Oppressormaxxing - Advice for maximizing for international shitskin suffering.

[Ed Special]

Hey there, fellow kiwis, I was wondering how I could maximize the amount of third-worlder suffering, child slavery, and general shittiness in undeveloped countries that my life causes, without sacrificing my personal health, personally violating any laws, or paying into industries that import third-worlders into the US to use slave labor here. I know dark chocolate and coconut are heavily dependent on underage child labor, and many tropical fruits are imported by companies that horrifically exploit LatAm shitskins and send literal death squads at anyone trying to unionize their borderline slaves, and of course we all know that even "premium" clothing and electronics are made by "people" who don't have much of a choice in the matter, but what other options am I missing?

 

[break these cuffs]

I would tell you to start jerking off to cartoon and tranny porn, because that's what everyone says will save the VVest and destroy shitskins, but I'm gonna guess you already have that covered based on your avatar.

 

[umseriously]

Literally taking away their women and breeding them. It's something that has already happened to you so I suppose it would be fair game to do the same back. But that requires effort even if the most tiniest amount possible.

 

[The Lurky 1]

Start by not eating your veggies and throwing them in the garbage cause FUCK those kids in Africa!

 

[Ed Special]

I would tell you to start jerking off to cartoon and tranny porn, because that's what everyone says will save the VVest and destroy shitskins, but I'm gonna guess you already have that covered based on your avatar.

I don't care about "saving the VVest", I just want more nigger children to die in the fields for my dark chocolate and the like.

Literally taking away their women and breeding them. It's something that has already happened to you so I suppose it would be fair game to do the same back. But that requires effort even if the most tiniest amount possible.

More importantly, it requires bringing them here, which I don't want. I want them to die in their own "countries" for my hedonistic degenerate lifestyle.

 

[XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG]

As a self-imposed challenge, I'm trying to think of answers that are ethically defensible.
The ones I came up with so far:

• Abstain from donating
• Decline to fund development/aid
• Decline to invest capital, expertise, or markets
• Buy only goods that preserve extracative low-value local economies (like, low added value, depending on cheap manual labor, like raw cocoa, palm oil, cobalt, coffee, cotton etc)
• Abstain from criticizing or sanctioning known private coercion, provided that your silence is not part of a scheme that materially facilitates force
• Make contracts with poor people using your superior bargaining and information asymmetries, provided that you are not employing coercive deception
• Encourage consumption patterns and consumer habits that undercut higher-value production in those regions, provided you are not actively supporting violent enforcement of market positions
• Deliberately avoid reforms or voluntary norms that reduce abuse (such as industry transparency, audit schemes, certification, standards etc.), provided that you don't actively fund enforcement of abuse

 

[Ed Special]

Abstain from donating

This can actually help turd-world shitholes. The "mosquito nets" that were all the rage for white leftists in the early to mid 2000s, for example, ended up being used exclusively as fishing nets, which wiped out the aquatic ecosystems and caused greater long-term famine for niggers. For a more abstract example, though, donating shoes and clothes stifles local businesses that specialize in producing or selling these goods, which prevents economic development and forces more shitskins to mine blood minerals and grow cash crops. By strategically abusing donations, you can ironically create more abhuman suffering than you prevent. This actually applies doubly with donating clothes and shoes, in particular, because those are made in horrifyingly unsafe sweatshops by women and children in a different part of the world, meaning you can use Malaysians to oppress Africans and be praised as a good, just, moral person for it by white shitlibs.

 

[XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG]

This can actually help turd-world shitholes. The "mosquito nets" that were all the rage for white leftists in the early to mid 2000s, for example, ended up being used exclusively as fishing nets, which wiped out the aquatic ecosystems and caused greater long-term famine for niggers. For a more abstract example, though, donating shoes and clothes stifles local businesses that specialize in producing or selling these goods, which prevents economic development and forces more shitskins to mine blood minerals and grow cash crops. By strategically abusing donations, you can ironically create more abhuman suffering than you prevent.

I suppose you could use the logic of "when you feed wild animals, they become dependent on you" when it comes to strategic donating. The only issue is that donating money deprives you of money that you could use for different goals.

 

[Ed Special]

I suppose you could use the logic of "when you feed wild animals, they become dependent on you" when it comes to strategic donating.

There's a reason the German word for "Poison" is "Gift".

The only issue is that donating money deprives you of money that you could use for different goals.

If I throw a $100 bill out in a homeless camp, sure, I'm out $100, but I get to watch a bunch of junkies inflict thousands of dollars worth of hospital bills upon each other. The suffering created far outweighs the pleasure the shekels could have given me. The same's true of the mosquito net example - a $5 net causes untold ecological damage.

 

[XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG]

There's a reason the German word for "Poison" is "Gift".

If I throw a $100 bill out in a homeless camp, sure, I'm out $100, but I get to watch a bunch of junkies inflict thousands of dollars worth of hospital bills upon each other.

Not just in German, but also in Danish
It's an interesting etymological quandary, since the root of the word is in giving (engl. gift, ger. geben), so a giving of something became a giving of something deadly or harmful. You gotta ask the people around the 13th century. Consider the Greek-Latin word dosis (engl. dose) which also meant present or gift, but has become a euphemism for poison as well.

 

[umseriously]

More importantly, it requires bringing them here, which I don't want. I want them to die in their own "countries" for my hedonistic degenerate lifestyle.

Then sorry stalker child, but the third world continue to come in here then. This is the only way that will work I'm afraid. Anything good in life requires hard work BOI.

 

[wtfNeedSignUp]

Live a rich liberal life style, including a vegan diet. Your super food will not only use slave labour, but outright cause mass starvation due to pricing out the native population, your gadgets will be made in a work camp, your beauty products will cause massive amount of toxic chemicals to be vented into the rivers.

 

[Ed Special]

including a vegan diet

Counterpoint, beef production maximizes climate change, which will most harshly affect the poor, brown parts of the world, and Brapzillian cattle farmers are also massively accelerating the Amazon's deforestation through slash-and-burn agriculture faster because beef production requires more land per calorie of food production than even the least land-efficient vegetables. I like a lot of your other ideas there, though. Now, on the subject of consooming tech, which would you suggest I go with: Apple, or Samsung?

 

[wtfNeedSignUp]

Counterpoint, beef production maximizes climate change, which will most harshly affect the poor, brown parts of the world, and Brapzillian cattle farmers are also massively accelerating the Amazon's deforestation through slash-and-burn agriculture faster because beef production requires more land per calorie of food production than even the least land-efficient vegetables. I like a lot of your other ideas there, though. Now, on the subject of consooming tech, which would you suggest I go with: Apple, or Samsung?

Nah that's just "EAT ZE BUGS" bullshit. The idea cows create pollution despite being part of the natural life cycle, as if their farts are equal to burning oil. And vegetables are definitely not land efficient considering how you need a massive field to feed a population, while a great amount of people can be fed using a single cow.

As for tech, I'd go with Xiaomi.

 

[Smoltine Kiminal]

the answer is of course bill-gates-maxxing
found a nonprofit that you can use for tax evasion, vaxxinate the shit out of africa, sell access to african lab-niggers to pharma companies for human testing purposes and fund your operation that way
as a free bonus you give them aids, and pretend to be some kinda philanthropist

Make contracts with poor people using information asymmetries

>libertarians not rubbing hands over deceptive contracts challenge level: impossible

 

[XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG]

>libertarians not rubbing hands over deceptive contracts challenge level: impossible

>thinking every information asymmetry is deceptive
NGMI

 

[Smoltine Kiminal]

>thinking every information asymmetry is deceptive
NGMI

ok you can gimme those stupid boomer rocks, ill give you pictures of monkeys for it

 

[Male Idiot]

Does foreign medicine help or not?

If you give prep to aids infected brown once, he can soread his poz on the down low.

Condoms are a gamble. They mean more niglets, mkre mouths to feed, but they may also be ferried over to you by jude.

Plus condoms don't fit Indians. Tiny pecker has evolved to lifehack that jew trick to lower white birthrates.