Lolbertarian Cringe - A place to post libertarians saying crazy shit

[Delany's Donkey]

we'll start off with some classic 2016 Libertarian Convention Highlights

Lolberts want a mascot

0:26

on Drivers licenses

0:22

Booing the idea of prosecuting drug dealers selling heroin to toddlers

0:27

"Drugs should be as legal as tomatoes"

1:01

he's that kind of libertarian

1:46

boo having borders!

0:15

doing the dance of his people

1:30

 

[Hunter Hearst Helmsley]

Authoritarians are retards. Quote me.

 

[Breadbassket]

The Ron Paul Pokemon song was pretty good.

 

[dick brain]

You rang?

 

[Broadside]

Authoritarians are retards. Quote me.

The average person is a fucking retard. Authoritarianism is the only solution to a prosperous society.

 

[ShahOfIran1979]

There's a funny old image on ED of a neckbeard wearing a shirt of Reagan and showing off his Doom collection. Sadly, the website seems to be down right now, I'm not sure for how long.

 

[Donald_J_Trump]

Authoritarians are retards. Quote me.

Unless they are White.

 

[WelperHelper99]

Just ask a libertarian the age of consent question. They are nor a serious party

 

[Soso]

The Ron Paul Pokemon song was pretty good.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=guLEUhIgRAI

I miss this sort of cringe, not the insidious things we see now.

 

[Nod Flenders]

It's no wonder why the Lolbertarian Party is not taken seriously.

 

[XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG]

Why is anyone taking the Libertarian Party seriously?
It's an oxymoron, it has no reason to exist
It's like a pacifist serial killer

Either way, libertarianism is an ethical/legal position, and so far nobody has made any coherent refutation, yet even a rebuttal or retort that's coherent and stands up to scrutiny

 

[Long Dong Silver 2025]

I'm not sure using the PARTY of libertarianism is a good start. The party has long since been made a giant joke, and my conspiracy - mind says it's because they can't have anyone who disrupts the balance of left vs. right.

 

[Delany's Donkey]

I'm not sure using the PARTY of libertarianism is a good start. The party has long since been made a giant joke, and my conspiracy - mind says it's because they can't have anyone who disrupts the balance of left vs. right.

how about Rand Paul and other lolberts pearl clutching about killing cartel members trying to poison Americans?

Rand's post
other's post

 

[888Flux]

Unless they are White.

The only way any of these systems will work, be it free market libertarianism or socialism, is for a state to have a shared ethos through both racial and cultural means. That is the only way ANY set of ideas can work in practice. This is an objective fact of reality.

Even full blown Communism would work. Would it be the best system? Probably not, but it would still function as to the benefit of people in relationship to governance.

The modern concept of "politics" existing in a vaccum as "ideas" independent of a people is something relegated to only the past century. Nationalism was the default operating system for all of human history.

The erosion of this fundamental truth is why every Western country has turned into a niggercattle feedlot and only benefits the top 1%.

 

[Donald_J_Trump]

The erosion of this fundamental truth is why every Western country has turned into a niggercattle feedlot and only benefits the top 1%.

Jews are that 1%. Never forget Hitler did nothing wrong.

 

[Jason_Cruiser]

It's rare for trump to be the smartest in the room, but he's right. With no boarders the entire population of the turd-world would just some to a America and with-in a few decades once they are the ethnic majority they will vote for the same shitty culture that made their country a shithole in the first place. I have no idea how libertarians expect to counter that. People are selfish and the majority of whites not seeing race is the exception. People will vote for what's best for their own people even if it infringes on the rights of others.

how about Rand Paul and other lolberts pearl clutching about killing cartel members trying to poison Americans?

Libertarians will always lose if they keep this up. No-one want's to live in a society where teen drug addicts can drive around in cars wielding a AKs with no restrictions. People vote what will keep them safe, even if it means less rights, how do you think most dictators get into power.

 

[XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG]

With no boarders

The libertarian position is that nobody may "immigrate" without the landowner's consent

 

[Long Dong Silver 2025]

Ver archivo adjunto 7994744Ver archivo adjunto 7994766

how about Rand Paul and other lolberts pearl clutching about killing cartel members trying to poison Americans?

Rand's post
other's post

I'm not sure exactly what you are getting at. So because Rand says something about this specific situation, it means libertarianism is incorrect? I disagree mind you, but I don't think I quite get what you are saying.

 

[Delany's Donkey]

I'm not sure exactly what you are getting at. So because Rand says something about this specific situation, it means libertarianism is incorrect? I disagree mind you, but I don't think I quite get what you are saying.

this is a thread for posting examples of lolbertarians saying insane and dumb shit and making fun of them for being retards. it's not a thread dedicated to destroying the philosophy of libertarianism.

unfortunately, as long as there are teenagers and autistic pot heads there will always be libertarians.

 

[Jason_Cruiser]

The libertarian position is that nobody may "immigrate" without the landowner's consent

How does that end up working at a nation level? At that point countries would stop existing and it'd be just millions of tiny tribal nations. In the long run you are just going to end up countries again once people start forming pacts and then taking over other peoples land. The more I look at this belief system I start thinking it's just an idealized romanticization of the wild-west.