Law Oil giant Shell suing Greenpeace for £1.7m damages - Based oil company sues climate change protestors for trespassing on their ship

1699649270816.png
GREENPEACE
The protest happened in January in the Atlantic


By Louise Hosie
BBC Scotland
1 day ago

Shell is suing Greenpeace for $2.1m (£1.7m) in damages after environmental protesters occupied a vessel transporting one of the oil company's floating platforms earlier this year.

Activists boarded the White Marlin ship north of the Canary Islands in the Atlantic in January.

Shell said it was entitled to recover "the significant costs of responding to Greenpeace's dangerous actions".

However, Greenpeace said it planned to contest the action.

The environmental group described it as "one of the biggest legal threats" in its history.
The White Marlin was transporting the platform to Shell's Penguins oilfield in the North Sea when it was occupied.

The Penguins field, which was discovered in 1974, is about 150 miles (241km) north east of Shetland.

Activists campaigning against fossil fuels and oil drilling used inflatable boats to reach the Shell-contracted ship, before hoisting themselves onto it with ropes.

They remained on board for 13 days until the ship reached Norway.

1699649315144.png
GREENPEACE
Activists boarded the White Marlin ship north of the Canary Islands


At the time Shell was granted an injunction to prevent more activists boarding. Now court papers show it is seeking damages from Greenpeace.

A Shell statement said: "The right to protest is fundamental and we respect it absolutely. But it must be done safely and lawfully.

"The legal costs to secure two court injunctions to prevent further boarding were significant. So were the costs for the companies who had to deal with the action at sea, for example by mobilising an extra safety vessel, and increasing security at the port.

"The safety of the protesters - as well as the crew - was paramount. Rightly, we did not hesitate to put in place measures to protect all people involved.
"Shell and its contractors are entitled to recover the significant costs of responding to Greenpeace's dangerous actions."

Greenpeace said: "The claim is one of the biggest legal threats against the Greenpeace network's ability to campaign in the organisation's more than 50-year history."

The group said Shell offered to reduce its damage claim to $1.4m (£1.14m) if Greenpeace's activists agreed not to protest again at any of Shell's oil and gas infrastructure at sea or in port.

Greenpeace said it would only do so if Shell complied with a 2021 Dutch court order to cut its emissions by 45% by 2030, which Shell has appealed.
Protests at sea are an established part of Greenpeace's operations.

Source (Archive)
 
Última edición:
Is it wrong for me to want these people to see these "protesters" treated as hijackers and thrown in the brig. I just want to see them get hosed down trying to climb up on the ship. otherwise I guess anyone can just jump on like hobo's hopping unto a train.
 
Greenpeace have always been insufferable. They shoulda read the room on how compassion fatigued the general populace is becoming and how tired of self-important "protestors" we all are..... they deserve whatever they get.
 
Última edición:
I don't really mind green protestors. In their heads, they are probably wrong, but they truly believe they are saving the planet.

However, the ones that take it upon themselves to cause harm and damage to save people are pure hypocrites.
 
So Greenpeace is protesting the seas against oil drilling using rubber dinghies that are made from petroleum products, powered by petroleum motors wearing high visibility equipment and other garb made thanks to petroleum engineering. Here's to 50 years of pointless and wasteful activism.
 
I would support greenpeace if they used guns, that would be so fucking cool, imagine the aesthetic. Also imagine the oil companies being forced to hire mercenaries on the sea, that would be cool too.
 
I hear that's technically attempted piracy under maritime law.
Summary execution would not be out of the question. We're already trending towards cyberpunk dystopia anyways (but the gay, boring, and sanitized version) so I wouldn't mind seeing multinational corporations giving greenpeace faggots "traditional islamic burials" at sea.
 
Why because a Corporation fucks over one of the few things more evil than a Corporation?
That doesn't make it based. Their intent isn't benign nor are they going to turn around and do anything different afterwards.
And it's not like Greenpeace is going away either.

This is two niggers shooting at each other on the street. The only ones getting shot are the people 10 yards away from their targets, the ghetto is still fucked and the 'hood is still riddled with crime and drugs.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo