RU LGBT ‘propaganda’ faces complete ban in Russia

A new bill compares the promotion of “non-traditional sexual relations” with war propaganda and inciting national, racial or religious hatred.

The promotion of LGBT relations could be permanently banned in Russia under a bill introduced to the State Duma on Monday, which likens such messaging to war propaganda and incitement of hatred.

Currently, LGBT ‘propaganda’ in Russia is only banned when directed at children, but some politicians have been calling for harsher restrictions and punishments for the “denial of family values” and “propaganda of non-traditional sexual relations.”

In an explanatory note attached to the bill, the authors argue that LGBT ‘propaganda’ has become widespread in Russia and is being promoted through the media, public events, streaming services and through the depiction of such relationships in films.

“In Russia, at the legislative level, it is not allowed to promote suicide, drugs, extremism, criminal behavior, as they are considered negative and socially dangerous phenomena. At the same time, formally, until now, there is no ban on propaganda of the denial of family values and non-traditional sexual relations, including with the use of film distribution,” the note reads.

The authors of the bill – who do not include members of the ruling United Russia party – claim the denial of family as a social value, promotion of so-called “childfree” lifestyles, and the approval and recognition of non-traditional sexual relations, is dangerous not only for children and young people, but for society as a whole, since it “puts the issues of demography and future economic growth at risk.”

The bill seeks to supplement current legislation by introducing administrative and criminal responsibility for spreading LGBT messaging across any demographic in the Russian Federation and to deny distribution rights to films that promote such relations.

“Family, motherhood and childhood in their traditional understanding, taken from the ancestors, are the values that ensure the continuous change of generations,” urge the authors of the bill, adding that they are a “condition for the preservation and development of the multinational people of the Russian Federation, and therefore need special protection from the state.”

The lawmakers note that the prohibition of LGBT propaganda does not deprive Russian citizens of the opportunity and right to determine their sexual preference and orientation, nor does it allow for their discrimination in any way. However, they insist that these privileges “do not give them the right to seek public approval of such relations” or “disseminate ‘new’ values that carry hidden threats to society.”

Last month, a similar bill was also introduced to the State Duma, seeking to introduce fines of over $160,000 for promoting non-traditional sexual relations. However, it failed to pass its first reading.

Article
 
Ver archivo adjunto 3503640
(Putin's voice) "Based? I guess you can call it that."

> The authors of the bill – who do not include members of the ruling United Russia party

Not until it passes, and probably not even then. So far it looks like a faggy attempt to hand the issue to kooks and freaks in the parliament and stain the anti-groomer cause by association. The existing anti-groomer law does not work. This summer, a faggot headlined the school honor graduate ball in Moscow (for 15 year olds). Cops do not go after groomers, because that would compromise pro-groomer officials. When a lolsuit actually reaches the court, the "experts" turn out to be groomers, too ("the protagonist of this song is kissing a child 'under her clothes', what of it? they're really close friends"). There's an even older anti-gang law, that one doesn't work either - need I say more than "rap"? Until Putin orders cops to enforce laws, nothing will change; and if he were going to, he'd have United Russia take credit for it.
 
Ahhh yes, the land where sodomy in the context of dedovshchina is considered totally not LGBTQ+.
I guess this law is about 'propaganda' so this law cannot be used to punish blatant queer acts in the armed forces.
 
Russia is trying to be all family friendly and 'think of the youth' while simultaneously having a huge problem with alcoholism and drug use. Maybe do something about all the kids on krokodil before you worry about what's on tv.
 
I feel like people who are anti-censorship will forget that this is censorship too…
Censoring journalism is dangerous whether on the right or the left.
>Censoring journalism is dangerous whether on the right or the left
Censoring journalism is based whether right or left, because journalists are mostly Jews.
If I had to choose between these two without an option for free speech, I'd rather go with this. Also pushing pedoshit on kids is objectionable and goes beyond free speech.
That's kind of the cold reality that liberalism likes to ignore. You don't really have the option of just saying "everyone should be free!" At the end of the day, the dominant group gets freedom, and the inferior group gets slavery, and nothing can actually change that.
 
What the fuck I love my government now?!!!
Oh no, how will Russian kids ever... *checks notes* ...get confused about which bathroom to use?
The one with pigs on the door belongs to you-know-who. Other than that, we have signs and letters on the doors so nah, there will be no confusion, but mass hysteria shall you pick the wrong one. :suffering:


yeah, sure. Russia is totally Not Gay.

Ver archivo adjunto 3503762
Oh don't be jealous, sweetie.
I feel like people who are anti-censorship will forget that this is censorship too…
Censoring journalism is dangerous whether on the right or the left.
Judging by your pfp you're certainly have a brain damage so my question I wanted to ask would be rhetorical and not significant to post. :suffering:

Journalism is the media…
Journalism is being retarded niggercattle glownigger whore. Shut up.

orry to double post but adding to my above point, labelling things the government doesn’t like or believe in as ‘propaganda’ is a dangerous route because it’s really not about gay people, it’s about what that line of thinking implies. If people are not allowed to express what they want to via media, art, or movies, I would argue that is more of an issue than the existence of the LGBT, or any other group in the first place.
Question: would you like get your children groomed or\and molested\raped through aformentioned media, art and movies, along with by pedophiles in schools (quite a spicy topic in U.S. today, right?)? Or you'd prefer to have a certainty that your child will not be groomed or molested\raped by any of these?
Your dad did not rape you because he was gay, he did it because he was Russian.
I'll make "debate user RandomTwitterGuy and his pedophilia showing up" thread in your name. :suffering:
 
The sponsor is more demented than Biden. This is 100% Putin's attempt to look good to the Westoid "young specialist" (programmer socks) faction.
 
Homosexuality is a mental illness. Most gay men are paedophiles. The promotion of homosexuality should be proscribed in the west. Section 28, which was repealed in the UK in 2003, should be reinstated.
 
Wow you guys are really out of touch and sucking that Russian cock
Yes, because this is totally not happening in America right now.
1657726445741.jpg
 
Serious question what the hell does LGBT propaganda mean in practice? Is it just a positive depiction of a homosexual person?
The criminal code of the Russian Federation identifies it as follows:

Active public activities to disseminate information aimed at shaping attitudes or stereotypes in order to form an attractive image of non-traditional sexual orientation, as well as to encourage certain actions in minors.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo