People are good, right?

[player#21498112]

or evil? idl

 

[Character from a movie]

I would say there are three types of people: good, evil and neutral. Good people do more good than harm, evil people do more harm than good and neutral people do none or do equal amounts of good and harm. I think most people are neutral.

 

[CrazyRandomZyn]

People are good but will happily choose to do evil/selfish actions.
Edit: To elaborate, we've had lots of Mythological tales about humans/Gods/Titans/Hybrids choosing to do bad actions: Lillith, Prometheus, Eve, Gilgamesh, Izanagi and Izanami for millenia.

 

[Orange Rhymer]

Define these terms please.

 

[Red Hood]

People are good but will happily choose to do evil/selfish actions.

especially if they can mentally rationalize or justify it with "it's evil but..."

 

[Penis Drager]

Very few people do evil things with the intent of being evil. Most would much rather see their friends happy than their enemies suffer, for example.
A lot of our perception of human character comes down to actor/observer bias:
-your actions are a result of circumstance.
-others' actions are a result of their character.

"I didn't do the bad thing because I'm a bad person, I just had no better alternative."
"He would have done literally anything other than what he did if he weren't a bad person."
Etc.

 

[Gekks]

See, there are three kinds of people: dicks, pussies and assholes.

Pussies think everyone can get along and dicks just want to fuck all the time without thinking it through.

But then you got your assholes. And all the assholes want is to shit all over everything.

So pussies may get mad at dicks once in a while because, pussies get fucked by dicks. But dicks also fuck assholes.

And if they didn't fuck the assholes, you know what you'd get?

You'd get your dick and your pussy all covered in shit.

 

[Some JERK]

People are capable of either. and you never know who is who. If you assume that everyone is good you're in trouble. If you assume that everyone is evil, you're on your own. Neither is a safe place to stand.

 

[libRT]

Actions are either good or bad. People are the sum of their actions so people are good and bad (but not or). Morality is too difficult to quantify so everyone is a bit of both, except for the extremes you can't really tell if someone does more good than evil or vice versa (even then, if you are to believe what western culture peddles, that humanity is evil by default, that would make hitler, stalin and mao the best people of all time).

I think the answer you want is given an infinite timeline, good will ultimately win. Not because people are special or God orders it, but simply that being good is a more efficient strategy than evil.

and this is all ignoring the difficulty in defining what is good and what is evil.

 

[Uncle Sid]

I would say there are three types of people: good, evil and neutral.

Thanks for that Earth-shattering insight there Mr. Gygax.

 

[Orange Rhymer]

I'm still waiting for definitions.

 

[TroonsDid911]

People are retarded. That is the only thing we can know for certain.

 

[player#21498112]

i just posted this when i was angry its a stupid question lol but thanks for the cool answers

 

[player#21498112]

btw all your answer are fucking retarded lol

 

[mario if smoke weed]

People are not good-right, they're alt-right

 

[stares at error messages]

Yes, people are good. Did you hear, France is so scraped for cash due to covid their selling the Eiffel tower for the metal. If you want to buy it, let me know and I'll give you my Nigerian bank account info so you can wire me the money.

 

[player#21498112]

I would say there are three types of people: good, evil and neutral. Good people do more good than harm, evil people do more harm than good and neutral people do none or do equal amounts of good and harm. I think most people are neutral.

 

[player#21498112]

you guys want my answer? people are obviously much more evil than good. because the world is human nature, and its going to be dead very soon, the world is fucking disgusting. you don't agree? then you're the problem.