People are believing the psy-op again. - There was "another" "assassination attempt" on Trump.

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

paroom paroom

formerly
kiwifarms.net
Registrado
13 de Ago, 2024
Keep voting, keep voting, whether "left" or "right". Keep giving your explicit consent to be ruled over by despots with no accountability for their actions, keep acquiescing to be stolen from under the state's threat of violence, keep agreeing to maintain a system that works hard to keep all humans in the plantation.

This time it'll work. Unlike all the other times. Just don't ask questions and VOTE. We need your vote, because just like with vampires, we need your permission to enter the house. Thanks for inviting us in. Don't worry, vote Kamala or vote Trump, it doesn't matter to us.


bm.jpg

Trump's Beautiful Majestic Angelic Ear
 
Look I think the two-party system is retarded, voting is meaningless, and ideology may or may not exist merely as a means of both controlling the people and allowing us to justify our own barbarism, but you're on some schizo shit right now chile.


Oh wait it's Aether Witch, that makes sense. Nice to see you again friendo.
 
For your education and edification on Paroom Paroom (formerly Aether Witch, possible glowie) I refer you to this thread: https://kiwifarms.st/threads/are-viruses-real.179343/ wherein I got into a long and retarded argument over some quackery and eventually abandoned it due to being a lazy cunt and growing bored.

And just for funsies, compare and contrast OP's style of posting with this handy-dandy guide: https://archive.ph/C9o2p
 
For your education and edification on Paroom Paroom (formerly Aether Witch, possible glowie) I refer you to this thread: https://kiwifarms.st/threads/are-viruses-real.179343/
Thanks for providing this thread for everyone to see.
wherein I got into a long and retarded argument over some quackery and eventually abandoned it due to being a lazy cunt and growing bored.
Wherein you got into a long and retarded argument over things that are way over your head, and you exposed yourself as the thermonuclear level glowie that you are.

@Agamemnon Busmalis
Yeah, just giving up will show them.
Only it's not giving up, it's just not giving them power over you in a system that has proved to be rigged over and over again.
 
Wherein you got into a long and retarded argument over things that are way over your head, and you exposed yourself as the thermonuclear level glowie that you are.
"18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how 'sensitive they are to criticism.'"
 
Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how 'sensitive they are to criticism.'"
Literally what you're doing in this thread. Instead of discussing, or giving any constructive criticism, you call me a schizo
but you're on some schizo shit right now chile.
and bring up completely unrelated topics, trying to come for me again:
wherein I got into a long and retarded argument over some quackery



 
Literally what you're doing in this thread. Instead of discussing, or giving any constructive criticism, you call me a schizo

and bring up completely unrelated topics, trying to come for me again:




Stan Twitter __ Azealia Banks “so....what now”.mp4
"7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could be taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive."
 
This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive."
When have you tried to "discuss issues"? What do you want to discuss? Come on, bring any sort of argument.

@Agamemnon Busmalis
That'll turn out about as well as not filing a tax return.
If most people don't vote, what legitimacy has the state? None. Do you think voting for a crook will fix anything? Even if you don't vote for one of the two uniparty candidates, you're voting in a game that you know is rigged, you're accepting to play a game that you know you have no way to win, and you accept the terms and conditions of the game.
 
When have you tried to "discuss issues"? What do you want to discuss? Come on, bring any sort of argument.
In this case the issue is that you're gay and retarded and you may or may not be a glow in the dark CIA nigger of some kind.
And hey, first one I can't fit a rule to. Either you're improving or the sleep deprivation is getting to me.
 
In this case the issue is that you're gay and retarded and you may or may not be a glow in the dark CIA nigger of some kind.
And hey, first one I can't fit a rule to. Either you're improving or the sleep deprivation is getting to me.
No arguments again, cool. Thanks for proving you were merely projecting your glowie handbook onto me this whole time :3

@mindlessobserver
I'm not voting for Trump because I think he will do anything. I am voting for him because it's funny.
That's a really dumb reason to vote for anyone, not gonna lie.
 
No arguments again, cool. Thanks for proving you were merely projecting your glowie handbook onto me this whole time :3
"4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues."
 
"4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues."
My goodness, you're so fucking dumb. Last of my replies to you on this thread.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo