OnlyFans is depressing

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Mom, dad don't fight. Look, prostitution isn't the oldest profession, but it is the second-oldest. As soon as there is spare income, some of it will be spent on it, because, guess what sometimes it is the preferable option to a relationship. It's cheaper, safer and offers more choice. The boys used to chip in and take their shy friend to fuck a prostitute, so he can get sex off his mind. There are more important things in life than pussy, but some of us can forget that.
 
Mom, dad don't fight. Look, prostitution isn't the oldest profession, but it is the second-oldest. As soon as there is spare income, some of it will be spent on it, because, guess what sometimes it is the preferable option to a relationship. It's cheaper, safer and offers more choice. The boys used to chip in and take their shy friend to fuck a prostitute, so he can get sex off his mind. There are more important things in life than pussy, but some of us can forget that.
It's not even the prostitution part that's the grossest thing, though that's definitely gross. It's the transactional girlfriend experience they try to sell. That is massively depressing.

Go back to Reddit dude. Your OF girlfriend isn't going to give you discounts for white knighting her on kiwi farms.
It's pretty telling that he doesn't understand intimacy with another person at all, lol.
 
It's not even the prostitution part that's the grossest thing, though that's definitely gross. It's the transactional girlfriend experience they try to sell. That is massively depressing.
Prostitutes used to call that their "regulars." Nothing's new under the sun, son.
 
No, that's what OnlyFans is explicitly promoting. You're not supposed to let yourself catch feelings for a ho. That is a rookie mistake. "We don't love them hoes" should be long-since burned into your brain like a mantra.
I do agree with you in the sense, why pay for something that's available for free and also, why not spend the same money if not less on a flesh-and-blood woman? Kinks? These women will do anything if you pay up. That I don't get.

Edit: unless having a para-social relationship online is the kink. In which case they are getting exactly what they are paying for.
 
How do you all feel about the e-hos who charge their simps money to see their dickpics for ratings? That's a hustle which baffles the fuck out of me, but their ability to monetize that tempers my disgust and bewilderment.
I don't mind if women get that bag from simps. It's one of the the oldest hustles for a reason.
 
In addition to what's been said before, it's depressing how many famous people are shilling it too. I get that this is a joke, but why are celebrities like John Sina shilling a porn site? Are they really that money-minded they will associate their brand with a site known for women debasing themselves for mere dollars? It just seems like the company that owns Onlyfans is trying to get new johns from groups of men that are typically unsuccessful with women on the site to trick them into the parasocial rent-a-girlfirend experience:

At least when Quentin from The Book Club did something like this, he was clothed and he's an actually mentally ill man who tried to make a pilgramage to Egypt from the UK that uses 4chan's /lit/ a bit too much, so it's not a bit of a stretch to say he's shitposting a bit too hard when he did that:

(It says it's age restricrticted so here's the raw video: )

All in all, everyone that uses Onlyfans is a victim, from the producers to the users.

Edit: Fuck me. The Robert Fripp video was an April Fool's joke. A ghastly one, but one nonetheless. I removed it because it is not relevant and to save the sanity of my fellow man.
 
Última edición:
I do agree with you in the sense, why pay for something that's available for free and also, why not spend the same money if not less on a flesh-and-blood woman? Kinks? These women will do anything if you pay up. That I don't get.

Edit: unless having a para-social relationship online is the kink. In which case they are getting exactly what they are paying for.
I'm just going to repeat myself.
The nude photos are just one feature for the simp. Entering into parasocial relationships are a bigger deal. Simps tend to be socially awkward, mentally damaged, directionless men seeking anything resembling a girlfriend experience, so interacting with whores on OnlyFans may be the closest they'll come to being with a woman who will fulfill their sexual needs. Bear in mind many of these whores will literally charge their simps money to see their dickpicks for ratings. It's one thing to pay for a whore's nudes, but to ask one of these street urchins her earnest opinion about your penis is quite another.

In other cases, some simps pay whores on OnlyFans so other simps don't have to. They're pirates taking one for the team.
To me, blessed are those who take one for the team and leak their findings for the rest of us. It was their monetary sacrifice that made accessing the e-hos' respective nudes possible.
 
I thought some of the more popular camwhores outright had teams to pose as themselves and exchange dirty texts with their simps?
Yes, way more than 'some popular', I'd say it's the usual thing now. Put something like "Onlyfans management agencies" into Google and you'll find dozens if not hundreds of companies founded to manage accounts. Unless it's some small cracked up russian chick with 12 followers, it's safe to assume you're talking to a dude or an AI when you spend dollars to message some egirl. The bigger ones probably don't do anything but supply the agency with some pics and short vids once a month, and leave the entire stuff to them.

And no this isn't a big secret. To be fair, it's not different from streamers or other 'content creators'. Internet grifters don't rely on a million people giving a dollar, they rely on finding the whales, the mentally ill losers they can milk of their money and time. And unlike some tranny killed by New Zealand Agriculturalists gossiping, nobody will give a fuck when a 28 year old dude with no real friends kills himself, so nobody ever gets in trouble.
 
Yes, way more than 'some popular', I'd say it's the usual thing now. Put something like "Onlyfans management agencies" into Google and you'll find dozens if not hundreds of companies founded to manage accounts. Unless it's some small cracked up russian chick with 12 followers, it's safe to assume you're talking to a dude or an AI when you spend dollars to message some egirl. The bigger ones probably don't do anything but supply the agency with some pics and short vids once a month, and leave the entire stuff to them.

And no this isn't a big secret. To be fair, it's not different from streamers or other 'content creators'. Internet grifters don't rely on a million people giving a dollar, they rely on finding the whales, the mentally ill losers they can milk of their money and time. And unlike some tranny killed by New Zealand Agriculturalists gossiping, nobody will give a fuck when a 28 year old dude with no real friends kills himself, so nobody ever gets in trouble.
A good rule of thumb to gauge if an e-ho is managing the account herself or if she's managed by a team is the number of reactions to media. If she has a sizeable media count but only a handful of reactions per post, then it's likely she's managing the account herself. If she has dozens to hundreds of reactions per post and a heavy media presence, she's being managed. Also, when is she online? If she's online for greater 5 hours a day, she's being managed. If she's online for only a handful of hours per day, she's an independent operator.
 
A good rule of thumb to gauge if an e-ho is managing the account herself or if she's managed by a team is the number of reactions to media. If she has a sizeable media count but only a handful of reactions per post, then it's likely she's managing the account herself. If she has dozens to hundreds of reactions per post and a heavy media presence, she's being managed. Also, when is she online? If she's online for greater 5 hours a day, she's being managed. If she's online for only a handful of hours per day, she's an independent operator.
You're not wrong, but to be honest, you can also just look at what they write:
dum.png
It's like the modern equivalent of the Nigerian prince e-mail. You have to be wilfully retarded to make yourself believe that's not some pajeet or robot or equivalent. Thankfully simps are wilfully retarded.
 
OnlyFans glows hard. It's just one of many, many things designed to demoralize the population. It's right up there with those gross-ass AI girlfriend apps.
Do they, though? Internet porn has been big business for a hell of a long time now. I find it hard to believe that it's all the result of a multi-decade glow-op and not the predictable result of pathetic horny dudes with no shame or self-respect.
 
Do they, though? Internet porn has been big business for a hell of a long time now. I find it hard to believe that it's all the result of a multi-decade glow-op and not the predictable result of pathetic horny dudes with no shame or self-respect.
There have been countless porn sites over the decades, but places like OnlyFans and PornHub feel like they glow because they somehow permeated the mainstream. You never heard the likes of John Cena mentioning Stickam back when that was big.

Shit, man, I always figured Playboy glowed too.
 
I think it's more that celebrating whores fits in with the recent woke zeitgeist, and the main victims are lonely people with a bit of disposable income and no self esteem. So mostly young white dudes.

The lefty establishment can't rock the boat because their people are ravenous hyenas to any perceived slight, and the righty establishment probably just thinks it's porn, and streams are like tv. I doubt many boomer politicians even really know simps are spending 2000+ hours a year of free labor working for strangers on the internet and/or donating life changing money. Without so much as an age restriction or a spending limit.

And as I mentioned before, 28 year old white dude who spends his life online simping killing himself when he finally realizes he's fucked his life is not gonna be investigated or reported on. The police will take one look at it and go "well sure, I'd kill myself too".
 
I just genuinely pity them
I don't pity a bunch of awful whores who manipulate sometimes even underage boys into parasocial relantionships where they constantly play pretend girlfriend to boys and men who are completely alone in hopes of getting all of their money.

Remember the wacko who killed his parents after wasting all of their money (hundreds of thousands of dollars) on an OF ewhore? she didn't give a damn about what happened because of her, she was interviewed about it and couldn't give less of a shit.

But sure feel bad about these sociopath bitches...
Prostitutes used to call that their "regulars." Nothing's new under the sun, son.
At least with a hoe you get laid, these ewhores wont even remember your name bro.
Are they really that money-minded
Yes.
So mostly young white dudes.
You would be amazed how many asians, pajeets and arabs are in there. The meme most incels are white its journo cope because the reality is that the movement itself was started by black dudes and minorities make the bulk of incels, but it would be bad optics for a bunch of white women to tell minority men to rope so they focus on the white ones instead.
nobody will give a fuck when a 28 year old dude with no real friends kills himself, so nobody ever gets in trouble.
Yep pretty much, even tradcons ITT are simping about the poor little ewhores being corrupted by society.

Meanwhile an entire generation of boys is growing up thinking that giving money to a slut on twitch is a relationship.
 
Última edición:
You're not wrong, but to be honest, you can also just look at what they write:
Ver archivo adjunto 5889197
It's like the modern equivalent of the Nigerian prince e-mail. You have to be wilfully retarded to make yourself believe that's not some pajeet or robot or equivalent. Thankfully simps are wilfully retarded.
It all depends. Lots of e-whores are dumb as rocks, so spelling errors and awkward grammar could indicate the woman herself is managing the account especially if she speaks English as a second language. To me, a bigger tell is if her messaging matches up with the same type of messaging from other e-whores. Heavy use of emojis and reactions are tells. Guilting you over failing to respond is another. If her style is unique, then it's likely she's managing the account. If not, then yeah, she's being managed.

I wonder if these management firms also try to boost/optimize the Internet presence of these whores. There are some that have a surprisingly high amount of reactions per post yet content is rarely leaked which leads me to wonder if subscriber counts can be fudged.

Side note: some whores have enough business savvy to only create spicier content on paid custom request or pay-per-view and do not show the goods on their normal wall. Those that only show hotter content as custom requests have an easier time combating piracy as they'll know who leaked it.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo