Disaster Pete Buttigieg will be the next president. Here’s why. - All hail President Faggot.


The 2028 presidential election is a long way away. Right now, most of us are stressing about the midterms, especially in the wake of the recent Supreme Court ruling dismantling part of the Voting Rights Act.

But when we’re looking for hope under Donald Trump, it’s good to look at the long term. Despite it being so far away, short of any shocking revelations I’ve failed to predict, I feel like I’m already ready to call the 2028 presidential election for Pete Buttigieg.

Now that isn’t necessarily an endorsement of him over every other candidate. But I do think that Buttigieg is the most likely person to win the 2028 election in a time when politics has become so much about us and them, fighting tooth and nail, and throwing any care for the truth out of the window.

Of course, Buttigieg hasn’t announced that he’s running for president yet. But he’s made it pretty clear that he plans to, including getting caught out when trying to avoid the question from Stephen Colbert.

Buttigieg manages to represent a good middle of the road, but also somehow seems to encompass the whole road. When he ran in 2019, he was more conservative on economic policy and his approach to the military than some of us might have liked.

In the last seven years, Buttigieg has had plenty of time and experience to evolve and has slightly more radical approaches to some of those issues. In that time, he’s worked in the White House alongside former President Joe Biden, and Trump has shown us all a truly horrific vision for America.

Speaking about his experience over the last few years on Colbert recently, he said: “I feel that I’m a moderate ideologically, but it’s kind of radicalized me about the condition of our institutions.” That “moderate ideology” might mean he’s not an ideal candidate for the far left, but with some of his more active ideas and his move to call out the Democratic party for inaction, it’s believable they’d hold their nose and vote for him.

But the crucial element of Buttigieg’s potential to win the presidency comes from how he has reached into the homes of hardcore Republican voters and held his own through his countless Fox News interviews. At a time when political division rules and having reasonable discourse seems impossible, he’s managed to do just that. Buttigieg hasn’t held back about Trump, but in a way that means he has the chance to really pull over some swing voters and even lifelong Republicans who are tired of Trump and his MAGA cult.

But it’s not just that Buttigieg is a strong candidate in his own right. It’s that the rest of the field just doesn’t hold many strong contenders to take him on.

On the Republican side of the aisle, the idea of any of them winning the presidency in 2028 after Trump has tanked the economy and gone to war with Iran just doesn’t hold up to reasonable scrutiny. Anti-trans fearmongering isn’t going to win him enough votes (the erosion of the Voting Rights Act and his attempts to suppress large swathes of the electorate aside).

If Trump tries to run for a third term, constitutionalist Republicans aren’t going to put up with that. Trump has driven his own approval ratings down the toilet, and his machinations over the last decade have left the Republican Party light on people ready to stand up with conviction.

Nobody likes JD Vance. Coming off the cult of Trump, it seems unlikely that someone as milquetoast as Mike Pence could mount any sort of reasonable campaign (it didn’t work well in 2024).

Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) is retiring. Former Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) will be in his 80s. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Secretary of State Marco Rubio might make swings for it, but they don’t have a good track record when it comes to presidential elections and aren’t helped by the way that Trump has gone after each of them in the past.

After that, you start looking at Trump’s Cabinet of former Fox News hosts, and if they even make it to the end of his term, it’s hard to imagine them making a serious bid for the presidency.

On top of that, anyone who tries to run for the presidency on a Republican ticket after Trump will have to deal with the curse of the MAGA cult. They’ll either have to court Trump’s old base while the rest of the Republican Party is fed up with them and Trump’s old tactics. Or they have to disavow that base and have the MAGA crowd – and its pundits – mad at them in return. Balancing the two sides of that coin doesn’t seem feasible.

The Democrats have a similar problem, though. There are more options for a primary, but I suspect Buttigieg still has a lead. A lot of the old contenders are closer to retirement than running for president. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) is looking to effect change behind the scenes rather than run. Sen. Corey Booker (D-NJ) “hasn’t dismissed” a 2028 bid, and his record-breaking filibuster might make him a good contender, but he hasn’t put in the same work that Buttigieg seems to have been laying down for the last few years.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom has made a name for himself lately, especially with a social media team that has emulated Trump’s posting style to mock him. But that has likely alienated a lot of swing voters who don’t want to see more of the same, and he’s overly centrist and less likely to pull in the far-left vote.

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer has quietly shown her strengths, but hasn’t stepped out in the national public eye much to make headway ahead of a bid. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz seems hesitant about stepping back into that fray. And the idea of former Vice President Kamala Harris running again after 2024 seems unlikely.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) has been a lot of people’s dream candidate since long before she was old enough to run. While she has a good social media game, her more direct approach to many issues has made her too easy a target for Republicans, and the pundits are too well-practiced at painting a target on her and making viewers believe that she’s an extremist.

That’s why Buttigieg’s Fox News appearances have been so crucial to his chances. Just like how it’ll be hard to convince voters that the economy is great when they can’t afford groceries and gas, it’ll be hard to convince them that Buttigieg is a radical leftist extremist when he’s appeared on their TV regularly and made some great points in the face of hostile Republican questions.

Buttigieg’s push to play the wider field hasn’t always worked. Last year, he slipped on trans sports participation, and that was a big disappointment. He needs to do better on things like that. As a candidate, he’ll get asked about trans people in the next election, and he needs to be unequivocal once the campaign starts. But he’s the sort of communicator who can probably excel at highlighting the nonsense that underlies so many of those questions when the time comes.

When it comes to electability, Buttigieg is a military vet with a family, and compared to Trump, his character must be effectively unimpeachable. The only thing that Republicans might hold against him is his sexuality, so we just have to hope that by 2028, America is ready to elect an out gay man.
 
Imagine being the party of enforced inclusivity, including Muslims under that umbrella, and then getting mad when the gay guy doesn't get elected President (because you know that will happen), and then blaming straight white guys for homophobia.

I don't believe particularly that white people in general are homophobic. But I do believe there's a certain amount of backlash that comes from being blamed for the lack of "success" of certain minorities that perpetuates that lack of success.

Buttigieg will never be President unless the Democrats decide to enact a coup. And even then...is he really the guy that they would choose to lead the glorious revolution?
 
I would have said that the DNC doesn’t have it in the bag what with them banning the fag flag in their two enclaves and protest voting for the Green Party in response to Kamala. But Trump has gone so mask off with the ZOG shit they’ll jump right back.
Something I find interesting is that Republicans actually won the Muslim vote in 2000, and won enough of them to flip Michigan in 2024. So the basic GOP platform isn't even repellent to Muslims -many own small businesses and virtually all are socially conservative- it's just the Zionism and Middle-east wars that are a turnoff.
 
Buttigieg will never be President unless the Democrats decide to enact a coup. And even then...is he really the guy that they would choose to lead the glorious revolution?

They already managed to get a senile man physically unable to campaign in without consequences, if anything Buttigieg's coup will br easier to explain away. And besides, a weakling is better for Them as shown by Biden's term.
 
While it won't be an issue in Blue States, running a gay dude is going to be extremely problematic amongst religious, male, elderly, and minority voters. You might not care for blue collar Purple states, but if you hadn't noticed the last few elections have been decided by them with relatively small margins. You are also going to galvanize conservative voters to vote against him, making the House an uphill battle. Imagine having a minority-driven strategy, then trying to convince Muslims in Michigan, steel workers in Pennsylvanian, the elderly in Arizona or Florida, blacks in Georgia, or Hispanics in Texas to vote for him.
His other problem is that he's just a dog for the DNC that they put in every primary to put on the act that they have multiple real candidates with diverse positions within the party when they don't. I've already spoken ad nauseam about the DNC's obsession with total party unity and how it prevents them from having candidates with real and unique positions that actually represent the different beliefs within the party. The only unique trait he has is that he believes that we should have mandatory military service. Now tell me, who in the fuck is voting for a literal faggot that wants mandatory military service? Another problem of his is that he's simply not approachable by most due to his highly educated background meaning that he's only gonna appeal to the wealthy and highly educated democrats. Every election from 2008 onwards has shown that appealing to the high wealth + high education demographic never wins you elections (this is why Kamala Harris lost) so putting up a guy who would attract the same people as Kamala Harris and then narrowing down that group even more due to the mandatory military service shit means that you'll lose an election instantly.
This is why homosexual men have been relegated to the positions in government that aren't gained via public elections such as secretaries of federal agencies and all that. Homosexual women don't do anything in politics because they're retards and literally every QOL statistic ever backs me up on this.
 
They already managed to get a senile man physically unable to campaign in without consequences, if anything Buttigieg's coup will br easier to explain away. And besides, a weakling is better for Them as shown by Biden's term.
A senile man with a history of longevity and was part of an administration that people liked. There's nothing people like more than familiarity.

Buttegieg was at best part of a middling administration that lost to Donald Trump, and on top of everything, is gay, which loses a LOT of people that might otherwise have voted Democrat (especially non-white men whose cultures simply don't like gays).
 
Nonwhites will never vote for a faggot.
Nawt truuu, Chosenites would love the shit out of him.

Butt-gag the first Gay President. Like poetry it rhymes.

Damn it, the Democrats really don't have a single candidate that isn't a joke or universally hated like Newscum?

Can't they Biden up Bernie? I don't want Preisdent Poojeet Vance.
 
If you want to threaten a public figure, that’s one thing, but going after their children is quite another.

(C&Ped from another board)

Hang on tight; this one’s really disgusting.

Pete Buttigieg got swatted, specifically by someone who placed a so-far anonymous call to CPS stating that they had reason to believe he was harming his children. Long story made short: They sent the kids to Chasten’s parents for the night, and when the police and CPS officers came back the next to interview them, said there was no evidence that the children were in danger.

https://www.npr.org/2026/06/26/nx-s1-5872821/pete-buttigi

I saw on MSNOW that Pete said he hadn’t been as frightened in his life, except shortly after his son’s adoption, when the boy got really sick and had to be put on a ventilator. The call is believed to have originated from a town in Alabama where Pete said he’s never been.

p.s. This is not the same as calling in a case if you have reason to believe a child may be in danger, and the allegation is unfounded.
 
If you want to threaten a public figure, that’s one thing, but going after their children is quite another.

(C&Ped from another board)

Hang on tight; this one’s really disgusting.

Pete Buttigieg got swatted, specifically by someone who placed a so-far anonymous call to CPS stating that they had reason to believe he was harming his children. Long story made short: They sent the kids to Chasten’s parents for the night, and when the police and CPS officers came back the next to interview them, said there was no evidence that the children were in danger.

https://www.npr.org/2026/06/26/nx-s1-5872821/pete-buttigi

I saw on MSNOW that Pete said he hadn’t been as frightened in his life, except shortly after his son’s adoption, when the boy got really sick and had to be put on a ventilator. The call is believed to have originated from a town in Alabama where Pete said he’s never been.

p.s. This is not the same as calling in a case if you have reason to believe a child may be in danger, and the allegation is unfounded.
All the comments in yeet's post are blaming Hasan and his orbiters :story:
 
Actually, this is a great thought experiment. Let’s say you had a presidential candidate. Not Pete, because he sucks, but like a candidate who was perfect in every single way, but was insanely gay. I’m not talking normal gay, but like, getting his neg-hole pozzed from dudes daily in a bathhouse. Like. Did nothing in his free time but try to consume other dudes semen at various glory holes.

Would you vote for him? I don’t think I could. It would be weird to see that dude go on various diplomatic travels and constantly be putting random mens ballsacks in his mouth on the daily.
Absolutely not. Even if such a man was impeccable his degenerate nature has no place whatsoever in the most powerful elected position on the planet.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo