New £50 bank note 'must recognise ethnic minorities'

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-46577975

Comedian Sanjeev Bhaskar and presenter Sandi Toksvig are among those calling for a historic figure from a black and ethnic minority background (BAME) to feature on the new £50 note.

The Bank of England last month asked the public to nominate a British scientist to feature on the note.

Campaigners say the chosen figure should recognise "the contribution of ethnic minorities" to British culture.

Crimean War nurse Mary Seacole is among their suggested candidates.

Another is wartime secret agent Noor Inayat Khan, the first female radio operator sent into Nazi-occupied France.

More than 200 people, including Lord Victor Adebowale and Baroness Sayeeda Warsi, signed the letter published in the Sunday Times.

"We do not lack candidates, and arguably their achievements were the greater for having been made at a time when many careers and were effectively closed to them, whether through colonial rules, racism, or the legacy of slavery," it states.

The letter also points out that "no-one from an ethnic minority has yet featured on a banknote" despite BAME communities representing "14% of the British population".

"Changing this would send a message that the contribution of ethnic minorities to Britain's history, culture and economy is recognised and valued," it reads.

"What better representation of 'global Britain' could there be?"

Late last month the Bank said it had received 174,112 nominations for the £50 portrait in less than four weeks.

It released a list of more than 800 eligible nominees, including Seacole along with computing pioneers Alan Turing and Ada Lovelace, telephone inventor Alexander Graham Bell and Stephen Hawking.

To be eligible, the individual must be real, deceased and have contributed to any field of science in the UK.

The final full list is yet to be released; nominations closed on Friday.

Wanda Wyporska, the Equality Trust executive director, said it was time "our black heroes and heroines" were recognised for their contribution to British society.

"Now more than ever, we need to celebrate the rich diversity of UK society: representation on bank notes is a great way to do this," she said.

Steam engine pioneers James Watt and Matthew Boulton appear on the current £50, issued in 2011.

Space scientist Maggie Aderin-Pocock, author and genetics expert Emily Grossman, and theoretical and particle physicist Simon Singh are among those responsible for drawing up a shortlist.

The final choice will be made by Bank of England governor Mark Carney in 2019.
 
Britian is legitimately a joke in many ways, from its people to its government.

To think this was less than 100 years ago is mind blowing:

large.png
 
Im for Richard 1. he was a famouse scientist who revolutionised the removing of kebab.

Literally; the enemies of Christendom that he Deus Vulted out of there were Turks.

I myself would say Margaret Thatcher as first choice because gender equality (Jane Austen is on the £10 and the £5 and the £20 are both men) and to cause screeching from lefties, and Stephen Hawking as second choice.
 
Poor Stephen Hawking, he was a cripple in a wheelchair who couldn't talk without significant assistance but even that doesn't stop him from being considered privileged by these people.

Let's be honest, if I had a bill with his face on it, I'd spend it just so I didn't have that face staring at me through my wallet.
 
*demands for more recognition of BAME contributions to science as these will 'obviously' be ignored by nasty shortlisting panel*

*2 of 3 shortlisting panel are BAME scientists*

:story:

I went for Turing anyway. The man was a war hero and we locked him up and tortured him. Fucking shameful.
 
I have no problem with this. I think it would be great if the UK and other countries like my own swayed more into putting scientists, engineers, civil rights leaders, and other private individuals who accomplished great things onto currency instead of mostly elder statesmen. I love my country and our constitution, but a great country doesn't stay great by always worshipping politicians. And I'll even cop that the western powers should recognize the contributions minority individuals made, both because they did so despite social and political handicaps in their era and because it is important to recognize those people were helping to build their homeland even in a time when they weren't recognized as equals.

I don't see a corollary between this and the liberal guilt opening everyone's anus to unfiltered immigration by people who don't contribute. When they want to put a nameless immigrant on the pound or dollar bill, I'll be the first one to complain. Banknotes should be adorned with specific great individuals. And frankly you shouldn't be eligible if my grandparents remember a time when you were in power, that's too soon for society to judge your historical worth with a cool head.
 
I have no problem with this. I think it would be great if the UK and other countries like my own swayed more into putting scientists, engineers, civil rights leaders, and other private individuals who accomplished great things onto currency instead of mostly elder statesmen. I love my country and our constitution, but a great country doesn't stay great by always worshipping politicians. And I'll even cop that the western powers should recognize the contributions minority individuals made, both because they did so despite social and political handicaps in their era and because it is important to recognize those people were helping to build their homeland even in a time when they weren't recognized as equals.

I don't see a corollary between this and the liberal guilt opening everyone's anus to unfiltered immigration by people who don't contribute. When they want to put a nameless immigrant on the pound or dollar bill, I'll be the first one to complain. Banknotes should be adorned with specific great individuals. And frankly you shouldn't be eligible if my grandparents remember a time when you were in power, that's too soon for society to judge your historical worth with a cool head.
We do get too attached to iconic things merely because they are iconic, and presidential heads on US coins and currency is a big one in the US. It's kind of sad, because for almost a century the US had incredibly beautiful coinage and bank notes. Beautiful, as in some of the designs being arguably the most beautiful coins ever minted in all of history, and there are some pretty standout banknotes as well. There's not much you can do with just a head (though the bas-relief Pratt-Bigelow gold coins are pretty stunning: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Head_gold_pieces). I can't think of a coin design anywhere, ever, that matches Augustus St. Gauden's art deco masterpiece that was his $20 gold coin, especially the earlier ones. Weinman's walking liberty half dollar and MacNeil's standing liberty quarter from the same era are pretty close, though.

We're kind of in the last gasps of physical money in much of the world, we should be going out with a bang. Interesting topics and a return to late 19th, early 20th century artistry.
 
I don't really care it's a totally empty gesture because our society is degenerating into Hell on earth for anyone one not in the upper classes, which means ethnic minorities are totally fucked.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo