Philippines leader likens himself to Hitler

Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/09/30/dute...ler-wants-to-kill-millions-of-drug-users.html


Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte appeared to liken himself to Nazi leader Adolf Hitler on Friday and said he would "be happy" to exterminate three million drug users and peddlers in the country.

In a rambling speech on his arrival in Davao City after a visit to Vietnam, Duterte told reporters that he had been "portrayed to be some cousin of Hitler" by critics.

Noting that Hitler had murdered millions of Jews, Duterte said: "There are three million drug addicts (in the Philippines). I'd be happy to slaughter them.

"If Germany had Hitler, the Philippineswould have...," he said, pausing and pointing to himself.

"You know my victims. I would like (them) to be all criminals to finish the problem of my country and save the next generation from perdition."

Duterte was voted to power in a May election on the back of a vow to end drugs and corruption in the country of 100 million people. He took office on June 30 and over 3,100 people have been killed since then, mostly drug users and peddlers, in police operations and in vigilante killings.
 
hugo-chavez-05.jpg


Also Druggie lives don't matter.
Implying a man out to massacre three million of his own people'll be discriminating.
 
Have you ever been to Brazil or Mexico? Drug dealers and users are degenerates that deserve to be removed for the better of their countries. they need to follow Duerte's example.

Maybe, but it's much more important to get rid of the real degenerates first: anime fans.
 
Maybe, but it's much more important to get rid of the real degenerates first: anime fans.
I agree!

Hopefully westerners protest this happening some more. I want to see scruffy looking youths wearing communist/socialist related clothes and accessories while protesting this cutting away of the dead wood. Because we all know what type of person is first of the chopping block (literally) when the reds take control.
 
His enforcer says they're at war and no regrets about the killings.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/dutertes-enforcer-says-war-no-regrets-killings-065135277.html


LA UNION, Philippines (Reuters) - When Philippines police chief Ronald Dela Rosa gave a rousing speech to his men at a regional headquarters in Luzon, they rewarded him with a gift: a replica of the sword used by actor Mel Gibson in the movie Braveheart.

The barrel-chested police chief grinned and gave the weapon, which is almost as long as he is tall, a practice swing. A voice on the camp's loudspeaker declared him "the bravest of bravehearts".


Dela Rosa acts as the enforcer for Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte, whose war on drugs has led to more than 3,400 people being killed in just over three months.

Dela Rosa's tour of Luzon, the country's largest and most populous island, was the latest in a series of trips to stiffen the resolve of police officers at the campaign's bloody frontline.

"I have to encourage them to do our job," he told a Reuters reporter who went on the trip last month. "We are at war."

Police said on October 3 they had shot dead 1,375 people in operations since President Duterte took office on July 1. They also report a further 2,066 "deaths under investigation", many of which human rights activists attribute to vigilante killings.

Reuters was unable to confirm the accuracy of these numbers or the extent to which the killings have been committed by vigilantes.

The campaign has sparked outrage abroad, but in the Philippines it has won praise from a crime-weary population and only muted criticism from civil society groups.

In a country where the police are generally despised and feared because of their reputation for corruption and violence, Dela Rosa is popular. After only two months as police chief, the national media is already touting him as Duterte's possible successor, an idea that the president's spokesman Martin Andanar described as "speculative".

Duterte has often called for the killing of drug dealers. And Dela Rosa has echoed the incendiary remarks. At a speech last month, he encouraged users and pushers to kill drug lords who had grown rich from exploiting the poor.

"You know who are the drug lords here, go to their houses, pour gasoline, set it on fire, show them you are angry at them," he said.

Still, Dela Rosa's close operational knowledge of the drug war could make him a focus if there is ever an independent investigation into the killings, said Rose Trajano, secretary general of the Philippine Alliance of Human Rights Advocates, a nationwide coalition based in Manila. It is unclear, though, whether anyone will be in a position to hold such an investigation.

"He is a good soldier of the president, but there will also be fear in him," she said.

Dela Rosa told Reuters he was confident that killings during police operations were legitimate, and that the "deaths under investigation" were mostly the work of drug syndicates. "They are killing each other," he said.

FEELS THE PRESSURE

In person, Dela Rosa is intense but courteous, and says he is under pressure.

"My worry is that I won't be able to deliver what is expected of me," he told Reuters.

Duterte vowed on September 18 he would extend his anti-drug campaign for another six months, but Dela Rosa said he still felt pressed for time.

The biggest obstacles to the campaign, he said, were providing rehab services for the many users of crystal methamphetamine, a highly addictive drug known locally as shabu, and halting its influx from abroad, particularly the flow from China.

More than 700,000 drug users and pushers have registered with the authorities in a process termed "surrendering". But there are very few programs or facilities to help most of them, and local media have reported the killing of scores of people who have registered.

Dela Rosa told Reuters the number of drug-war killings would continue to rise. "Every day the number of dead increases," he said. "Every day the arrests increase and those who surrender."

Dela Rosa bristles at the mention of foreign critics. The United States has said it is "deeply concerned" by the killings, while two United Nations experts have accused Duterte of incitement to violence, a crime under international law.

"They're making us out to be killers," said Dela Rosa. "It really broke my heart. We're doing this for the good of the Filipino people."

Before the anti-drug campaign, he said, people were scared to leave their houses. "Now the situation has been reversed. Law-abiding people are going out. Criminals are hiding. See the difference?"

But while other serious crime has declined, the murder rate has soared, and in some communities residents told Reuters that police and vigilante killings had made them too frightened to go outside after dark.

"WE BECAME FRIENDS"

Dela Rosa, 54 – whose earliest ambition was to be a boxer - is popularly known as "Bato", after his hometown south of Davao City. It also means "rock" in the national language Tagalog.

His late father was a pedicab driver who could barely afford to send him to school, said Dela Rosa in a tribute on his Facebook page in June.

Davao City is where President Duterte spent 22 years as mayor, unleashing a brutal anti-drugs campaign that the hard-charging Dela Rosa joined as he rose through the ranks of the local police force.

"I liked what he was doing and he liked what I was doing, so we became friends," Dela Rosa recalled. Duterte made him Davao's police chief in 2012.

The Coalition Against Summary Execution, a Davao-based watchdog, has documented 1,424 vigilante-style killings in the city, including 162 in 2012-13 when Dela Rosa was chief.

Asked about the findings, Dela Rosa said: "I will look into that." Adding: "I don't memorize that data."

Duterte appointed Dela Rosa his national police chief over other more senior officers, giving him free rein to roll out Davao's harsh crime-fighting model across the country.

GUN COLLECTOR

At a police camp in Baguio, in the Philippines' ethnically diverse highlands, Dela Rosa donned a tribal headdress and robe to hand out awards to officers for their anti-drug efforts.

Hundreds of officers asked to take selfies with Dela Rosa, who always obliged. Sometimes only his trademark shaven head was visible amid a scrum of well-wishers.

However, even in the police camps, Dela Rosa is circled by six bodyguards. Drug traffickers, he told Reuters, "can kill me anytime".

Dela Rosa said in an interview with popular Philippines talkshow host Boy Abunda that he twice tried marijuana at college and got high but decided to stop because it could ruin his future.

In another of his regular television appearances, this time on a show called "Get It Straight", Dela Rosa declined to say how many people he had shot in his police career "because people might say the (police) chief is a killer."

Filipino journalists covering Dela Rosa told Reuters they have never seen him smoke or drink. His main hobby is collecting guns.

"He loves guns," said Police Chief Superintendent Aaron Aquino, who served with him in Davao and now commands central Luzon, a region that has clocked up about 500 drug-war killings. "Every time he sees a good gun he buys it."
 
Have you ever been to Brazil or Mexico? Drug dealers and users are degenerates that deserve to be removed for the better of their countries. they need to follow Duerte's example.

Not really, considering that Dueterte a) is a moron and b) compared himself to a dictator who happened to a be a drug addict himself.
 
Now he likens himself to Netanyahu

http://www.msn.com/en-ph/news/natio...nyahu-he-doesnt-care-about-america/ar-BBwYIaw

President Rodrigo Duterte spoke before the Jewish community in Makati City on Tuesday, likening himself to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over how they both defy the influence of the United States on the two countries.

Duterte reiterated his apology to the Jewish community after his comments on killing drug addicts in the Philippines, which caused an international firestorm after he referenced Adolf Hitler, whose Nazi regime slayed more than six million Jews during the Holocaust.

But the speech quickly turned into another chapter of Duterte's tirade against the United States, the United Nations, and other critics, who have raised the alarm over the rising death toll in the administration's drug war.

Duterte then referenced Netanyahu, noting their similar defiance.

"You have a president, Netanyahu... he doesn't care about America," said Duterte.

"Do they ever chastise Netanyahu? No," he added.

The relationship between Obama and Netanyahu has been famously rocky.

Last March, Netanyahu turned down a meeting with Obama during his visit to the United States. Instead, the Israeli leader urged Congress to vote against the nuclear deal that Obama had struck up with Iran.

But tensions seemed to ease last month after the two leaders sat down in New York, where they discussed the potential of a peace deal with Palestine.

Meanwhile, a scheduled Duterte-Obama meeting at last month's Association of Southeast Asian (ASEAN) Summit was canceled after the Philippine leader's profanity-laced response to a question over possibly discussing human rights issues during their talk.

Duterte has since spoken out regularly about the US, a treaty ally of the Philippines, saying he will pursue an independent foreign policy.
 
What's wrong with Netanyahu? I mean, politicians are rotten, but is he really worse to be compared to than Hitler?

Definitely not.

It's just that he's now managed to piss off anyone who actually admired him for comparing himself to Hitler. All he really needs now is to compare himself to Kim Jong-Un to complete the trifecta of PR fail.
 
This article says that Duterte's actions and attitude could threaten the peace in Southeast Asia.

http://qz.com/789306/philippine-pre...-in-southeast-asia/?utm_source=YPL&yptr=yahoo


US efforts to promote peace and stability in the South China Sea are facing a new challenge. This time, the difficulty comes not from China but from the leader of a US treaty ally—president Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines.

In recent weeks, the US-Philippine alliance has come under strain as Duterte has rebuked the United States and threatened drastic changes in Philippine foreign policy. His volatile behavior threatens the alliance, president Obama’s strategy for “rebalancing” US foreign policy in Asia, and the stability of the Southeast Asian strategic landscape.

How is incendiary rhetoric like Duterte’s likely to affect a strong defense partnership and regional security more broadly? This is the kind of question my research on the international relations of the Asia-Pacific addresses.

Duterte’s outbursts
Since taking office in late June, Duterte has launched a ruthless domestic war on drugs and declared that he doesn’t “care about human rights.” Those critical of his policies have met with his sharp, uninhibited tongue. “F-ck you,” he most recently told his critics in the European Union.

Senior officials from the United States, a treaty ally since 1951, have not been spared. Even mild US criticism has irritated Duterte’s thin skin, prompting him to describe US secretary of state John Kerry as “crazy” and call president Barack Obama a “son of a whore.” He has chided the United States as a former colonial power, announced plans to expel US special forces engaged in counter-terrorism training, halted joint patrols in the South China Sea, and said he would consider buying arms from China and Russia.

The line between Duterte’s bombast and real policy views is unclear. He has already backtracked from his pledge to expel US special forces and said the Philippines needs the United States in the South China Sea. Still, his volatility threatens the US-Philippine alliance, the strongest check against unilateral Chinese expansion in the South China Sea.

Reorienting the Philippines?
Duterte’s pledge to recalibrate Philippine foreign policy is not surprising.

Under his predecessor Benigno Aquino, the feud between China and the Philippines in the South China Sea intensified. Both states prize the sea’s hydrocarbon deposits, large fisheries, and vital shipping lanes. The dispute over sovereignty also activates nationalist sentiment, as Cornell professor Jessica Chen Weiss and I stress in recent research. China’s launch of an island-building campaign in the South China Sea added fuel to the fire.

As tension in the South China Sea rose, the US-Philippine alliance strengthened to a level not seen since the Cold War. Arms sales, joint exercises, and training increased, and a 2014 agreement gave US troops extended access to Philippine military facilities.

Not all Filipinos approved. Some derided the added US military presence as an affront to sovereignty that would alienate Beijing without providing effective protection. As I argued in my book The Limits of Alignment, fears of losing autonomy and antagonizing foreign rivals are the most common reasons why Southeast Asian governments seek to limit their strategic relationships with great powers like China and the United States. Some analysts thus welcomed early indications that Duterte would pursue more “balanced relations” with China and the United States.

What has alarmed diplomats and strategists is the bold, inconsistent, and temperamental nature of Duterte’s foreign policy pronouncements. At times his reputation for impulsive speech is helpful diplomatically. It enables embarrassed Philippine officials and nervous international partners to downplay his remarks as hyperbole, as his aides did after he threatened to withdraw from the United Nations in August. Still, his comments have to be taken seriously. Many observers discounted Duterte’s campaign promises to employ brutal anti-drug tactics. With more than 3,500suspected drug dealers killed since the start of July, his remarks were clearly more than electoral bluster.

Discord between Duterte’s rhetoric and the views of the security establishment add further uncertainty. In mid-September, as Duterte railed against American colonial abuses, the head of the Philippine armed services insisted that the alliance is “rock solid.” The possibility of abrupt moves or domestic fracture in the Philippines raises real dangers to regional stability.

As defense secretary Ash Carter has stressed, a strengthened US-Philippine alliance is key to US engagement in Southeast Asia. It represents a means for projecting American force and maintaining a larger regional presence over time. Just as importantly, it is a vehicle for demonstrating US credibility and commitment to the region as China’s waxing power and assertiveness test US resolve.

Duterte’s threats to expel US special forces, cease joint patrols, and buy arms from China greatly complicate the implementation of the 2014 US-Philippine defense agreement.

The United States does have other means to maintain a strong naval presence in Southeast Asia if cooperation stalls. For example, the US regularly rotates naval warships through Singapore. But the United States has a clear disinterest in seeing one of its oldest Asian allies turn down American military protection in favor of direct talks with Beijing over the South China Sea. As a result, US officials have been loath to criticize Duterte’s domestic abuses or foreign policy plans too sharply.

Chinese responses
For its part, the Chinese government has welcomed Duterte’s pronouncements cautiously.

In state-owned media, Chinese analysts initially lauded Duterte’s plans to abandon Aquino’s “lopsided” and “unscrupulous”China policy, but later remarked on his “reckless comments” and the Philippines’ “uncertain future” under his leadership. A September meeting between Duterte and Chinese premier Li Keqiang yielded cordial pledges to pursue better ties, but a breakthrough was not clearly in sight.

Chinese officials seem to recognize that volatile leaders can swing in more than one direction. Moreover, anti-China nationalist sentiment is widespread in the Philippines and among the military leadership, constraining Duterte’s ability to compromise. His high approval ratings—91% at the end of July—do not ensure that his harsh domestic policies or swings in foreign policy will not come back to haunt him.

Regional repercussions
Despite Duterte’s domestic constraints, his embrace of bilateral talks is a boon for Beijing. China prefers to deal with smaller rival claimants over the South China Sea one by one. By contrast, the Philippines, Vietnam, and several other Southeast Asian states have tried to “internationalize” the South China Sea dispute by involving the United States and “multilateralize” it by discussing it in regional forums where weaker states can pool their weight.

Vietnam will suffer if Duterte spurns the United States and bypasses multilateral talks. Vietnam needs a strong US security presence as a counterweight to China. However, the ideological gap and legacy of mistrust between Hanoi and Washington prevent Vietnam from hosting robust US forces itself. If the Philippine-US alliance weakens, Vietnam will have little choice but to adopt a more accommodating posture toward Beijing.

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations and its members will also suffer indirectly as Duterte’s shift undermines efforts to manage the South China Sea issue multilaterally. These currents will be difficult to reverse.

The adverse consequences of Duterte’s approach may be greatest in the Philippines. With weak independent naval capacity and growing economic dependency on China, Philippine leverage in the South China Sea talks is limited. Concessions could prove explosive domestically. Should Duterte alienate the United States and embrace China, he may well arouse domestic pressure to take a hard line toward Beijing without the means to enforce one—a dangerous position at home and abroad.

While Duterte has planted the seeds of instability, he need not let them grow. The US government and other Philippine partners will likely be willing to treat his recent remarks as products of a bad temper and a populist political campaign. That gives Duterte a second chance to expound a more calculated, pragmatic, and well-scripted foreign policy.
 
This article says that Duterte's actions and attitude could threaten the peace in Southeast Asia.

http://qz.com/789306/philippine-pre...-in-southeast-asia/?utm_source=YPL&yptr=yahoo


US efforts to promote peace and stability in the South China Sea are facing a new challenge. This time, the difficulty comes not from China but from the leader of a US treaty ally—president Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines.

We really don't give that much of a shit about the Philippines. Good luck facing off with China about those disputed islands without us!

Seriously, some punk like this running his mouth is just a yapping little dog and we laugh at him. Ahhh, look at the cute little chihuahua!
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo