Estás usando un navegador desactualizado. Es posible que no muestre este u otros sitios web correctamente. Deberías actualizar o usar un navegador alternativo.
💀 HorrorcowNicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing Redditor who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger cuck visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron in third person on REDDIT. Wife's bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.
🔧 Site instability resolved. You can report double-posts and broken attachments. For bigger issues, use the Technical Grievances thread.
🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading. Create account
Not paying attention to Rekieta for a few months is a scary experience. I thought he looked bad then and he's gotten so much worse. It's like a long form "Faces of Meth" PSA.
To defend her a bit, she has gone on with the stated intent of correcting mis-information. I agree she should not become a regular, but from what I have seen, she has been on task.
As you can see, she is not only on-task but also acutely aware Nina is a stupid fuck and a lost cause. She's done talking with her. Sometimes you try to reason with somebody, but they turn out to be more unreasonable than you were hoping. It's a product of trying to be a good person. K is a good decent person.
Given the Cokestream was a result of his losing his appeal to Monty, I suppose it's possible we might be in for another epic crashout depending on how the 5th goes. He certainly seems more messed up than usual lately.
Your honor, the reason I failed my test is because the bull, without my knowledge or consent, boofed a dime bag of heroin up me while I was tied to the Saint Andrew’s cross and I thought it was “something” else until too late. I was blindfolded and it’s not my fault if you wanna know the truth about it.
Apparently Minnesota only requires ten thosand dollars in property damage coverage. If Nick had insurance Id be flabbergasted if it wasn't state minimum, which would leave him comically underinsured for any actual accident. I hope the Robert lord trust was written by somebody who knows what they're doing.
As you can see, she is not only on-task but also acutely aware Nina is a stupid fuck and a lost cause. She's done talking with her. Sometimes you try to reason with somebody, but they turn out to be more unreasonable than you were hoping. It's a product of trying to be a good person. K is a good decent person.
Given the Cokestream was a result of his losing his appeal to Monty, I suppose it's possible we might be in for another epic crashout depending on how the 5th goes. He certainly seems more messed up than usual lately.
I just wanted to point out JIM FELT, yes, the same now retired officer Felt involved in the drug investigation appears to be an active member of the fire department. HIT THE TARD GONG BUDDY, REKIETA GOT FELTED.
Spicer FD department site (archive).
The police one is a "This shit happened, who was there to call for if/when lawsuits/insurance slap fights happen". There should be at least four reports:
Police report of the crash/investigation (likely to be redacted)
Police report of who was involved (this is the one you are seeing)
Fire report of the incident (partial redaction)
EMS report of the incident (Fire/EMS appear to be separate in this area)
Hospital patient report
Minnesota Department of Public Safety report (?)
I believe under MN the FOIA rules, the FD incident report (sans patient info) should be a public record and can be accessed via FOIA or in the courthouse @MNPublicRecords. I believe the EMS/Hospital report is unlikely to be a public record. Even if the EMS report is it is likely to be filled with redactions. The Fire report would likely be redacted partially, but would contain detail descriptions of the state of vehicles involved, and the layout and arrangement of the vehicles during the inital scene response.
So was the van towed away after the crash? Because I think it would be hilarious if the police had All Care Towing (one of Steel Toes long time sponsors) come out and take the van away
Was it in "drivable" condition (likely no, frontal collision at speed = likely totaled engine), was there another driver that was otw (probably no, kayla doesn't drive?), and did said driver arrived before patient was transferred to the hospital are the two questions to the answer you seek.
Also I wonder if we can spot the listing in a local junkyard or map...
lol no. Get on streetview and take a tour of Minnesota or any midwestern state, sometime. Count the cameras you see at intersections on rural roads. The gravel place security cams are private, so we won't get a record and no FOIA unless this ends up in court somehow.
Given the operator of the loader is listed... It's possible he could request the footage and release it... Or, he could request the Fire Department's incident report sans patient data (unless he sued, then they all come out in court).
Or he could give an interview or advocate for crackets to get his license revoked. The last one is the funniest but unlikely to happen.
The mistake is to give her any attention.
If she gets shit wrong, let Nick correct it.
Who gives a fuck if a retard wine mom with 3 listeners on an X-Space makes up shit about Nick?
Nobody.
Engaging with these people is what they want, and she gave that kookoo Karen exactly what she wanted, and now she will turn to spreading lies about Momma K next, because "getting it right" was never the purpose.
The mistake is to give her any attention.
If she gets shit wrong, let Nick correct it.
Who gives a fuck if a retard wine mom with 3 listeners on an X-Space makes up shit about Nick?
Nobody.
Engaging with these people is what they want, and she gave that kookoo Karen exactly what she wanted, and now she will turn to spreading lies about Momma K next, because "getting it right" was never the purpose.
Mama K really aught to stay away from drama vultures like Herren and this Nina lady. They are bad news.
There are few if any good “public” characters involved in this sort of content, it’s better to hang out with the anons here or do your own thing if you really want to be on camera.
Jury selection analysis was used to absolutely devastating effect in the OJ Simpson trial. Albert Alschuler's excellent "How to Win the Trial of the the Century: The Ethics of Lord Brougham and the O. J. Simpson Defense Team" (which I linked to) is one of the better write-ups of the trial, but here's the short version: Although both the prosecution and the defense knew that black jurors were more likely to acquit, the defense found that black women were more likely to discount the domestic violence evidence -- evidence that Marcia Clark spent the first ten days of the trial going over as it was critical to her case...
And that's the trap of it all. The defense prevailed and teams have been attempting to replicate that success ever since. But it's a single case with a binary outcome (okay, I guess there's also the possibility of a hung jury). Was victory due to a deep, data-driven (and very expensive) analysis of the jury pool? Or was "get as many blacks on there as you can and cry racism the moment the prosecution tries to bounce any of them" sufficient? Because that seems to be the principle that Cochran followed, based on the account you had in the post. Shiiiiit, put me in a time machine and I'll tell Marcia Clark a strategy that would have worked better than "let OJ stack the jury, what's the worst that can happen."
Now you have civil cases with dueling jury analysts on each side (someone always wins)- is anyone actually checking to see if it's a real advantage, or if it's such a marginal effect that's it's basically noise? It doesn't seem like it. The ubiquity of something is poor evidence of direct efficacy. Just look at polygraphs. As for "rich defendants always have them and often get off" I imagine it's a such a small expense to a truly rich person that they don't even care. I suspect all the other things that rich MFers can pay for in legal defense dwarf whatever effect an expensive analysis can give.
Commentary on why such a practice might become popular even if there's no good evidence for it:
"...Regardless of attorney motivations for purchasing jury consultant services, real‑world demands for jury consultancy services typically do not extend to a need for research that meets the proverbial academic “gold standard” for social scientific work...
Setting aside an attorney’s intellectual curiosity or desire for independent support for the plausibility of an attorney’s “intuition,” another factor fueling attorneys’ demand for jury consultants may be to help mitigate an attorney’s potential legal malpractice exposure. At some point, if lawyers’ use of jury consultants, particularly in high‑stakes cases involving well‑resourced clients, becomes sufficiently common or ubiquitous, it may contribute to an enforceable prevailing professional standard of care for legal services. If such a standard emerges-or is reasonably perceived to have emerged-lawyers falling below such a standard invite some non‑inconsequential risk of professional malpractice exposure.
Indeed, as some commentators observe, “it's no longer an issue of whether to use a trial consultant . . . but which one to use.” Consequently, lawyers may increasingly come to the belief that those “who fail to conduct jury research or engage in other trial preparation techniques could leave themselves open to malpractice claims..."
Finally, an attorney’s clients may also independently contribute to, expect, or even demand jury consultant services. This is especially likely for legally sophisticated or financially well‑off clients engaged in substantial litigation. Similar to many attorneys, however, even otherwise sophisticated clients may also lack technical sophistication in and familiarity with empirical social sciences. While attorneys can endeavor to help “educate” their clients about the potential for jury consultants to add value to a lawsuit, paying clients’ expectations still need to be managed by their legal counsel..."
In any case, whatever marginal or amazing returns these analysis can get for an attorney picking jurors, it's just a circle-jerk for "lawtube" (or whatever) when they all do it from the outside.
Honestly when is enough enough with this guy? I feel sorry for his poor kids having to put up with having that as a father. I can't imagine being so reckless with their lives, what a narcissist.
Many have been wondering why Francis Herbert White III, Attorney at Law, has been absent from Nick's cases as of late. I think I may know why, and no, it's not his back!
If you recall, on September 11th, 2024 (incidentally the same day Nick "graduated" "recovery"), Francis's son Thomas Francis White officially became Layla Marie White. Poor Francis was the attorney of record for the name change. Despite being gainfully employed and living rent-free with mom and dad, It seems that Layla has racked up a little bit of credit card debt. Despite Francis's best efforts, magic lawyer words couldn't make this problem go away.
Disclaimer: IANAL. If I misinterpreted or misrepresented anything, you are welcome to correct it. 82-CO-25-2280
Midland Credit Management, Inc vs Thomas F White
Conciliation
Filed 11/03/2025
Midland Credit Management, Inc. claimed that Layla, deadnamed in all filings as Thomas, defaulted on a Capital One Platinum MasterCard and owes a balance of $1,587.36 as well as $85 in filing fees.
Thomas/Layla was summoned to a zoom hearing and was a no-show.
Thus, in February of this year, a default judgment was handed down for Thomas/Layla to pay a rather small total of $1,672.36. The defendant was notified of the judgment as well as the deadline to appeal, 03/09/2026.
Which brings us to... 82-CV-26-1358
Midland Credit Management, Inc vs Thomas F White
Conciliation Appeal
Filed 03/09/2026
Right in time for the appeal deadline, Francis Herbert White III paid $425.00, which is more than 25% of the total amount owed by Thomas/Layla, to appeal the default judgment for the debt. Francis demanded that the court remove the case from Conciliation Court and move it to a jury trial in District Court. And HER name is LAYLA!
The judge said, LOL no, you didn't show up for your hearing. And actually you're too late according to Rule 521(b).
82-CV-26-1563
Midland Credit Management, Inc vs Thomas F White
Transcript Judgment
Filed 03/19/2026
Francis's intercession on behalf of his stunning and brave child was all for naught. An Identification Affidavit for a consumer credit contract is filed, and yet again, Layla has been deadnamed. We find out that Layla is gainfully employed at the Jiffy Lube and that those wages will sadly be garnished.
This brings up a few questions.
I don't know why the notice of judgment says the deadline to appeal is March 9th when the actual deadline under 521(b) is much shorter. Perhaps a lawyer can shed more light on this. This is why you don't file shit at the last minute, I guess.
This is less than $2k in credit card debt. Absolute peanuts compared to what some people rack up. Why not just pay it? Surely the Jiffy Lube pays at least $15/hour. Court filings show that Thomas/Layla lives at home with mom and dad. With such limited living expenses, this should be paid off in 2 months, no problem. But I guess ignoring it and skipping court was easier.
Why would Francis pay over 25% of the total debt owed in order to appeal a cut-and-dry default judgment over less than $2k? Why enable his child like this? What was his grand plan for the jury trial? "Your honor, the defendant has been repeatedly deadnamed! Midland Credit Management actually owes Layla one million dollars for intentional infliction of emotional distress!" *all the jurors stand up and start clapping*
Anyway... we can't be too hard on Francis Herbert White III. Seems like he's got enough on his plate!
Archivos adjuntos
MCRO_82-CV-26-1563_Affidavit of Increased Costs_2026-04-23_20260603155423.pdf
90.6 KB
· Vistas: 12
MCRO_82-CO-25-2280_Statement of Claim_2025-11-03_20260603155310.pdf
236.2 KB
· Vistas: 3
MCRO_82-CO-25-2280_Summons for Hearing_2025-11-18_20260603161955.pdf
957.4 KB
· Vistas: 3
MCRO_82-CO-25-2280_Notice of Filing of Order and Entry of Judgment_2026-02-11_20260603162250.pdf
100.6 KB
· Vistas: 4
MCRO_82-CV-26-1358_Demand for Removal or Appeal_2026-03-09_20260603162627.pdf
233.3 KB
· Vistas: 6
MCRO_82-CV-26-1358_Notice of Judicial Determination_2026-03-12_20260603154821.pdf
969.3 KB
· Vistas: 4
MCRO_82-CV-26-1563_Affidavit of Identification of Judgment Debtor_2026-03-19_20260603164023.pdf
I believe under MN the FOIA rules, the FD incident report (sans patient info) should be a public record and can be accessed via FOIA or in the courthouse @MNPublicRecords. I believe the EMS/Hospital report is unlikely to be a public record. Even if the EMS report is it is likely to be filled with redactions. The Fire report would likely be redacted partially, but would contain detail descriptions of the state of vehicles involved, and the layout and arrangement of the vehicles during the inital scene response.
The Fire Report won't have anything juicy. They are very bare bones for MVA's. Just check boxes and incident codes. FD isn't giving a detailed documentation of the scene. They will typically just list location, # of cars, # of patients, responding units and firefighters (by badge number. If you want names send a subpoena.) And any special remediation taken by the fire department. Ie Put out vehicle fire, tool extraction, etc. The Fire Department does not document or investigate the scene (unless its on fire). The Fire Report will have nothing that can be viewed as testimony regarding the actual accident. That's the Police and EMS's job. Fire Service MVA reports are deliberately engineered to be utterly useless to lawyers.
