OnlyFans stops allowing sexually explicit content

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Destacado
OnlyFans is getting out of the pornography business.

The company will prohibit users from posting any sexually explicit conduct, starting in October. Creators will still be allowed to post nude photos and videos, provided they're consistent with OnlyFans' policy, the company said Thursday.

The changes are needed because of mounting pressure from banking partners and payment providers, according to the company.
 
Presiona para expandir...
 
I don't really care one way or another if OF bans porn stuff since I don't use it (it encourages parasocial relationships, which are cancer with or without porn) but my thought is this: what comes to the average person's mind when you say "I have an OnlyFans page?"

My guess is probably "oh, they do porn." How is OF going to "mend" or "course correct" that reputation?

Basically, I think they're shooting themselves in the foot to a degree. It'll be interesting to see if they fizzle out to a shell of their former selves, like tumblr did.
 
Badungus Kabungus dijo:
What they done would make sense if there was some kind of upcoming regulation or some other outside factor that would kill the site in its current form. Instead they've chosen to lose a lot of content creators but preserve the OnlyFans name which has fairly decent brand name recognition with normies, so they could possibly pivot to something new.
Presiona para expandir...
Any time only fans is brought up in normie conversation it's to talk about skanks. The brand name is tied to porn, I'm not so sure all publicity is good publicity in this case.
 
Terrifik dijo:
Salt mine is rich
Ver archivo adjunto 2460220
Presiona para expandir...
Lmao "Meowdelyn"

Dude probably uses one of the 50 different websites that rehost OF shit. Even if he did pay for that shit, what would proving he did do to help your argument? Its called Onlyfans, not Onlypornsiteontheinternet; he'll find some other coom material.

Stop trying to make yourself seem important, you flash pussy for pennies.
 
A number of sites ban porn. Patreon does. Porn causes problems. No payment processor wants to run the risk of illegal stuff. I know that onlyfans and chaturbate go to great lengths to keep the kids out of the picture, but a single nine year old who slips through the cracks could bring everything down for them.

I never understood this site anyway. Why would I pay some guy $15 to see two faceless masturbation vids when I can find thousands of vids of twinks being debased for free? It makes even less sense with women. Front holes are so boring. Who is paying to see that? Closeted fagets trying to "stay straight"?
 
1629408991315.png
 
Kujo Jotaro dijo:
Any time only fans is brought up in normie conversation it's to talk about skanks. The brand name is tied to porn, I'm not so sure all publicity is good publicity in this case.
Presiona para expandir...
I was talking more in the context of the right target market, like normie being the occasional pornography consumer who heard about it from a more experienced coomer. As in, people who pay for pornography. As for decent church-going folk who don't pay for pornography, consider yourself lucky to be in that company. But they don't present a commercial interest in this context.
 
idosometimes dijo:
A number of sites ban porn. Patreon does. Porn causes problems. No payment processor wants to run the risk of illegal stuff. I know that onlyfans and chaturbate go to great lengths to keep the kids out of the picture, but a single nine year old who slips through the cracks could bring everything down for them.

I never understood this site anyway. Why would I pay some guy $15 to see two faceless masturbation vids when I can find thousands of vids of twinks being debased for free? It makes even less sense with women. Front holes are so boring. Who is paying to see that? Closeted fagets trying to "stay straight"?
Presiona para expandir...
Simps are a strange, sad breed. Sometimes they'll pay camwhores to put close back on.
 
Shit, where's that copypasta Null made about hating whores and hoping they burn in hell.
 
idosometimes dijo:
A number of sites ban porn. Patreon does. Porn causes problems. No payment processor wants to run the risk of illegal stuff. I know that onlyfans and chaturbate go to great lengths to keep the kids out of the picture, but a single nine year old who slips through the cracks could bring everything down for them.

I never understood this site anyway. Why would I pay some guy $15 to see two faceless masturbation vids when I can find thousands of vids of twinks being debased for free? It makes even less sense with women. Front holes are so boring. Who is paying to see that? Closeted fagets trying to "stay straight"?
Presiona para expandir...
the issue is what NULL explaned the banks can kick you without word if they know its porn.
there was a Fair Access to Financial Services (OCC-2020-0042-0001) which would of made banks more liable for taking down people income but scrubed because MY GUN CONTROL & Choke point intive.
The seconday boss is take Child Prottection group to supreme court throw out their long arm child protection bill-FOSTA-SESTA .

1629409543711.png
 
We might actually see a few of the bigger players have financial issues. More than a few big names recently bought luxury homes and other end high stuff they just won't be able to afford or maintain with the gravy train gone.

On one hand, thots got patrolled hard. On the other, it's yet another example of a handful of payment processors having way too much power.
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo