You really do like to argue. Yes. I've given my answer already. It's an indefensible verse provided it refers to the literal and there is no previous context that makes it an edge case (thought experiment when assessing the laws). But then again, that is what the Rabbis would claim anyway, so I'm inclined to agree with you.
How are the motivations of the publisher tangentially related? If we were discussing the age of the Earth and you gave me a video by Kent Hovind, I'd question your motives.
If it's so easy why couldn't you link a primary source or an archive? You volunteered the information. I'm not wasting my time digging through videos of Rabbis to find them, sorry. Those videos have very clear edits. It might not be exculpatory, but who knows what they were discussing beforehand.
No it isn't. You are aware of deceptive edits in journalism, right? Link the primary sources. If you can't then fair enough. But don't expect me to believe you.
I don't care about Jewish Messianic bullshit. And I don't agree with you on the new world order. That's all there is to it. If they are as aligned in their activities as you believe then they are doing a pretty shit job. Being beheaded in the street by a raging Muslim is more likely for me in the short term.
Edited video. No primary source. From a channel that promotes 9/11 truther content. If you can't see a problem with that then you are not intellectually honest. I don't think you're an idiot. Link the unedited videos or give me a source. I don't agree with the Rabbi in the second video, just like I don't agree with the Immams and Priests that preach their garden variety of supremacy. I don't distinguish between the three, except that I think Islam is more of a risk in the short term. Otherwise, they are equally shit in my opinion.
This entire retarded back and forth started because you responded to a lighthearted meme. After you chose to point out NSFL passages in the Torah in response to MATI flailing around in the thread. MATI is some Christian boomer. He, like me, isn't going to know the ins-and-outs of Judaism. Do Jews haunt you dreams? Touch grass.
You claimed that I said that Israel has nothing to do with Judaism, and quote me pointing out that Israel happens to be the one Jewish state? Tell me again how this supports your point? Wasn't this discussion in relation to the Abraham accords, which you framed as beneficial to Jews exclusively.
They were in the interests of Israel. Not purely the Jews.
I asked for the source of the list of NGOs you provided. Surely that same source cites other religious and secular NGOs that perform the same role as the Judeo-Christian ones? Or is it that you don't have them to hand like the others?
You are saying I didn't agree? Did I not immediately respond with the following:
I have no doubt that they wouldn't side with me. It's all about interpretations. This is nothing new. You can go to ten different sermons on the same Biblical account and hear close to ten different interpretations. I fail to see how the West vs. East argument you present wouldn't be interpretted differently between different groups.
I already said I'm not joining in that discussion. I've given you my view and I think I understand yours. I won't be bringing it up again.
In the autistic spectrum of anti-religious antagonism I am just not as autistically against Judaism as you. That's all. Nothing I have said is defending their practices. I just don't think that Jews run the world. Capiche?
Apologies, I must have missed it. Could you link it again please.
A man that existed around the times that are described and who was probably crucified. That's about it. AFAIK that's the generally accepted view of scholars like Bart Ehrman.
Última edición:
