure there's no evidence for it yet but that at least makes more sense than the alternative.
There's two FTL's at play. One is the speed of light (three hundred million metres per second) the other is cause and effect. One is Einstein's theory of E=MC² (from what i understand) the other is that you cannot be the effect before the cause. For example, you can't be spilled milk without knocking over the glass.

IIRC NASA managed to travel faster than the speed of light (300 blah blah blah) using a super-conductive disc and, well, magic. Something about super-cooling material so you can trick it in to moving faster than it would do if it was vibrating at full speed.

I'll be honest, my memory is like a Player-Piano with a few keys missing; every now and then you get a recognisable tune, the rest of the time it's random notes here and there.
 
generating a pocket technically not in it to 'travel' faster than light in

The hypothetical Alcubierre drive creates a "warp bubble" to go faster-than-light by warping spacetime.

But I hear problems are it needs negative matter or negative energy to work, there may be no way to turn the bubble off once it's on, the bubble at FTL could release a massive amount of destructive energy at the destination if it could be turned off, and the inside of the bubble could be fried with Hawking radiation at the highest possible temperature if the bubble goes FTL. Hawking proposed a "chronology protection conjecture" that maybe natural laws just don't want backwards time travel or faster-than-light travel.*

*(the theory is that if one exists the other exists)
 
One is Einstein's theory of E=MC² (from what i understand)
To expend on this because it's interesting. E=mc^2 is the rest energy of some mass. The equation for energy that has some velocity is E = mc^2 /sqrt (1-(v^2/c^2)). From this equation you get the limit on mass traveling at the speed of light because it will have infinite energy, meaning it took infinite energy to get that way, violating the whole conservation of energy thing.
 
The hypothetical Alcubierre drive creates a "warp bubble" to go faster-than-light by warping spacetime.

But I hear problems are it needs negative matter or negative energy to work, there may be no way to turn the bubble off once it's on, the bubble could release a massive amount of destructive energy at the destination if it could be turned off, and the inside of the bubble could be fried with Hawking radiation at the highest possible temperature if the bubble goes FTL. Hawking proposed a "chronology protection conjecture" that maybe natural laws just don't want backwards time travel or faster-than-light travel.*

*(the theory is that if one exists the other can exist)
If the other problems could be solved, wouldn't the massive energy issue just mean you'd have to park outside of a solar system and travel the rest of the way slower? Would still save a lot of time. Unless we're talking about such a huge amount of energy you couldn't even be near anything else as in astronomical units away.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo