Opinion Men, please ask yourself why so many women would rather parent alone

Article|Archive
Women be crazy! You know it, I know it! And now they’re at their madness again.

According to a new report by the Human Fertilisation and Embryo Authority (which has such a pleasingly dystopic ring about it, no?), the number of single ladies having in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or donor insemination (DI) treatment – in other words, taking delivery of the sperm without the man attached – has tripled in the last decade.

What are they thinking, choosing to go it alone? What selfishness is rampant here, what twisted mind would rather have a baby alone than with a man – or not at all?

Feminism has gone mad, morality and possibly God is dead, and we are all going to hell in a handcart thanks to these hordes of bonkers bints queuing up to get injected with a stranger’s swimmers instead of a husband’s, or at least a partner’s, or at least a real live penis. These are, surely, the end times.

I paraphrase – but not by much – the immediate storm of outrage online and in various newspapers that has greeted the new statistic. And as ever, I have stood very quietly, listening, hoping – sometimes even pressing my ear to the ground in case I can hear the faintest, distant rumble of its approach – for the arrival of what is always missing when we begin to debate/react furiously to these issues. Namely, this question: “Oh my God – what are men doing so terribly wrong that this extraordinary situation has come about?!”

I never hear it. Just occasionally I hear the rumble, but the train of thought always seems to get diverted somewhere before it arrives at a conclusion.

So let’s try it now. Let’s try… “OMG! Being pregnant, having a baby and raising a child is such hard, all-consuming work! What could be making women feel that this extraordinary feat of labour (pardon the pun) is less burdensome executed alone than within the traditional model of parenting? I note that the number of women in same-sex couples having fertility treatment has doubled in the same period and so, men – let the self-interrogation and cultural excoriation begin!”

No? Okay, I’ll start. And I’ll start from the position, using 50 years of experience as a woman and 30 years of watching my friends navigate, and of navigating myself, the path to wanted pregnancy, that most heterosexual women would prefer to have a baby with a man they love, trust, can depend on, and who willingly and naturally shares half the domestic chores with them already, will be just as egalitarian when a baby arrives and upends the established order of things, and will be a patient, engaged, loving father thereafter, balking at none of the unpleasant new chores involved or the astonishing number of bodily fluids leaking from both his wife and the new arrival at inopportune moments.

The number of times this happens is… not great. Large numbers of candidates fall away at every stage. There are those who don’t want children ever. There are those who don’t want children yet. There are those who say they don’t want children yet but actually don’t want children ever but stick around until their partner’s peak fertile years are behind her. They often leave then, find a younger partner and have children with her. It’s a cliché, but it’s a cliché because it happens so very, very often.

What the reasoning is behind it, I do not know – and again, it’s not my business to work out. It’s something men as a class should be required to be working out and then NOT DOING ANY MORE.

There are those who want children but who are still effectively children themselves – doing chores unwillingly, incompetently (sometimes genuinely, sometimes tactically so they don’t get asked again), or not at all, always needing to be reminded (“nagged”) even if they then do them willingly. Which is to say, never the initiative, which is also to say never taking full adult responsibility for their lives.

Then there those who want children, but don’t want to stay faithful to their wife/partner – before, during and/or after the pregnancy, which is often only discovered by said wife/partner when it’s too late to make a perfectly unfettered decision about whether you want to stay under these conditions or not.

And then there is the risk that your partner will reveal himself to be violent. It is a well-documented phenomenon that pregnancy is when domestic violence either begins or, if it already present, spikes. The former may be a small risk, but it is one of the many that sits with us, always, that needs to be factored into any decision we make and especially of the life-altering kind that will also bring a new, vulnerable tiny being into the world.

I’m not saying women are perfect – of course they are not, of course we aren’t. I’m saying that we are made aware of all our imperfections, all our failings, all our sins by friends, family, acquaintances, passing strangers, sociocultural messaging and outright public condemnations by the great and good at every turn. No real or perceived female transgression is too small to be attended to, I assure you. Meanwhile, men get away – often quite literally actually! – with murder.

Until men start doing the hard, necessary work on themselves individually and as a group to make women not just feel but actually be safer, happier and better with than without them, I’m afraid more and more of them are going to go it alone – not just when it comes to having children, but more generally in life too. Men are crazy to have let it get this far.
 
It's so obvious that even a caveman with no knowledge of things will figure it out within seconds;

-Full control of the child
-Sympathy from others
-Alimony and government assistance
 
It's interesting how the article assumes all women are rational actors and men are flawed and prone to mistake.

I do notice that it brings up doing chores around the house, and how men doing half of them is rare. I've had roommates of both sexes as well as girlfriends live with me, and my takeaway is that everyone is bad at keeping the kitchen clean. Are there tons of guys refusing to do dishes because that's chick shit? It seems overblown, but maybe I have too much faith in people.
 
It's interesting how the article assumes all women are rational actors and men are flawed and prone to mistake.

I do notice that it brings up doing chores around the house, and how men doing half of them is rare. I've had roommates of both sexes as well as girlfriends live with me, and my takeaway is that everyone is bad at keeping the kitchen clean. Are there tons of guys refusing to do dishes because that's chick shit? It seems overblown, but maybe I have too much faith in people.
If you've lived alone, you know the chore thing is complete bullshit. They're never that complicated and doing them all takes an hour at most if you have everything on hand and nearby. It's just overblown for women to farm more pity. Little better than "emotional labor."
 
I live in a country where except in rare and limited circumstances, and time limited to several years at that, no one gets any alimony. Child support is literally inadequate to cover the cost of child rearing, and in any case, the overwhelming majority of kids of divorce are in a shared custody arrangement so no child support is payable. So... it's not that.

It is well known and well researched that family breakdown is the number one cause of child poverty here, and even those families not in poverty are invariably negatively financially impacted by divorce.

And yet folks are getting divorced left right and centre.

Money can't be and isn't the only answer as to why family breakdown is widespread. People are clearly by their own testimony fucking miserable in many marriages, miserable enough that they will be skint in perpetuity and work two jobs rather than stick it out in the marriage. They will walk away from all the considerable (and they are considerable) financial advantages of remaining married and accept being broke as fuck, them and the kids both, just to get away from their spouse.

It would make sense to think carefully about how and why people are getting to that level of misery to see what, as a society and as individuals, people could do differently to actually make it work. I refuse to believe - because it's patently not true - that most people are strolling up the aisle expecting to get divorced, or indifferent as to whether the marriage succeeded. You get married (as an adult in a white country, certainly) expecting that it will work out and you will be reasonably happy and content together.

Something is going fucking wrong after that point. Badly wrong. It's not the same thing in every case, either, because although infidelity is sadly common, it's certainly not present in all or even a majority of marriage breakdowns. Not everyone is having terrible health problems, or addiction problems, or severe intractable money problems. Not every marriage that fails is violent, or sexually abusive. (Still, even one is one too many.) I suspect financial abuse is more common than we realise, but particularly further down the income scale, the income disparity between spouses falls enough that it can't all be about financial abuse.

There are many, many marriages that mostly just fall apart in one way and another, and eventually the parties just can't stand each other. It is not hard to think that there must be ways in which people could undertake to try harder/be nicer/put in more effort/synonym of your choice to prevent that happening.

What needs to be done to make people be less fucking miserable with the life partner they apparently chose? What's wrong with the way we are living that - if I have the right figures in mind - a majority of people who marry subsequently divorce?
 
Ps. I have witnessed this shit,

I have as well. I knew a girlboss who was quite high up at a well known global corporation, working in their European office. She hit a certain age, WHAM, she drops her job, moves back to her hometown in the midwestern US, adopts 3 negro children, and decides to be a stay at home mother. Her husband is a classic soy, beta cuck, so he just went along with the whole thing. It blew my fucking mind, and scared the crap out of me.

i've been the only man in an all female workplace

Ah, you know that special hell then.
 
I have as well. I knew a girlboss who was quite high up at a well known global corporation, working in their European office. She hit a certain age, WHAM, she drops her job, moves back to her hometown in the midwestern US, adopts 3 negro children, and decides to be a stay at home mother. Her husband is a classic soy, beta cuck, so he just went along with the whole thing. It blew my fucking mind, and scared the crap out of me.
you could make a horror movie out of this kind of thing and it would work
Ah, you know that special hell then.
It easily could've been worse, but I still got the fuck out of there as soon as it struck me how little that job was actually worth for everything else I had to deal with.
 
What's wrong with the way we are living that - if I have the right figures in mind - a majority of people who marry subsequently divorce?
I believe the stat is that something like half of marriages (or 45% or whatever) end in divorce. Which is very different from what's implied (half of people who marry get divorced), because people who get divorced often make a habit of it.

So, for example, if 75% of married people never divorce, 15% divorce twice, and 10% divorce three times, you'd have a 44% divorce rate (60/135 marriages, from 25/100 people).
 
Yes, because single mothers are known to consistently raise the most psychologically stable and productive members of society, right?


...right?
 
Most single moms absolutely hate being single moms. Most single moms are that way because the biggest sugar daddy of them all, Uncle Sam, gives them more money as single moms than if they were married or at least shacked up with the father. The amount of gibs they get disincentivizes getting married or cohabitating. So why do it? It never has anything to do with #girlboss shit and everything to do with the tens of thousands of dollars they get in gibs.
 
With the sheer amount of men trooning out exactly after they become fathers in the tranny threads, I can't judge women for wanting to raise children alone (even though a lot of troons are sons of single mothers themselves). It's a fatherhood crisis.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo