Official Kiwifarms Edgy Atheist Thread - where we make fun of all sorts of sky daddy believers

which ones are the worst?

  • christards

  • muzzies

  • foreskin munchers

  • pagans

  • cow worshippers

  • self-hating atheists ("I rEsPeCt ReLiGiOuS pEoPlE")

  • other


Los resultados solo se pueden ver después de votar.
GPWBLx4XgAApCej.jpg

| . . . /
| . . /
| . /
| /
711jenrejic91.gif
 
Today's mythology is yesterday's religion, and they all had immoral, retarded beliefs.
Do you (and everyone else in the thread) think that it'll always be a cycle of different faiths replacing each other or there'll be a point when a majority of population picks up atheism?
For example, about 70% of Americans consider themselves religious, what do you consider more likely to happen at some point - 70% of Americans will switch to Voodooism or something like that or 70% of Americans will be atheists?
Also, if you think the future is mostly/predominantly atheist (I mean both individual countries and the world as a whole), how will it be achieved? A good chunk of populace will decide they don't feel like being religious (like how atheism has grown in the West) or it will be forced from the top at a gun point (a-la USSR, Socialist Block, China, Anarchist Catalonia)?
 
Do you (and everyone else in the thread) think that it'll always be a cycle of different faiths replacing each other or there'll be a point when a majority of population picks up atheism?
For example, about 70% of Americans consider themselves religious, what do you consider more likely to happen at some point - 70% of Americans will switch to Voodooism or something like that or 70% of Americans will be atheists?
Also, if you think the future is mostly/predominantly atheist (I mean both individual countries and the world as a whole), how will it be achieved? A good chunk of populace will decide they don't feel like being religious (like how atheism has grown in the West) or it will be forced from the top at a gun point (a-la USSR, Socialist Block, China, Anarchist Catalonia)?
I think religion will survive as a cultural thing. Already leaning that way in the UK churches becoming more like social clubs and event venues (weddings, funerals, baptisms) rather than places of worship.

People like their tradition and the tradition of their forbears, I've known atheists to get their kid baptised because they were and they wanted an excuse to have friends and family come together and celebrate with them.
 
Obviously, God put the dinosaur bones into the ground to confuse us.

It's a test of faith bro. If you don't trust that the Earth is actually only 6000 years old then you're going straight to Hell, do not pass go, do not collect two hundred dollars.

Do you (and everyone else in the thread) think that it'll always be a cycle of different faiths replacing each other or there'll be a point when a majority of population picks up atheism?
For example, about 70% of Americans consider themselves religious, what do you consider more likely to happen at some point - 70% of Americans will switch to Voodooism or something like that or 70% of Americans will be atheists?
Also, if you think the future is mostly/predominantly atheist (I mean both individual countries and the world as a whole), how will it be achieved? A good chunk of populace will decide they don't feel like being religious (like how atheism has grown in the West) or it will be forced from the top at a gun point (a-la USSR, Socialist Block, China, Anarchist Catalonia)?

Depends what you count as a religion. I would say things like communism, libertarianism and utilitarianism are functionally religions, in the sense that they provide an over-arching moral framework through which their adherents interpret the world.
 
Do you (and everyone else in the thread) think that it'll always be a cycle of different faiths replacing each other or there'll be a point when a majority of population picks up atheism?
People will always have beliefs.

Shinto or the ancient European religions, for example, are very different from the monotheistic ones.
They aren't as dogmatic and psychotic at their foundations.
And they are far superior in their morals to Abrahamism. Most of them have a racial component tying a people to a land and its history, which is a good thing. If you hold the view that the land you live on and its people have spiritual value, you will take better care of it.
Japan still has many of its Shinto traditions, especially outside of Tokyo, and the view that land is spiritually important is fairly obvious in how it looks.

If you read ancient European stories, you can clearly see everything that is considered good in the West already there. If you look at pre-Christian laws, you can already see the values of the modern-day West reflected.

There are many interesting theories about how Judaism really started, which in turn created first Christianity followed by Islam, arguably the worst religions. My favorite theory is that it was a cult started by rich merchants to protect their wealth within the Temple.
The entire "history" found in the Old Testament is provably made-up nonsense, with some of it being plagiarized from earlier religions and other parts made up whole cloth.
Hebrews were just regular Arabs who started to follow a new religion and adopted a new identity somewhere between 1000 - 500 BC.
And it's a fascinating ideology; most other religions have the view of their followers being great and their land being great, but Judaism is built on the idea of the other being evil and nature being evil and only Hashem being a force of good.

The fable of Jacob and Esau is the defining meme for Jewish identity, and you can find it festering even in Jews who claim to be atheists.

It brainwashes its followers into believing that anyone outside their cult is created with envy, hate, and deceit in their soul.
It's fairly obvious that with this belief, you are always morally justified to do anything to the outgroup since they are ontologically evil and are always plotting to exterminate the ingroup.
This is why Hadrian had to put an end to their insane Temple cult.

A bunch of Jews went to Greece and coped with their defeat by inventing Christianity, a power fantasy of Hashem conquering Rome spiritually. Some went into exile in Arab countries and invented Islam as another cope of Hashem conquering the world.
Both have the same anti-nature, anti-human rotten core as Judaism.

I don't know that much about Buddhism, but I assume it has a rotten core because it eradicated many local spiritual traditions.

I hope these monotheistic religions go away, especially Abrahamism, since it's foundationally anti-nature and anti-human.

Atheism is a vague term because religion and god are extremely broad terms.
Most atheists delude themselves into believing they have come to a worldview based on reality.
The reality is they didn't achieve more enlightened metaphysical views; they simply realized that those of dominant religions are bad.
There is nothing you can know for sure outside of your own existence, so metaphysical frameworks are a necessity to being a functioning, thinking human.
For example, about 70% of Americans consider themselves religious, what do you consider more likely to happen at some point - 70% of Americans will switch to Voodooism or something like that or 70% of Americans will be atheists?
I think I am a dementoid, and most normal people will always adopt premade metaphysical frameworks. Most don't want to learn the ideas of Plato, Pythagoras, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, etc. They don't care about the "why"; they just want to live their lives.
Also, if you think the future is mostly/predominantly atheist (I mean both individual countries and the world as a whole), how will it be achieved?
I don't. Atheism is an opposition movement, so just like conservatism, it will never win against movements that have a vision for the future.
A good chunk of populace will decide they don't feel like being religious (like how atheism has grown in the West) or it will be forced from the top at a gun point (a-la USSR, Socialist Block, China, Anarchist Catalonia)?
As stated above, atheism doesn't have any teeth. Communism, on the other hand, has a vision for the future, so it has the force to destroy competing ideologies. In my opinion, communism is just another perverse ideology that grew out of the Abrahamic framework.
 
Última edición:
I don't know that much about Buddhism, but I assume it has a rotten core because it eradicated many local spiritual traditions.
I think if I were born in different circumstances I'd've probably been a buddhist, because at least it's internally consistent.
I don't know as much about it as I'd like to, but the one thing I do admire about buddhism (or Zen buddhism at least) is that it teaches ephemerality and doesn't dupe you into clinging to earthly things like Jeezo or Muhammad does, because as much as Abrahamics like to cope about there being a world beyond this one, their conception of the ethereal is really bleak and mundane.

I've heard from a lot of Christians that they think it's nihilistic because it posits that the world is nothing but suffering and the only way to escape suffering is to achieve oblivion. But I think Christianity and the Abrahamic faiths in general are way more nihilistic. I mean, the core of it is that you exist to glorify and please a being who is exempt from all the rules you must kowtow to in order to be allowed to witness happiness. I think being born to be a will-less cog in a divine machine is way more nihilistic and existentially terrifying.
 
Do you (and everyone else in the thread) think that it'll always be a cycle of different faiths replacing each other or there'll be a point when a majority of population picks up atheism?
For example, about 70% of Americans consider themselves religious, what do you consider more likely to happen at some point - 70% of Americans will switch to Voodooism or something like that or 70% of Americans will be atheists?
Also, if you think the future is mostly/predominantly atheist (I mean both individual countries and the world as a whole), how will it be achieved? A good chunk of populace will decide they don't feel like being religious (like how atheism has grown in the West) or it will be forced from the top at a gun point (a-la USSR, Socialist Block, China, Anarchist Catalonia)?
There was a saying among new atheist circles that went "the internet is where all religions come to die". Ideas undergo survival of the fittest just like living organisms do, and as the information age continues to disinfect magic bullshit with sunlight, more and more people will drift away from religion. We're already at a point where atheism and irreligiosity are more prevalent than they've ever been in our history. Can Voodooism withstand the same scrutiny that Christianity has crumbled under? If not, then there's your answer.

I think atheism will keep spreading organically rather than being forced at gunpoint (although that'd be pretty based).

I wish nigger. I wish we had our own shabbos goyim.
As an atheist, I wish I had my own shabbos goyim too. You and I could then use our shabbos goyim for Pokemon battles.
 
Última edición:
I love teasing niggas that believe in god - and especially heaven. I like to look at them straight in the eye and ask “so if a new born dies, does it go to heaven as a crying new born and stay like that forever? Do angels change its diapers? Does it even want or need milk?”.

They never, really ever thought it through very much.
 
I love teasing niggas that believe in god - and especially heaven. I like to look at them straight in the eye and ask “so if a new born dies, does it go to heaven as a crying new born and stay like that forever? Do angels change its diapers? Does it even want or need milk?”.

They never, really ever thought it through very much.
Asking the hard questions.
 
I think if I were born in different circumstances I'd've probably been a buddhist, because at least it's internally consistent.
I don't know as much about it as I'd like to, but the one thing I do admire about buddhism (or Zen buddhism at least) is that it teaches ephemerality and doesn't dupe you into clinging to earthly things like Jeezo or Muhammad does, because as much as Abrahamics like to cope about there being a world beyond this one, their conception of the ethereal is really bleak and mundane.

I've heard from a lot of Christians that they think it's nihilistic because it posits that the world is nothing but suffering and the only way to escape suffering is to achieve oblivion. But I think Christianity and the Abrahamic faiths in general are way more nihilistic. I mean, the core of it is that you exist to glorify and please a being who is exempt from all the rules you must kowtow to in order to be allowed to witness happiness. I think being born to be a will-less cog in a divine machine is way more nihilistic and existentially terrifying.
I also only know surface-level stuff about Buddhism and, like most Westerners, mostly Zen Buddhism, but I doubt it's as bad as Abrahamism.

Abrahamic religions are extremely nihilistic and negative. They all say everything is bad, fallen, and under the control of Satan on Earth, so you have to grovel before Hashem to be saved. It's an ugly ideology that came from the ugly minds of ugly people.
 
Última edición:
No religious person could ever answer my childhood question of “Can God microwave a burrito so hot even he couldn’t eat it?”

Checkmate, KKKristians!
 
Atrás
Top Abajo