Opinions on Machine Learning? - they come for out jerbs...

  • 🔧 Site instability resolved. You can report double-posts and broken attachments. For bigger issues, use the Technical Grievances thread.
    🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Cabelaz

Hang ‘Em High.
kiwifarms.net
Registrado
3 de Ene, 2020
I'm torn whether or not this is a good or bad thing for the welfare of humanity. I feel like it would be stupid to write it off- but I can't really see any positives besides automation and only see a slippery slope, but where that slope would lead I really can't tell. Guess I'm dumb
 
where that slope would lead I really can't tell.
We are definitely going to see deepfakes. It's already childishly easy to photoshop screenshots, and soon people will be creating fake recordings and videos. In today's highly politicized climate, I can definitely see politically motivated bad actors faking evidence to wrongfully convict people.

"What's that, Mr. Moon? You're innocent? Well, too bad, here's a recording of you telling our agent you wanted to kill the President. And due to the case volume, you won't see a judge anytime soon. Your stay here will be, as they say, indefinite."
 
It's a little overhyped, but it will probably become better, leading to that slope and a mess for a lot of people. May you live in exciting times.
 
In the realm of indie video games and video creation (and other art/voice needed creations) ML is a godsend to single man and small teams to create these things.
-The AI voices in this video for example.-

However, it can be used for malicious intent of course and will inevitably be stifled by governments/corporations. It can also be used by the media to aid all the propaganda they shill out.
 
I'd be very surprised if the majority of OnlyFans "content creators" didn't only have a few years left. Once you can have exactly what you want while paying a whole lot less I can't image it will continue to be a viable "career" option.
 
My goto argument against machine learning fearmongering is Climate Change/Global Warming - It's a lie which dominates our current economic and political systems built entirely on out of context images and "trust the experts", with this level of effect using simple editing, why should we be scared of any deep fake?

Ditto machine learning to answer questions will usually reach the same answers as a normal person will intuitively know without needing all the complex math formula: "Don't give this Nigger low parole because he is a nigger who will immediately make another offense".
 
Ditto machine learning to answer questions will usually reach the same answers as a normal person will intuitively know without needing all the complex math formula: "Don't give this Nigger low parole because he is a nigger who will immediately make another offense".
Amazon already found this years ago, but not with niggers, or maybe them too:
2023-10-24_10-23.png
 
I love the ai music world. Joshcore is my new favorite thing. As far as societal downfall goes. It's going to happen one way or another.
Wait I have looked for each type of AI service and my opinion was that all the AI music sucked (or were more resembling each other than pop songs do). There's a generator that actually makes good stuff?
 
Wait I have looked for each type of AI service and my opinion was that all the AI music sucked (or were more resembling each other than pop songs do). There's a generator that actually makes good stuff?
Stable Audio is probably the best music generator so far. "Joshcore" is different. It uses existing music, someone's voice, and overwrites the vocals in the existing music. Results vary.
 
I'm torn whether or not this is a good or bad thing for the welfare of humanity. I feel like it would be stupid to write it off- but I can't really see any positives besides automation and only see a slippery slope, but where that slope would lead I really can't tell. Guess I'm dumb
It's a good thing, but retards mostly don't understand it. (AI!!!!!11!!) Machine learning spots patterns by looking at data sets too large for a human to handle. It requires a human to tell it what to consider or include, and is not a magic bullet. It can do incredible things like spot cancer in blood tests in patients far earlier than humans are typically able to.


"What's that, Mr. Moon? You're innocent? Well, too bad, here's a recording of you telling our agent you wanted to kill the President. And due to the case volume, you won't see a judge anytime soon. Your stay here will be, as they say, indefinite."
This is intended to serve the opposite purpose actually. "Your honor, I know my client was caught in 8k gunning down those children, but it was clearly a deepfake! video evidence can't be trusted in court!"
 
The fundamental problem is they're eventually going to run out of human-generated content to train it on and when that happens the whole thing will unravel in a sudden and spectacular way.
 
It's true for every obvious social trend, and usually why the developers end up fucking with AI to the point it's barely functioning.
The fundamental problem is they're eventually going to run out of human-generated content to train it on and when that happens the whole thing will unravel in a sudden and spectacular way.
Not really, texts and images are virtually endless online and generating new data is pretty easy.
 
Extremely high potential for multiple industries but strongly limited by adversarial ML. There's a lot of push for creating impressive tools but only a few even care about preventing data poisoning by competition and malicious actors. Average person won't notice shit though and it will continue to be computer magic to them. It's a blackbox even for most industry people.
 
Only for pre-2023 content.
You could probably identified AI text pretty easily (usually corporate sounding or repetitive) and AI images extremely easily (a lot of small things, primarily too smooth surfaces). But honestly pre 2023 data is large enough for basically any use you can dream of.
 
It’s a tool, and like any tech tool it depends what it’s used for. We use it in clinical science type settings to spot patterns and it is arguably as good as the average human diagnostician.
Liability issue will keep us using humans for a while.
It has potential but that potential is specific.
 
Once the entertainment industry fully takes advantage of AI generation we'll have a homogenized landscape of mediocrity the likes of which we've never seen. I predict even the woke era of Disney CGI films will not seem so bad compared to the soulless AI created prolefeed we'll get in a decade or less.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo