Culture Paramount: we won’t remove content from eras with ‘different sensibilities’ - Boss of media company says it would be a mistake to censor art because it may offend some people today


1656267779581.png

The boss of the US media company Paramount has said he does not want to remove historic programmes from his new subscription streaming service because they no longer meet current expectations.

Bob Bakish, Paramount’s CEO, said his company had thousands of shows in its back catalogue. “By definition, you have some things that were made in a different time and reflect different sensibilities,” he said. “I don’t believe in censoring art that was made historically, that’s probably a mistake. It’s all on demand – you don’t have to watch anything you don’t want to.”

Streaming companies have struggled with how to adapt to modern cultural expectations when it comes to archive shows, with BritBox and the BBC’s iPlayer among those removing content that is no longer deemed appropriate for modern tastes.

Bakish also said the company would not comment on speculation linking it to a potential purchase of a privatised Channel 4, saying: “We’re good with where we are in the UK.”

Paramount, formerly known as ViacomCBS, owns the US television networks CBS, MTV and Nickelodeon, along with Paramount Pictures, which recently had a global hit with the film Top Gun: Maverick.

In the UK it is the parent company of Channel 5, which has enjoyed a revival under its ownership. Nevertheless, it is a late entrant to the British streaming market, which is already dominated by Netflix along with new arrivals such as Apple TV+ and Disney+.

As a result, Paramount+ is being pitched as an additional streaming service costing £6.99 that offers access to Paramount’s film back catalogue along with shows such as Star Trek, South Park and SpongeBob SquarePants.

The company has agreed a deal with Sky that will mean millions of Sky Cinema customers will receive Paramount+ for free. Although this gives Paramount instant access to millions of customers, it also means it will earn less money per customer.

Bakish said: “We don’t view streamers as a winner-takes-all market. We want to be one of a number of services in the household.”
 
Even if they don't remove it outright, I'm guessing they'll still preface them with one of those unskippable "This movie contains stereotypes that were wrong at the time, and are wrong today" messages that Disney+ stick in front of pretty much all their early animated movies.
This absolutely boils my blood, and Disney has been doing this fuckery for a while now.

I remember back in the 2000's, Disney finally released all of their controversial wartime animations on a special box set, which was cool as hell...but before the more "spicy" cartoons started, they started with an unskippable fucking video intro with Leonard Malten warning the audience that these cartoons were a product of their times and that some of the content may be in bad taste. Then the faggot goes and spoils the ending by showing clips of the conclusions and discussing them -- keep in mind these spoilers were BEFORE the cartoons played. These were DVD's, too, and had that fucking no-skip feature when you try to skip over it; It's one of the things I miss about VHS.
 
Pretty based... I'm cautiously optimistic. Maybe I can have a streaming service again.
 
Honestly a pretty smart decision.
Plenty of boomers will pay for reruns of their fav show, jut to eat the memberberries.
And with modern algorithms you can easily make it so that some woketard never ever sees the old stuff without explicitly searching for it.
And I doubt 99% of the offended would seek out older content anyway. They have scorched attention spans and browse with one hand down their pants. The farther back you go, the less either of those things is coddled.
 
Nobody should have to watch new Trek, not the Chinese, not the Durka Durkas, nobody should endure that!
 
Atrás
Top Abajo