People aren't (that) stupid - Also: A heuristic tool for gauging a stranger's intelligence

  • 🔧 Site instability resolved. You can report double-posts and broken attachments. For bigger issues, use the Technical Grievances thread.
    🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Penis Drager 2.0

My memes are ironic; My depression is chronic.
kiwifarms.net
Registrado
20 de Dic, 2022
[Preface: I made a thread the other day which got very little interest. Only thing worth note that came of it is a short debate that the other guy evidently got bored of. That discussion is the inspiration for this thread and I'm only a little ashamed to admit it.]

You have undoubtedly heard, and echoed, something along these lines: "Most people are stupid. They just repeat mantras without engaging in any real thought."
I've done it too. Just about every comedian has a bit predicated on the idea. Despite its "rude" subject matter, it's a safe mantra to repeat in pretty much any setting and you'll rarely find a room where you're in the minority for believing it.
But you're not stupid. You, like most other people, recognize that this is precisely one of those mantras that many people repeat without giving any real thought. Well let's give it some thought here.

Obviously, "dumb" is relative. When you call someone stupid, you're saying they're significantly less intelligent than yourself. Most people self-report their intelligence level at about 7/10 regardless of how intelligent they actually are, with 5/10 being average. So, assuming most people are dumb, let's tentatively say "dumb" is about 2/10 points below yourself. That's not hugely informative, but it gives us something to work with. It also leads nicely into the point I'm making with the subtitle:

The dumber you are, the dumber you think everyone else is.
If we follow the baseline I proposed above, we can use people's assumptions about other people to get a rough idea of how intelligent they actually are. Whenever someone says "people so stupid they can't even do [x]," it is an indicator that [x] is at the outer edge of what they consider "trivial."
To be more concrete: think about the kind of guy who says something like "I looked at the issue from both sides." In my experience, these have been some of the dumbest people attempting to engage in discourse I have ever met. They think the capacity to understand a position you don't agree with is beyond most people because it's barely within their own capacity. And that stupidity shows ever more clearly the longer you try to listen to them.
There is a direct relationship between how intelligent someone is and what they expect other people to be able to understand.

Notes:
  • Obviously, caveats abound. Intelligent people with exceptionally uncharitable views about people exist. So do idiots who are exceptionally charitable. If you harp about obvious exceptions without forwarding the discussion or addressing the core point in any meaningful way you are outing yourself as a moron.
  • Likewise, if you come in here trying to farm stickers by spouting shit about niggers or some other group the community at large doesn't like, I will mock you. You're engaging in exactly the sort of mantra repetition you purport to take issue with and what you're doing is transparent as fuck.
  • People do generally seem dumber than they actually are. You are likely no exception. I expand on this in some detail in the "Illusory Polarization" thread but the long-and-short is basically that the problem is usually communication and not comprehension.
 
Likewise, if you come in here trying to farm stickers by spouting shit about niggers or some other group the community at large doesn't like, I will mock you. You're engaging in exactly the sort of mantra repetition you purport to take issue with and what you're doing is transparent as fuck.
That's cool, but does anybody else think niggers are fucking retarded? Because I think niggers are fucking retarded.
 
I unironically believe I am the dumbest black gorilla nigger on the planet and nothing anyone says will ever convince me otherwise.
 
We're all stupid. That's the conclusion I've come to.
Even people with incredible intellects and memory and insatiable curiosity run into the limits of the brevity of the human lifespan versus the totality of knowledge out there.
Even if we endeavor to learn as much as possible about as many things as possible, we are still dwarfed by the immensity of what there is to know.
Wisdom comes from knowing where your limits are and acknowledging them.
As Wittgenstein said:
“Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.”
 
The issue is "dumb" and "smart" are relative.
Humans in general are at once very smart and very stupid depending on how you look at it: unlike lesser creatures humans can engage in reason, but by the same token what is reason even? Is it actually that great or is it an illusion we only think is incredible because we're dumb and very impressed by ourselves? We're still apes ruled by our physiology and instincts at the end of the day. If we were that smart we'd be able to transcend our mortality.

As for repeating mantras without giving thought, people's tendency to engage in groupthink is an entirely different dimension to the issue vs. their independent intelligence. And in some cases people repeat mantras because their psychological priorities are just different, there are surely loads of genderspecials who believe they're the real thinkers because everyone else just accepts the gender binary while they're a grey asexual pangender system.
Going along with the crowd isn't always a bad thing, and a compulsive need to decide for yourself can be very alienating and thus disadvantageous.

We live in current day, there are tons of very "smart" people who aren't successfully propogating their genes. Does intelligence count if it's unable to be applied for competitive advantage? Even if someone isn't "smart" that isn't always necessarily a negative trait, because intelligence often comes paired with neuroses. In nature there's no such thing as better or worse, only features most fit for an organism's niche.

So I guess my point is that smart and dumb is mostly made up, and even in the capacity that they do exist are only traits without any inherent positive or negative value. Mostly people have different psychological wavelengths, and that's it.
 
We live in current day, there are tons of very "smart" people who aren't successfully propogating their genes. Does intelligence count if it's unable to be applied for competitive advantage?
"Can you actually be tall if you don't successfully segue it into an NBA career?"

Yes, and you're a fucking retard for conflating two clearly different things.
 
I guess my point is that smart and dumb is mostly made up
For the purposes of this discussion I think it's safe to use a fairly "standard" definition of intelligence:
The capacity to engage in nested-order thinking, operate with abstract conditionals, and evaluate multiple independent variables.
Whether you have the drive or discipline to take advantage of that is another matter.
 
I meet a lot of people that are pretty fucking dumb. I wouldn't say most people are stupid though. A lot of people are ignorant, but ignorance and stupidity aren't the same thing.
Whenever someone says "people so stupid they can't even do [x]," it is an indicator that [x] is at the outer edge of what they consider "trivial."
That's an example of ignorance right there. Someone making that claim is ignorant about the other person's general abilities and ignorant about the abilities of other people in general.

A lot of things people say that come across as stupid is really just people speaking too confidently from a place of ignorance. I have met some legitimately stupid people. Even then though more often it's just people who choose to remain largely ignorant about most things, not because they're actually stupid.
 
Someone making that claim is ignorant about the other person's general abilities and ignorant about the abilities of other people in general.
I agree in principle, but there are some people I've known over a relative long period of time and found out they don't know this and they don't know that and they don't know ten million other things.

So what DO they know, exactly? At some point, surely you can start drawing conclusions about a person's intelligence based on the fact they've been alive for multiple decades and have absorbed so little information about the world around them, even if every individual piece could be dismissed as trivial. Everyone has gaps in their knowledge, but some people are just one big chasm.
 
"I'm surrounded by idiots" is a mantra for nerds who want to feel superior in comparison to their peers.

This was in later years adopted by political edgelords who like to behave as if they aren't as much niggercattle as everyone else

And can't forget barely literate racists who talk on how niggers are dumb while holding the same Yakub tier beliefs.

It's all just a standard superiority complex, but instead of something objective, the nerds use intelligence as a means to feel better.
 
D1-z69PX0AIVRL5-2073454720.jpg
 
Having had to volunteer at the local high school's special ed program for a week for one of my college courses I can tell you these profoundly retarded kids who are mobile are incredibly clever when it comes to eloping.
Are they, or does the school just not care? What is the point spending time and resources in tracking down SPEDs?
 
Are they, or does the school just not care? What is the point spending time and resources in tracking down SPEDs?
Care or "care", the school has a lot of reasons to be very proactive about preventing tards from harming themselves or others. The moral and societal impact of tard wrangling isn't of interest to me at the moment, all I was trying to say is that even very low IQ humans can be clever and manipulative. Within their means to do so, that is.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo