🍗 Deathfat Margaret Pless / idlediletante / Stan - Official Kiwi Farms Advertiser and Enthusiast Who Has Proudly Eaten Ass. Now Posting Her Tits to Own the Troons!

Thank you @pork and beans for the dung beetle Marge.
MIMG_0142.jpeg
(Thread)
 
See, Beauty Parlor does some good for women once in a while. At least when it benefits them.
:mad:

(I'd rather have done a gif for fun but I had my whole post which iirc contained actual comment deleted in some other thread the other day because it included a "reaction image." (:_()

And in case a site-created emoji is considered equally as offensive as a.gif, my comment is "oh, why must you go for such cheap criticism?". Which is at least as substantive as your comment. :)

I can add more if needed. :biggrin:

In peace and perspective,
FoD
 
You can always mine her awful takes from the King Hate thread.

Having awful takes just makes her like any other farmer.

Her need to overshare makes her a lolcow.

Her past makes her a journoscum wannabe.

Her lack of public retractions about the site makes her a hypocrite.

Having been born with a vagina and a uterus makes her a woman.

Her mouth makes her fat.
 
stanreport.PNG
A little ironic considering you were busy reporting all the posts on your profile and crying/gloating on lemmingwiser and paladinboos profile. Marge needs some pr spokesperson to help her with her constant hypocrisy, and the kind of rich kid entitlement that comes with having everything in life handed to you.
 
Same slop for months, been deconstructed and mocked a gorillion times, could not exist without hugbox protections, booooring.
Direct engagement, in the open for all to see-->best.
“come back here so we can make you feel bad again” you have a real weird flirt strategy
 
Why would you feel "bad"?
You're standing up for things you believe in, right?
Like progressivism, calling nasty Jews "kikes" and proving that one single woman can withstand a flood of MATI moids.
idk seems like there is standing up for things I believe in, and then there's arguing with Holocaust deniers, wannabe klansmen, avowed women-haters, """conservatives""" whose politics closely resemble that of Anders Breivik, and then there's people who post fanart of me as a dung beetle. I used to really think that leaving their insults unanswered was like letting them win, but I see now that certain discussions are beneath me. How am I going to convince a guy who's arguing with me in bad faith to begin with? I'm legitimizing them with my attention.
 
idk seems like there is standing up for things I believe in, and then there's arguing with Holocaust deniers, wannabe klansmen, avowed women-haters, """conservatives""" whose politics closely resemble that of Anders Breivik, and then there's people who post fanart of me as a dung beetle. I used to really think that leaving their insults unanswered was like letting them win, but I see now that certain discussions are beneath me. How am I going to convince a guy who's arguing with me in bad faith to begin with? I'm legitimizing them with my attention.
I assure you the other side often feels the same way. They think it's impossible to talk to feminists and progressives, that most LGBTQs if not all are grooming the children and have politics closely resembling those of Michel Foucault or likely worse, and that discussing with the leftoid biomass is below them. Especially when it's about "journalists", most of them being incredibly biased and doing hit jobs on people by purposefully omitting important context.
This shit won't end well. Sure discussions can be acrimonious, but that's to be expected when the two sides have so little in common.
And yet, discussion is literally the ONLY way forward that might result in an improved situation. You cannot get rid of rightoids, cannot get rid of chuds, faggots, progressives and feminists. Too many in each group.
 
Especially when it's about "journalists", most of them being incredibly biased and doing hit jobs on people by purposefully omitting important context.
I honestly think a pathological opposition to journalists on the basis of them being journalists portends something horrible for humanity and our ability to communicate with one another. But I also never claimed to be a trained journalist, so calling me one feels oddly reminiscent of those movies about the cultural revolution where professors would get beaten to death for counterrevolutionary activities.
This shit won't end well. Sure discussions can be acrimonious, but that's to be expected when the two sides have so little in common.
And yet, discussion is literally the ONLY way forward that might result in an improved situation. You cannot get rid of rightoids, cannot get rid of chuds, faggots, progressives and feminists. Too many in each group.
I still don't think I owe people who are drawing fanart of me as a dung beetle are worthy of much of my time. You, on the other hand...

Some of the BP girls do have a Discord, though.
Well you never invited me :( !
The men invite me to their Discords, what gives
 
I recall Marge semi-recently saying to a woman somewhere on the forums not to let any man tell you what you can't do, and to do it anyway to prove them wrong.

Well, Marge: you can't lose weight.
I honestly think a pathological opposition to journalists on the basis of them being journalists portends something horrible for humanity and our ability to communicate with one another.
I think college-educated professionals taking a paycheck from corps means they'll never stand for anything that jeopardizes that paycheck. I think unprincipled people who get paid to write their owners' propaganda (aka journos) portends disaster for humanity. WaPo will never bite Bezos' hand, etc. But that has nothing to do with communication, because journos are not trying to communicate; journos are paid liars trying to brainwash and proselytize their readers. Go eat something, fatty.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo