Disaster Pete Buttigieg will be the next president. Here’s why. - All hail President Faggot.


The 2028 presidential election is a long way away. Right now, most of us are stressing about the midterms, especially in the wake of the recent Supreme Court ruling dismantling part of the Voting Rights Act.

But when we’re looking for hope under Donald Trump, it’s good to look at the long term. Despite it being so far away, short of any shocking revelations I’ve failed to predict, I feel like I’m already ready to call the 2028 presidential election for Pete Buttigieg.

Now that isn’t necessarily an endorsement of him over every other candidate. But I do think that Buttigieg is the most likely person to win the 2028 election in a time when politics has become so much about us and them, fighting tooth and nail, and throwing any care for the truth out of the window.

Of course, Buttigieg hasn’t announced that he’s running for president yet. But he’s made it pretty clear that he plans to, including getting caught out when trying to avoid the question from Stephen Colbert.

Buttigieg manages to represent a good middle of the road, but also somehow seems to encompass the whole road. When he ran in 2019, he was more conservative on economic policy and his approach to the military than some of us might have liked.

In the last seven years, Buttigieg has had plenty of time and experience to evolve and has slightly more radical approaches to some of those issues. In that time, he’s worked in the White House alongside former President Joe Biden, and Trump has shown us all a truly horrific vision for America.

Speaking about his experience over the last few years on Colbert recently, he said: “I feel that I’m a moderate ideologically, but it’s kind of radicalized me about the condition of our institutions.” That “moderate ideology” might mean he’s not an ideal candidate for the far left, but with some of his more active ideas and his move to call out the Democratic party for inaction, it’s believable they’d hold their nose and vote for him.

But the crucial element of Buttigieg’s potential to win the presidency comes from how he has reached into the homes of hardcore Republican voters and held his own through his countless Fox News interviews. At a time when political division rules and having reasonable discourse seems impossible, he’s managed to do just that. Buttigieg hasn’t held back about Trump, but in a way that means he has the chance to really pull over some swing voters and even lifelong Republicans who are tired of Trump and his MAGA cult.

But it’s not just that Buttigieg is a strong candidate in his own right. It’s that the rest of the field just doesn’t hold many strong contenders to take him on.

On the Republican side of the aisle, the idea of any of them winning the presidency in 2028 after Trump has tanked the economy and gone to war with Iran just doesn’t hold up to reasonable scrutiny. Anti-trans fearmongering isn’t going to win him enough votes (the erosion of the Voting Rights Act and his attempts to suppress large swathes of the electorate aside).

If Trump tries to run for a third term, constitutionalist Republicans aren’t going to put up with that. Trump has driven his own approval ratings down the toilet, and his machinations over the last decade have left the Republican Party light on people ready to stand up with conviction.

Nobody likes JD Vance. Coming off the cult of Trump, it seems unlikely that someone as milquetoast as Mike Pence could mount any sort of reasonable campaign (it didn’t work well in 2024).

Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) is retiring. Former Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) will be in his 80s. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Secretary of State Marco Rubio might make swings for it, but they don’t have a good track record when it comes to presidential elections and aren’t helped by the way that Trump has gone after each of them in the past.

After that, you start looking at Trump’s Cabinet of former Fox News hosts, and if they even make it to the end of his term, it’s hard to imagine them making a serious bid for the presidency.

On top of that, anyone who tries to run for the presidency on a Republican ticket after Trump will have to deal with the curse of the MAGA cult. They’ll either have to court Trump’s old base while the rest of the Republican Party is fed up with them and Trump’s old tactics. Or they have to disavow that base and have the MAGA crowd – and its pundits – mad at them in return. Balancing the two sides of that coin doesn’t seem feasible.

The Democrats have a similar problem, though. There are more options for a primary, but I suspect Buttigieg still has a lead. A lot of the old contenders are closer to retirement than running for president. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) is looking to effect change behind the scenes rather than run. Sen. Corey Booker (D-NJ) “hasn’t dismissed” a 2028 bid, and his record-breaking filibuster might make him a good contender, but he hasn’t put in the same work that Buttigieg seems to have been laying down for the last few years.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom has made a name for himself lately, especially with a social media team that has emulated Trump’s posting style to mock him. But that has likely alienated a lot of swing voters who don’t want to see more of the same, and he’s overly centrist and less likely to pull in the far-left vote.

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer has quietly shown her strengths, but hasn’t stepped out in the national public eye much to make headway ahead of a bid. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz seems hesitant about stepping back into that fray. And the idea of former Vice President Kamala Harris running again after 2024 seems unlikely.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) has been a lot of people’s dream candidate since long before she was old enough to run. While she has a good social media game, her more direct approach to many issues has made her too easy a target for Republicans, and the pundits are too well-practiced at painting a target on her and making viewers believe that she’s an extremist.

That’s why Buttigieg’s Fox News appearances have been so crucial to his chances. Just like how it’ll be hard to convince voters that the economy is great when they can’t afford groceries and gas, it’ll be hard to convince them that Buttigieg is a radical leftist extremist when he’s appeared on their TV regularly and made some great points in the face of hostile Republican questions.

Buttigieg’s push to play the wider field hasn’t always worked. Last year, he slipped on trans sports participation, and that was a big disappointment. He needs to do better on things like that. As a candidate, he’ll get asked about trans people in the next election, and he needs to be unequivocal once the campaign starts. But he’s the sort of communicator who can probably excel at highlighting the nonsense that underlies so many of those questions when the time comes.

When it comes to electability, Buttigieg is a military vet with a family, and compared to Trump, his character must be effectively unimpeachable. The only thing that Republicans might hold against him is his sexuality, so we just have to hope that by 2028, America is ready to elect an out gay man.
 
Running a white gay dude with no resume outside of that and his shitty tenure as Transport Secretary in the election after one dominated by troon rights, and the anti-LGBT backlash was so strong even corporate America got spooked and started backtracking, seems about at the Democrat party's usual amount of tone-deafness, both towards their base and the wider public, that I can 100% believe he somehow becomes the next candidate.
 
The Democrat establishment doesn't know who they're going to run yet, but it's definitely not this faggot. It's going to be Newscum or another white guy nobody likes, Bernie Sanders or controlled opposition, and then a few incredibly unlikeable ugly black and brown women.
 
Him being a gay guy is the least of his issues. He is yet another weak, milquetoast, stereotypical Democratic politician, ready to uphold the neoliberal world order.
 
He was the mayor of a medium-sized college town, then was one of the worst energy secretaries of all time for an administration run by a demented puppet. Lightweight doesn't even begin to describe his political resume.

While it won't be an issue in Blue States, running a gay dude is going to be extremely problematic amongst religious, male, elderly, and minority voters. You might not care for blue collar Purple states, but if you hadn't noticed the last few elections have been decided by them with relatively small margins. You are also going to galvanize conservative voters to vote against him, making the House an uphill battle. Imagine having a minority-driven strategy, then trying to convince Muslims in Michigan, steel workers in Pennsylvanian, the elderly in Arizona or Florida, blacks in Georgia, or Hispanics in Texas to vote for him.

Running this absolute fucking clown instead of a Democratic governor from a blue collar state would be one of the biggest strategic blunders imaginable. He does nothing to boost engagement amongst your base, and exacerbates massive weaknesses shown in your strategy the last three elections. His home state doesn't even give you any soft of advantage, for crying out loud. This is such an incredibly stupid idea that I could see the Democratic primary voters going for it.
Was he not Secretary of Transport when all those freight trains full of dangerous chemicals started derailing under sleepy Joe or was that another homosexual?
 
Running a white gay dude with no resume outside of that and his shitty tenure as Transport Secretary in the election after one dominated by troon rights, and the anti-LGBT backlash was so strong even corporate America got spooked and started backtracking, seems about at the Democrat party's usual amount of tone-deafness, both towards their base and the wider public, that I can 100% believe he somehow becomes the next candidate.
I don't see him becoming THE candidate (that's Newsome's spot to lose) but he definitely will be the Veep on such a ticket. Same pandering to the oppressed that they got out of Kamala, with none of the baggage from her being unable to be coherent for five minutes straight.
 
Faefyx Collington (They/Them)
I've seen this thing before...
Oh cool, a molestering version of Weird Al
1778279934330.png 1778279937668.png

You might not care for blue collar Purple states, but if you hadn't noticed the last few elections have been decided by them with relatively small margins
One argument for having South Carolina's primary so early is that it's a testbed for black support, without being a big costly state. Supposedly Jim Clyburn nixed Molesterer Pete and his <1% black support, and now he's been redistricted out.

So without this valuable feedback loop, Progs want to run Mr. GloboHomo incarnate. Lol.
 
I don't see him becoming THE candidate (that's Newsome's spot to lose) but he definitely will be the Veep on such a ticket. Same pandering to the oppressed that they got out of Kamala, with none of the baggage from her being unable to be coherent for five minutes straight.

I think the pandering VP slot will go to a Muslim. Dems don't care about blacks or gays at moment. They definitely won't put two white guys on a ticket together.
 
Hes never going to win obviously.

Gavin Newsom is their best bet but he trash.(go watch his debate with Desantis)

The Democratic strategy is a mix of globohomo communism and calling trump a fascist who going to kill us all while openly wishing to kill him.

Its embarrassing
 
He's not electable but he is one of the strongest candidates they have. Nobody else could stand up to either Vance or Rubio in debate, they will come off as hysterical faggots, while the actual faggot will just be bland and corporate.
Harris is unironically the strongest candidate they have, especially in a situation now where blacks are even more demoralized than they typically are + they will never vote for a faggot
 
Oh, I want them to run him to see how they would mental gymnastics why racial minorities all decided to vote red or not at all that election. That would be fun having to read their thinly veiled racism.
 
I'm not reading that stupid ass textwall in the OP. Buttigieg will not be president because if (and this is a big fucking if, btw) he somehow wins the Democratic primary, in the general election, JD Vance, (Buttigieg's likely opponent right now in this scenario) will at some point call Buttigieg "buttgig" and laugh at him. This will doom Buttigieg's presidential campaign.


Vance may make a joke about Buttigieg being good at "running trains" too, which will only make things worse for the Dem candidate, obviously.
 
I'm sure the people of East Palisade would love to vote for the man who doused their entire county with highly toxic chemicals. Or the 50 other fucking train derailments.
 
The Democrat establishment doesn't know who they're going to run yet, but it's definitely not this faggot. It's going to be Newscum or another white guy nobody likes, Bernie Sanders or controlled opposition, and then a few incredibly unlikeable ugly black and brown women.
Newsom will be the selectee, and AOC will play the Bernie role, because black men will not vote for a white faggot in the primaries and everything hinges on winning Super Tuesday. It will be, what, over 40 years at that point running the same playbook they've been doing since 1988, when Dukakis became the establishment's choice and Jesse Jackson was the radical alternative to try and get the base fired up?

Hilarious how these people call themselves the "party of change," because they can barely deviate from the political kabuki show they've had in place for decades.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo