- Registrado
- 1 de Abr, 2024
His website is where he has people paying for content. So that's 7,000 people paying to watch. The real numbers he will have are going to be spread across all the platforms other platforms he uses. YouTube is where he has millions, rumble is in the 100,000s. I can't see the numbers on spotify. I like that post says his views are spread out across quite a few platforms. I don't think anyone is actually thinking tucker Carlson's website is where the millions number comes from. Just like it wouldn't be the case for any of the other people doing what he does. If they have some streaming/video platform of their own, if people use it at all it's going to be some small number of people that aren't watching their stuff through the normal platforms everyone else uses, it's not going to be anywhere close the the majority of their viewership.Ver archivo adjunto 8953956
I've not verified this but it appears in his direct website he has this many if it is to be believed.
And really the only people that are paying for his site are probably ones like me that wanted to see something in particular he's paywalled. I was considering paying for a month to see the one he did about Netanyahu, but I didn't end up doing it. But it's probably people that were considering the same thing I was, or are really big fans/whales.
That said, if he is saying comparing the views spread among however many platforms he's using online isn't exactly apples to apples, I feel like the comparison he is trying to make, where it's only the paid content on his site is even more of a disengenuous comparison. Realistically you would have to do the math if you were going to actually try to see what it comes out to, and probably set some arbitrary cutoff time for the views on a video, because the way people consume online content just isn't the same as cable news. I think he would likely stack up with Fox.