🐱 Now The School Censors Have Come For Maus

CatParty


Content warning: suicide, the Holocaust, small-minded censorship
The school board in McMinn County, Tennessee, voted unanimously earlier this month to ban Art Spiegelman's Maus, a Holocaust memoir in graphic novel form, from its eighth-grade Language Arts classes. The vote took place on January 10, but only started getting media attention yesterday — and the attention blew up immediately.
No surprise there: Maus is a uniquely brilliant work of storytelling in comics form, a memoir of Spiegelman's father's survival of the Holocaust and of the fraught relationship between Spiegelman and his father, Vladek. Spiegelman turns comic-book cliché on its head, depicting Jews as mice and Germans as cats, and telling his father's story with the scrupulous accuracy of a biographer. It was the first graphic novel (although let's be clear; it's nonfiction) to be awarded a Pulitzer Prize, and played a huge role in making clear that comics can be very serious works for grown-ups. Millions of people have been moved by Maus'sdepictions of the Holocaust and of generational trauma.
The McMinn County School Board banned it because it contained eight curse words and "naked pictures." More about that in a moment.

This One Hurts​

Maus is simply one of the best books I've ever read, and part of what makes it so important is its genre-busting use of words and images to tell a very serious story. The cat and mouse imagery isn't simply a riff on cartoon iconography; it's also a very deliberate reference to Nazi propaganda that depicted Jews as vermin. Calling it a graphic novel isn't even quite right: When the second volume came out in 1991 and hit the New York Timesbestseller list, Spiegelman successfully lobbied the paper to switch Maus from the "fiction" to the "nonfiction" category.
As the story progresses, Spiegelman also uses the cat/mouse imagery to make us question where we get these ideas of identity anyway. The second volume features a scene outside the book's main narrative, with Spiegelman talking to his therapist about the problems he's having with the work — but both are drawn this time as humans wearing mouse masks, to clearly distinguish that notions of identity can be both absurdly arbitrary and, in the context of Nazi Germany, deadly serious. A fair-use sample of how Spiegelman plays with that theme of identity:

B9D5B042-4F80-4AC7-9525-CA4EE4351FA7.jpeg

They Don't Know Art, But They Know Dirty Words When They See 'Em​

None of that, of course, was involved in the McMinn County School Board's decision to remove Maus. I read the minutes of the school board meeting, and the objections to the book really did come down to some board members' objections to cuss words and nudity, particularly a tiny drawing depicting the naked corpse of Spiegelman's mother, who killed herself by cutting her wrists in the bathtub.

It seems that the board's initial idea to make Maus fit for eighth graders (I'd rather see it used in high school; the students would get more out of it) was to simply use white-out to redact all the bad words, and the image of the dead naked lady. Board member Tony Allman found the language so objectionable that he had to spell out "b-i-t-c-h" in the board meeting. He also complained about Spiegelman's depictions of Nazi atrocities: "It shows people hanging, it shows them killing kids, why does the educational system promote this kind of stuff, it is not wise or healthy."

Allman later acknowledged that the Holocaust was bad, but the cusses and nakeds still bothered him:

I am not denying it was horrible, brutal, and cruel. It’s like when you’re watching tv and a cuss word or nude scene comes on it would be the same movie without it. Well, this would be the same book without it.
He went on to suggest that the book is probably too contaminated anyway, because "this guy that created the artwork used to do the graphics for Playboy." (Fact check: He did a few comics for the magazine in the 70s.) Therefore,

You can look at his history, and we’re letting him do graphics in books for students in elementary school. If I had a child in the eighth grade, this ain’t happening. If I had to move him out and homeschool him or put him somewhere else, this is not happening.
Two school district employees, Instructional Supervisor Julie Goodin and Federal Programs Supervisor Melasawn Knight, argued that the book was in fact age-appropriate, because of course a book about the Holocaust will show bad things — that's the point. Goodin said she'd hate to have kids lose the opportunity to read Maus, and said she wanted her own eighth grader to read it, even if it were withdrawn from the curriculum. As for the cusses, Goodin asked, "Are we going to be teaching these words outside of this book as vocabulary words? No, you know me better than that Tony Allman." (Lordy how I wish there was video.)

Much of the meeting veered off into frustration about state reading standards, but the conversation kept coming back to the bad words in Maus, however nonsensically. All the board members said it's important for kids to learn about the Holocaust, but couldn't the children read about genocide in a more seemly text, without eight cuss words and a naked corpse?



The Forever Culture War​

Board member Mike Cochran was simply fed up with all the nastiness — he never needed books with cusses when he was in school. And sure, the history in Maus is good, but why did kids have to see the parts about the mother's suicide and all the parts where Spiegelman and his father argue, anyway? He seems to have forgotten Maus is being used in the Language Arts curriculum, as literature, not as a history text.

A lot of the cussing had to do with the son cussing out the father, so I don’t really know how that teaches our kids any kind of ethical stuff. It’s just the opposite, instead of treating his father with some kind of respect, he treated his father like he was the victim.

We don’t need this stuff to teach kids history. We can teach them history and we can teach them graphic history. We can tell them exactly what happened, but we don’t need all the nakedness and all the other stuff.
Cochran also complained that the schools aren't giving kids enough spelling and grammar drills, because that's what matters, not some artsy fartsy comic book with all the nakedness and cursing. Cochran also went on a weird digression about how "the entire curriculum is developed to normalize sexuality, normalize nudity and normalize vulgar language," but others reminded him the meeting was only about Maus.

Another board member, Jonathan Pierce, argued that the book was simply illegal, or at least that "the wording in this book is in direct conflict of some of our policies." As an example, he offered something that isn't in Maus at all: "If I said on the school bus that I was going to kill you, we would be bringing disciplinary action against that child."

Eventually, the board voted unanimously, 10 to zero, to remove Maus from the curriculum.



What's The Matter With Tennessee?​

Spiegelman told CNBC that the school board's decision was "Orwellian," and that "I’m kind of baffled by this. [...] It’s leaving me with my jaw open, like, ‘What?’”

Spiegelman added that he suspected the complaints about the language and nudity were less of a motivation for banning the book than a pretext to remove a book about the Holocaust and the ongoing trauma it caused for survivors and their families, as exemplified by the suicide of his mother — also a survivor of the camps — when he was 20.

“I’ve met so many young people who ... have learned things from my book,” said Spiegelman about “Maus.” [...]

“I also understand that Tennessee is obviously demented,” said Spiegelman. “There’s something going on very, very haywire there.”
Also, by way of commenting on the news, Spiegelman sent the Daily Beast a bookmarkhe'd designed a few years back for Banned Books Week.

The one good thing about this whole stupid mess is that it's sure to drive new sales of Maus, a groundbreaking work that everyone should read or re-read — even if it is too dirty for middle schoolers in McMinn County, Tennessee.

[TN Holler / CNBC / Daily Beast / The Complete Maus]

Yr Wonkette is funded entirely by reader donations. If you can, please give $5 or $10 a month to help us keep this little mommyblog and literary salon going! And if you buy The Complete Maus with this linky, Yr Wonkette gets a bit of the payment too!
 
Man, remember when Stephen King was actually counter-culture and good at writing? Back before he got hit by a car?

Also, Art Spiegelman, the writer of Maus, did illustrations for Garbage Pail Kids. So, that’s a fact you now know.
Somewhere in the multiverse the car crash killed him and art still did that
 
Man, remember when Stephen King was actually counter-culture and good at writing? Back before he got hit by a car?

Also, Art Spiegelman, the writer of Maus, did illustrations for Garbage Pail Kids. So, that’s a fact you now know.

They installed a chip in his head when they were doing surgery after the car accident. They saw their opportunity and took it.
 
I don't know what the point is making an article about a book ban is some dunderhead county. It sounds like these guys were just following their own guidelines. Unless there was a nation/state wide ban who really cares? If a kid brought in a copy of Maus I doubt anyone would care to do anything about it. These are eighth graders I'm sure they seen worse than what Maus actually shows. Also Maus slaps, I have a hardback copy proudly on my bookshelf with my other big boy books.
Conservative public School employees are just as insane as liberal public School employees. This will be enforced.

This ban is absurd, and conservatism will forever be crippled by these types of conservatives.
 
And yet they still don't do it as much as the right does. What's your point?

This is just incorrect. Textbook wars and curriculum wars have been coming from both directions in a very similar way for a long time.

Diane Ravitch has a great book on this called The Language Police. Very even-handed and interesting, especially since most education schools only cover right-wing censorship movements and not left-wing ones.
 
nooo not the holocaust! this is the only atrocity in the history of the mankind that matters!
I can think of other atrocities worse than or as bad as the Holocaust let’s see Armenia Genocide,holodomor,great leap forward or cultural revolution, the Balkan genocide, killing fields, Rwanda genocide, rape of Manchuria. Need I say more or continue
 
Didn’t king write a child orgy tho?
King was truly a amazing writer

In the dark sewers they all stood there naked. In a circle. Bev carcassed thier one eyed willys and stroked each penis, including the fat kid. They each took turns entering her young nubile butt, anus and vagina. Covered in the salty volcano like sperm, one hit her in the eye. Owch! Still, bev loved it. Zipping up, they sighed. "OK, Now let's go kill that clown!"

Breathtaking.
 
Why now? My question is, WHY now?

Why NOW its an issue? Never was an issue at my time. At the time of my parents. Why NOW its an issue?

I almost dare suggest that, well, they are just making up controversities at this point
 
Ken penders is fuming and Jews are white privileged ken think about
9CDF4B82-29FA-4F2C-9718-6B9D0FD38221.jpeg
 
This is just incorrect. Textbook wars and curriculum wars have been coming from both directions in a very similar way for a long time.

Diane Ravitch has a great book on this called The Language Police. Very even-handed and interesting, especially since most education schools only cover right-wing censorship movements and not left-wing ones.
Here are some lists of the most challenged books. Are you really going to read that and tell me that 90% of the complainers weren't right wing?

Nobody is denying that lefties are getting worse about censorship, but the right wingers are still very much in the majority when it comes to pearl clutching over literature.
 
Conservative public School employees are just as insane as liberal public School employees. This will be enforced.

This ban is absurd, and conservatism will forever be crippled by these types of conservatives.
It's not banned. It's just not going to be one of the 3 required books they read in 8th grade English. Might be better for kids to read a word type book instead of a picture type book for their English class.
 
Here are some lists of the most challenged books. Are you really going to read that and tell me that 90% of the complainers weren't right wing?

Nobody is denying that lefties are getting worse about censorship, but the right wingers are still very much in the majority when it comes to pearl clutching over literature.

A fair number of those books from recent years are absolutely pornographic with graphic (and sometimes quite rosily portrayed) scenes of grooming and child sex abuse. The ALA has a vested interest in making the reasons for the bans sound unreasonable, but "George" is a book by an autogynephile creep that literally told kids how to evade parents finding out about their porn use, and talks about little kids (the book was supposed to be read by kids age 8, 3rd grade) viewing porn as if that's normal. The fact that ALA pretends this was "for LGBTQIA+ content and a transgender character; because schools and libraries should not “put books in a child’s hand that require discussion”; for sexual references; and for conflicting with a religious viewpoint and “traditional family structure” is crazy when the literal NYT talks about how it was about the fact that "a potential conversation about masturbation is probably not something we want our third, fourth and fifth graders to read."

Beyond Magenta has this little bit in it, which they summarize as "for LGBTQIA+ content, for “its effect on any young people who would read it,” and for concerns that it was sexually explicit and biased"

1643422215746.png


"Sex Is A Funny Word" is practically a groomer's manual and poses major safeguarding concerns for the 8 year old audience it's marketed to, showing images of naked people masturbating in the bath and telling kids it "can be fun and exciting to talk about sex" even though it embarrasses some (probably less mature and with-it, am I right, groomers?) people to talk about with children. Here's some of the pages for 8 year olds, I'm showing several because holy shit this is being taught as the best-ever sex ed book for elementary school children.

1643422838063.png
1643423054024.png
1643422846584.png
1643422979506.png
1643422943553.png
1643422956509.png


PS, the authors of this sex ed book won't call genitals "private parts" and instead call them "middle parts" because any part can be private! These parts are just other parts of the body, nothing to have, you know, hang-ups about!

Some of the bans are clearly political in motivation (the "Marlon Bundo" book is some retarded John Oliver thing that parodied Mike Pence so cons got butthurt), but the idea that you must be "right wing" if you don't want kids subjected to the shit above is ridiculous.

The left needs to stop ceding this ground. Not wanting 8 year olds (these sexually explicit books are for younger and younger kids, two of the three above were specifically marketed to kids as little as 8, remember?) to be peppered with messages by groomers doesn't mean your MAGA hat is arriving in the mail tomorrow, it just means you're a sensible adult who doesn't think you have to offer up your kid's butthole for the sake of diversity and right-think.
 
Última edición:
A fair number of those books from recent years are absolutely pornographic with graphic (and sometimes quite rosily portrayed) scenes of grooming and child sex abuse
I was referring to the complaints about books that acknowledge the existence of gay people, are anti-police, "occult" (ie: Harry Potter and Halloween ABC), and "promote Islam" (ie. portray non-Christian characters). Even if you take the sexually explicit books out of the equation, the vast majority of the people complaining are right wing.
 
A fair number of those books from recent years are absolutely pornographic with graphic (and sometimes quite rosily portrayed) scenes of grooming and child sex abuse. The ALA has a vested interest in making the reasons for the bans sound unreasonable, but "George" is a book by an autogynephile creep that literally told kids how to evade parents finding out about their porn use, and talks about little kids (the book was supposed to be read by kids age 8, 3rd grade) viewing porn as if that's normal. The fact that ALA pretends this was "for LGBTQIA+ content and a transgender character; because schools and libraries should not “put books in a child’s hand that require discussion”; for sexual references; and for conflicting with a religious viewpoint and “traditional family structure” is crazy when the literal NYT talks about how it was about the fact that "a potential conversation about masturbation is probably not something we want our third, fourth and fifth graders to read."

Beyond Magenta has this little bit in it, which they summarize as "for LGBTQIA+ content, for “its effect on any young people who would read it,” and for concerns that it was sexually explicit and biased"

Ver archivo adjunto 2930563

"Sex Is A Funny Word" is practically a groomer's manual and poses major safeguarding concerns for the 8 year old audience it's marketed to, showing images of naked people masturbating in the bath and telling kids it "can be fun and exciting to talk about sex" even though it embarrasses some (probably less mature and with-it, am I right, groomers?) people to talk about with children. Here's some of the pages for 8 year olds, I'm showing several because holy shit this is being taught as the best-ever sex ed book for elementary school children.

Ver archivo adjunto 2930578Ver archivo adjunto 2930591Ver archivo adjunto 2930580Ver archivo adjunto 2930587Ver archivo adjunto 2930583Ver archivo adjunto 2930585

PS, the authors of this sex ed book won't call genitals "private parts" and instead call them "middle parts" because any part can be private! These parts are just other parts of the body, nothing to have, you know, hang-ups about!

Some of the bans are clearly political in motivation (the "Marlon Bundo" book is some retarded John Oliver thing that parodied Mike Pence so cons got butthurt), but the idea that you must be "right wing" if you don't want kids subjected to the shit above is ridiculous.

The left needs to stop ceding this ground. Not wanting 8 year olds (these sexually explicit books are for younger and younger kids, two of the three above were specifically marketed to kids as little as 8, remember?) to be peppered with messages by groomers doesn't mean your MAGA hat is arriving in the mail tomorrow, it just means you're a sensible adult who doesn't think you have to offer up your kid's butthole for the sake of diversity and right-think.
Yeah, the shit you posted definitely should be yeeted from any and every school that exists. How this is percieved as anything other than openly trying to force kids into becoming sexually active at younger ages so nonces can try to fuck them is beyond me.

Kinda find it funny how some of the people screeching about "ebil right wingers bannin' muh books!!!1!!1!" are often dead silent when leftist infested schoolboards do the same shit with works like The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn or To Kill a Mockingbird.
 
A fair number of those books from recent years are absolutely pornographic with graphic (and sometimes quite rosily portrayed) scenes of grooming and child sex abuse. The ALA has a vested interest in making the reasons for the bans sound unreasonable, but "George" is a book by an autogynephile creep that literally told kids how to evade parents finding out about their porn use, and talks about little kids (the book was supposed to be read by kids age 8, 3rd grade) viewing porn as if that's normal. The fact that ALA pretends this was "for LGBTQIA+ content and a transgender character; because schools and libraries should not “put books in a child’s hand that require discussion”; for sexual references; and for conflicting with a religious viewpoint and “traditional family structure” is crazy when the literal NYT talks about how it was about the fact that "a potential conversation about masturbation is probably not something we want our third, fourth and fifth graders to read."

Beyond Magenta has this little bit in it, which they summarize as "for LGBTQIA+ content, for “its effect on any young people who would read it,” and for concerns that it was sexually explicit and biased"

Ver archivo adjunto 2930563

"Sex Is A Funny Word" is practically a groomer's manual and poses major safeguarding concerns for the 8 year old audience it's marketed to, showing images of naked people masturbating in the bath and telling kids it "can be fun and exciting to talk about sex" even though it embarrasses some (probably less mature and with-it, am I right, groomers?) people to talk about with children. Here's some of the pages for 8 year olds, I'm showing several because holy shit this is being taught as the best-ever sex ed book for elementary school children.

Ver archivo adjunto 2930578Ver archivo adjunto 2930591Ver archivo adjunto 2930580Ver archivo adjunto 2930587Ver archivo adjunto 2930583Ver archivo adjunto 2930585

PS, the authors of this sex ed book won't call genitals "private parts" and instead call them "middle parts" because any part can be private! These parts are just other parts of the body, nothing to have, you know, hang-ups about!

Some of the bans are clearly political in motivation (the "Marlon Bundo" book is some retarded John Oliver thing that parodied Mike Pence so cons got butthurt), but the idea that you must be "right wing" if you don't want kids subjected to the shit above is ridiculous.

The left needs to stop ceding this ground. Not wanting 8 year olds (these sexually explicit books are for younger and younger kids, two of the three above were specifically marketed to kids as little as 8, remember?) to be peppered with messages by groomers doesn't mean your MAGA hat is arriving in the mail tomorrow, it just means you're a sensible adult who doesn't think you have to offer up your kid's butthole for the sake of diversity and right-think.
The highlighted section of the book specifically instructs kids to flee from pedos. Most of it is just basic sex ed with a strange artstyle.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo