💰 Grifter "Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
some more news from warner bros animation division: The Lineup
HLatajeW4AAYV7I.jpg
Bad Faries already sounds like a stinker, Being that its going to cast the black lady from wicked and the nigger doctor from Russell T. Davies & Disney/BBC's Doctor Who (if this is supposedly true from their side cast list)
Screenshot 2026-06-23 170811.png
other stuff includes a new daffy duck short (who knows how good this will be, I highly doubt it being good)
Screenshot 2026-06-23 170740.png
And once again: The Powerpuff Girls will get another theatrical movie.......
Screenshot 2026-06-23 170732.png
(Remember the first powerpuff girls movie: a movie that flopped in the box office in 2002, Better question: Remember the 2016 powerpuff girls reboot? the one that was pure dogshit and had a writer who wanted to fuck one of the powerpuff girls or something)
1782249300572.png
 
Another real id commitment for lawsuit drop by roblox
Screenshot_20260623_175847_X.jpg
No legislation. 🚫No committee hearings. 🚫No public debate.

Just an agreement between the state's top cop and the tech company and you've got age verification (digital ID) and government mandated controls - blocking interactions, no nighttime notifications, etc.

Parents no longer get to decide. Government is here to parent.

This isn't to say that these aren't good guardrails for children, but it is not for the government to set the guardrails and put every minor into that framework. A 12 year old and a 17 year old are very different and parents should have the flexibility to treat them as such.

We are going to see more mandates through legal agreements like this. Florida is on deck right now.
 
Another real id commitment for lawsuit drop by roblox
Ver archivo adjunto 9184566
This isn't to say that these aren't good guardrails for children, but it is not for the government to set the guardrails and put every minor into that framework. A 12 year old and a 17 year old are very different and parents should have the flexibility to treat them as such.
I mean, if adults want middle-aged predators to be able to talk to their 16 or 17-year old, they can just create an adult account, verify using their ID, and hand it over to the kid. it's not like this prevents kids from talking to each other. the only people mad about this are the ppl who want an uninterrupted supply of victims. if roblox had done any meaningful self-regulation on this to keep kids safe it wouldn't be happening this way.
 
Última edición:
Josh I have a recommendation for the intro song on Friday.

Alan Greenspan is dead.

He coined the phrase "irrational exuberance" and subsequently was featured in a cameo in Irrational Exuberance (Yatta).

There will never be another more relevant opportunity to play this, this is our last chance.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=JBJtQjykq_4
This screams something you would want a 12 year old to see before you start explaining how jew run everything and it's just 8 megacorps before you introduce him to Mr. Robot.
Also, why was Colin Mochrie such a good meme?
 
I mean, if adults want middle-aged predators to be able to talk to their 16 or 17-year old, they can just create an adult account, verify using their ID, and hand it over to the kid. it's not like this prevents kids from talking to each other. the only people mad about this are the ppl who want an uninterrupted supply of victims. if roblox had done any meaningful self-regulation on this to keep kids safe it wouldn't be happening this way.
I am one of the people concerned about this and I have never used Roblox in my life

It is just one more step toward everything you do on the Internet being connected to a digital ID and never being able to say or do anything without it being linked directly to you in real life.

There's not really a good solution, or at least not one that any current lawmaker understands. The better answer would be stronger device-side restriction ability, but we're never going to get that, because protecting children isn't the point of these bills- pressuring and regulating companies into being a proxy for governmental control and speech regulation is the ultimate point.

When it's not just Roblox, it's everywhere on the Internet, everything you do or say, will you still shrug and say 'meh' about it?
 
It is just one more step toward everything you do on the Internet being connected to a digital ID and never being able to say or do anything without it being linked directly to you in real life.
You are already being tracked and monitored on the commercial internet by adtech companies and state actors. The ID thing is good because it just forces people to realize they are being monitored on major sites. The answer is to embrace open source and decentralized solutions and build infrastructure where you aren't being monitored, not demand unfettered access to minors on Roblox, it's a losing issue. Better to be legislating things like double-blind age verification servers run by state DMVs so you can age check without giving up your identity rather than fight the age check itself.
 
Better to be legislating things like double-blind age verification servers run by state DMVs so you can age check without giving up your identity rather than fight the age check itself.
This is literally giving up your identity to the state in order to be able to use the Internet and if you legitimately think having to provide your state-issued ID to use every website out there would not be directly connected to all your online activity I don't think you really grasp the goal of all this legislation. It's not about the kids. It's about control.

I understand the need for a way to keep creepy pedos away from kids on Roblox but I reject the 'you're already being monitored so just give up and bend over' mentality.
 
I mean, if adults want middle-aged predators to be able to talk to their 16 or 17-year old, they can just create an adult account, verify using their ID, and hand it over to the kid. it's not like this prevents kids from talking to each other. the only people mad about this are the ppl who want an uninterrupted supply of victims. if roblox had done any meaningful self-regulation on this to keep kids safe it wouldn't be happening this way.
Like the other guy said: it's never been about protecting kids. The end goal is that the System has ALL information about you. If you say something the System doesn't like, you'll banned not from a single site or service, but from the Internet in general and/or phone networks.

This post is from April. tl;dr - if you want to use a SIM card in Mexico, you have to give the government an iris scan, a fingerprint and "facial data" (could be more than just a picture like in your driver's license).
 
I have an edit request for this MATI clip:

I find the audio very humorous and I sometimes post it as a reaction video in the same vein as Terry Davis clips, but I think the video part of it is kind lacking. Would anyone be so creative as to make a drawing or short animation to compliment Null seething at computer issues here? Obviously Chantal and Kiwi branding should be retained, it's just that the plain thread image is kind of out of place when using it for reactions
 
Atrás
Top Abajo