- Registrado
- 16 de Jun, 2017
I saw journo/editorial staffers worried about b about a month or so back on Twitter.Options so far are:
a) Plain incompetence
b) IT staff revolt
c) Gay planned leak
d) Fake and gay planned leak
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
I saw journo/editorial staffers worried about b about a month or so back on Twitter.Options so far are:
a) Plain incompetence
b) IT staff revolt
c) Gay planned leak
d) Fake and gay planned leak
Any claims against the Bidens are wholly unfounded. That's not a Biden campaign claim or a Biden claim . That's an irrefutable fact (points below )

There's a U//FOUO Law Enforcement Sensitive DHS report at https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/portland-intelligence-assessment/65e0a41de45b7abc/full.pdf - Would Null be pissed if the pdf were posted here?
Also there's a bunch more shit at https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper if you search on that instead, or just do https://int.nyt.com/data/
This is actually really fucking big, I hope it all gets archived before the NYT goes full DFE.
That's about DoS personnel suffering from unexplained neurological disorders a couple of years ago.Something involving the NSA and Beck? I don't really understand it all.
Document where Steele admits dossier is fake @It's HK-47
Uh. Jesus fucking Christ. A lot of this is bad. How bad is the crackdown going to be to memory-hole all of this?
There's also something involving Manafort in an earlier postVer archivo adjunto 1516169
Holy shit I love 2020 so much. This entire year's script was written by a Magic 8 Ball.

Where exactly does it say that the dossier is fake? My legalese isn't too good and I skimmed over it, couldn't find the part where it mentions that.Document where Steele admits dossier is fake @It's HK-47
I'm confused, this is just 16 pages of Britain bitching about Zoom. I mean, fair enough but not exactly why I opened the PDF lol.Document where Steele admits dossier is fake @It's HK-47
Idk, my legalese is bad too, just relying on person on /pol/ saying that this was it.Where exactly does it say that the dossier is fake? My legalese isn't too good and I skimmed over it, couldn't find the part where it mentions that.
It's hard evidence of multiple things that yesterday were discredited right wing conspiracies.Can someone spell out how big this might be so idiots (like me) can understand the ramifications?
I would assume it gets disappears into the Ministry of Truth (if it isn't all fake already), but is there a chance any of this leads to actual consequences?