War Major US military deployment to Middle East - State Department hints Iran planned to attack US Embassy in Oman

USS Abraham Lincoln has transited through the Mediterranean at maximum speed according to rumors (they never do that), and the US is deploying B-52s. You rarely see an emergency deployment like this (Grab your duffle bag and be on the tarmac in 30 minutes or we leave your ass behind). Not posturing. Such deployments are immensely dangerous (and expensive).


B-52s added to aircraft carrier strike group rushing to Middle East to confront Iran threats
WASHINGTON – The Pentagon is rushing additional military muscle, including B-52 bombers, to the Middle East to counter Iranian threats to U.S. troops on the ground and at sea, the Pentagon announced Tuesday.

The announcement follows two days of increasing alarm over threats from Iran. National Security Advisor John Bolton said Sunday that the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier and bombers were being sent to the region. Meanwhile, senators from both parties urged the White House to move cautiously.

By Monday, Pentagon spokesman Charles Summers was pointing "to indications of heightened Iranian readiness to conduct offensive operations against U.S forces and our interests."


On Tuesday, the Pentagon fleshed out the nature of its response. The Air Force is dispatching B-52 bombers, long-range warplanes capable of carrying 70,000 pounds of bombs.

The Abraham Lincoln, which already was scheduled for deployment to the Persian Gulf region, is cutting short other port visits to arrive ahead of schedule. The aircraft carrier, with a wing of warplanes and 3,000 sailors aboard, is accompanied by the USS Leyte Gulf, a guided-missile cruiser, and four destroyers: the USS Bainbridge, Gonzalez, Mason and Nitze.

"U.S. Central Command continues to track a number of credible threat streams emanating from the regime in Iran throughout the CENTCOM area of responsibility," Navy Capt. Bill Urban, a Central Command spokesman, said in a statement.

The escalating tensions follow an announcement last month by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo of new sanctions against any country, including U.S. allies, that imports Iranian oil, the country's top source of income. The White House also designated the Revolutionary Guards Corps as a foreign terrorist organization, part of a hardening stance toward Iran.

Pompeo, who canceled a long-planned visit with Germany's Angela Merkel, made an unannounced stop in Baghdad instead on Tuesday to meet with the country’s intelligence and defense chiefs, among other officials. He said he wanted to discuss the new threats from Iran with Iraqi leaders.

"Iran is escalating their activity," Pompeo told reporters en route to Baghdad. "I wanted to go to Baghdad to speak with the leadership there, to assure them that we stood ready to continue to ensure that Iraq is a sovereign, independent nation."


Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky, warned against any U.S. military action against Iran.

“I think it’s very important that the administration know they do not have our permission to (engage in) … any kind of war or regime change operation in Iran.”

Asked if he is worried about Bolton pushing for military action, Paul said: “I think that the president’s instincts are good on this and hopefully he’ll listen to his inner voice.”

Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., in a statement, said the White House was being reckless in confronting Iran and lacked legal authority to start a conflict.

“I’m deeply worried that the Trump administration is leading us toward an unnecessary war with Iran," Kaine said.

To others, the deployment makes sense as a warning to Iran, said Michael O'Hanlon, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.

"I like the decision, to the extent I can understand the backdrop to it, because it tells Iran they won’t get away with doing something nasty by proxy," O'Hanlon said. "We are on to them. That may or may not suffice as deterrent, and we have to be careful about assuming that a carrier or bomber can stop a covert operative, but I still favor it – and I also favor reminding Iran that we aren’t really pivoting out of the Middle East too too dramatically, either."

More: President Trump moves to cut off Iran oil exports; decision could roil markets

There are thousands of U.S. troops in the region, many of them in Iraq, Iran's neighbor to the west. During the bloody insurgent war there, hundreds of U.S. troops were killed by weapons the Pentagon said were furnished by Iran.
 
Última edición:
This is about as "We politely request you reconsider" a deployment can get. If you think this will end up in a shooting war, remember that it wasn't too long ago Trump was openly tweeting "My nuclear button is bigger" at North Korea and nothing came of that either. Or that time US forces killed a bunch of Russians advancing on them in Syria.
 
Iran is a massive country with a population of 80 million people and very difficult terrain, that, plus the fact that an unprovoked invasion of a nation like Iran would absolutely bring in foreign powers like Russia and China makes this either an act of incredible stupidity or expensive posturing.
 
This is what I don't get. How does it benefit Iran to stick their dicks in the hornet's nest? I'm starting to think Israel is trying to trick us into fighting another one of their wars... again.

Iran is not a unitary state. There are numerous independent factions that make up their government. The Quds force in particular is nutbars enough to try and arrange an attack on a US embassy and consulate using regional proxies like the Houthi or the Mahdi Army. They would see it not just as a way to sending a message to the great satan but also to their own political enemies inside Iran.
 
Spitballing here, but could this possibly be Iran acting in conjunction with/in a 'proxy' capacity to China? They're pretty tight right now, from all accounts (oil makes the best lube) and Trump just flicked China's teeny tiny Asia peepees with those tariff. If so; bold strategy, China. I don't think Trump gives a shit about ROE like previous (cucked) administrations and he's not a retarded Hitleresque micro-manager like Obama was with his (cuck) 'wars'.

Also, seems like they're playing pretty coy about the Why's here, although they seem to have covered the other four Ws more or less. Usually the Why is the most important component of war-time propaganda so far as I can tell.

Academics: Please respond.

Also, God speed, soldiers.
:semperfidelis:
@Tard Baby Bitch I wish you would bomb the Parliament at least. The best thing that could happen to us is a good military dicking followed by voluntary/forced amalgamation with the U.S. of A.
 
The Quds force in particular is nutbars enough to try and arrange an attack on a US embassy and consulate using regional proxies like the Houthi or the Mahdi Army.
The Houthis have previously fired on US Navy ships, possibly more than once if I remember right. If anything comes out of this, it'll just be a little more... "support" in the proxy wars we've already got in Syria and Yemen.
 
Spitballing here, but could this possibly be Iran acting in conjunction with/in a 'proxy' capacity to China? They're pretty tight right now, from all accounts (oil makes the best lube) and Trump just flicked China's teeny tiny Asia peepees with those tariff. If so; bold strategy, China. I don't think Trump gives a shit about ROE like previous (cucked) administrations and he's not a exceptional Hitleresque micro-manager like Obama was with his (cuck) 'wars'.

Also, seems like they're playing pretty coy about the Why's here, although they seem to have covered the other four Ws more or less. Usually the Why is the most important component of war-time propaganda so far as I can tell.

Academics: Please respond.

Also, God speed, soldiers.
:semperfidelis:

@Tard Baby Bitch I wish you would bomb the Parliament at least. The best thing that could happen to us is a good military dicking followed by voluntary/forced amalgamation with the U.S. of A.

No chance. China is dependent on oil that comes through the straights of hormuz. If the US and Iran go at it hammer and tongs something close to 70% of their oil supply will be halted overnight
 
These nations aren't looking for war. The price of peace is at an all time low.

A mistake here will of course lead to war, but the intent is likely to get the wheels turning on sanctions relief/end to terrorist support/please say sorry senpai/election meddling. Like someone mentioned a bit earlier, there are a lot of internal factions at play on all sides. Everyone has an angle and wants their palm greased. And a few special individuals probably do want to start the end times.
 
Spitballing here, but could this possibly be Iran acting in conjunction with/in a 'proxy' capacity to China? They're pretty tight right now, from all accounts (oil makes the best lube) and Trump just flicked China's teeny tiny Asia peepees with those tariff. If so; bold strategy, China. I don't think Trump gives a shit about ROE like previous (cucked) administrations and he's not a exceptional Hitleresque micro-manager like Obama was with his (cuck) 'wars'.

Also, seems like they're playing pretty coy about the Why's here, although they seem to have covered the other four Ws more or less. Usually the Why is the most important component of war-time propaganda so far as I can tell.

Academics: Please respond.

Also, God speed, soldiers.
:semperfidelis:
It's more likely that it's something like @ColtWalker1847 said. We pretty much stopped giving support to jihadi's in Syria and the guys at al Tanf are just warm bodies we use to justify pipehitters hanging around. It could also be neocon big dick flexing or trying to provoke Iran into doing something.
The Houthis have previously fired on US Navy ships, possibly more than once if I remember right. If anything comes out of this, it'll just be a little more... "support" in the proxy wars we've already got in Syria and Yemen.
Yeah, I mean I hardly consider a missile or two provocation. That could easily be whatever retard that passes as HNIC at the launch site getting all retarded. Which is right up Quds alley of course.
 
THEY KNOW WHAT THEY DID!!!
750413

THEY'VE HAD IT TOO GOOD FOR TOO LONG!
 
Glassing the region has big upsides. Reduced population reduces global stresses, covering the area in solar panels would give cheap energy, no rapefugees if the are no people to come from the shit holes. I see no real downside.
 
Glassing the region has big upsides. Reduced population reduces global stresses, covering the area in solar panels would give cheap energy, no rapefugees if the are no people to come from the shit holes. I see no real downside.
Lol, kill people. I'm edgy. Jajaja. Gamers rise up. Autistic Illuminati
 
This is what I don't get. How does it benefit Iran to stick their dicks in the hornet's nest? I'm starting to think Israel is trying to trick us into fighting another one of their wars... again.
Well someone has to test if Trump is just a blowhard or if he's actually willing to push the big red button.
 
Well someone has to test if Trump is just a blowhard or if he's actually willing to push the big red button.
They also know the US general public doesn't have an appetite for foreign intervention right now, let alone in the fucking ME again. A contingent of Trump's base doubly so. With Venezuela getting hot this turns up pressure to get anti-interventionists to REEE.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo