But just a cover of a book doesn’t really prove anything. I haven’t read that book nor do I have a desire to but I don’t really understand how this disproves what I wrote. I found a Reddit thread of women discussing it and again the comments were mainly about how it was surprisingly well written or wholesome not about how sexy the descriptions of huge penises supposedly are.
'she' looks like john redcorn
It's a book about a woman that has to jerk off a massive minotaur penis, they're flicking the bean to it.
Maybe its to nudge women toward having that derangement.
Who the fuck is "they" in your scenario? The person who wrote that book is this fat lady.
Jews, mainly.
"monster bait"
I watched an interview with Thomas Rousseau, https://rumble.com/v7chykc-identity...most-censored-man-livestream-w-thomas-ro.html
Having a large penis is shameful as the evolutionary benefit of them is in their ability to scrape away the semen of other men already inside the vagina, increasing your chance at reproductive success. It is a sign of a promiscuous and polyandrous people. A micropenis is nobility par excellence. Infact, the gods do not have a penis at all. This is why trannies are all so stunning, brave and beautiful, they are made in God's image.
Hey as long as it isn't the one from Shrek 2 I'm fine with it. I do think the cwc one is funny
You actually believe what women say about themselves?
Yes much better to get information on what women are like from angry, sexless brown men.
You say this but you are sourcing reddit?
