- Registrado
- 1 de Sep, 2018
This is the problem. A lot of people don't have the time nor the will to care for their old ones, no matter how much they love them. Imagine Clint Eastwood in Grand Torino, but instead of being able to hold on his own he can barely walk up the steps. If you aren't going to alleviate their burden you better put them out of their misery, because aside from the physical pain they will feel like shit seeing how much they depend on others for stuff like driving or getting into bed.I unironically think euthanasia is more humane than leaving old people waste away in old peoples homes staring at the TV 16 hours a day.
My grandpa was 93 when he died. The last years for him were gruelingly horrible because he was terribly sick and every time i went for a visit he begged me to kill him. This is one of the cases i would support euthanising him because he's clearly suffering and he knew as well as me that he wasn't going to get any better.I don't think there's anything wrong with old people until they need to be looked after. Like my grandpa is 77 and still doing well but I've seen 55 year old women shake and nearly collapse just getting change out of their purse.
As much as I'd like to just kill all useless old people, or people in general, there's no way to do it without there being some serious issues about abuse of such a thing. Euthanasia is the best alternative but there would have to be some serious restrictions on it.
Like you say, human dead wheight is something that before was naturally flushed out by either society or nature but now there are many support nets that allow even the lowest imbecile to hold on his own by using up everyone's money or being supported by others. As good as euthanasia might sound or be, it's something that would ultimately be abused in many ways and i would rather put restrictions on the access to benefits/help rather than kill of the suckers. But you can't do that or else you're a filthy bigot.
