Culture LGBT issues should be taught in every subject, campaign group says

https://sneed.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/FYlvzFEOh4PsjyyNYdl9ow--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTY0MDtoPTQyNi43MDgzMTcwNjM2NDcwMw--/https://sneed.yimg.com/uu/api/res/1.2/EQVP84vuMSijHlrEHYIM4A--~B/aD0zNDE1O3c9NTEyMjtzbT0xO2FwcGlkPXl0YWNoeW9u/https://media-mbst-pub-ue1.s3.amazonaws.com/creatr-images/2019-12/51448c80-1444-11ea-9cba-199d28fe1900
Campaign group Stonewall suggested teaching LGBT issues in every subject. (Getty)
Children as young as five could be taught about LGBT issues in every subject under plans proposed by a campaign group.

Rights group Stonewall believes teachers should tell children about lesbian, gay and transgender issues in classes such as Maths and Design.


According to The Times, Stonewall suggests that same-sex couples be used to teach children to count in maths lessons, with possible questions including: “How many biscuits are left at Fatima and Shanika’s wedding?”

In design and technology lessons, Stonewall says teachers should use the rainbow flag to help 5 to 7-year-olds understand the meaning of colours.

https://sneed.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/q6RzRvTyc4vMAH30obKj6g--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTY0MDtoPTQyNi42NjY2NjY2NjY2NjY3/https://media-mbst-pub-ue1.s3.amazonaws.com/creatr-images/2019-12/4722bfa0-1445-11ea-be8e-412e35119b07It comes after a judge banned parents from protesting LGBT education outside a school in Birmingham. (Getty)
In computer science, Stonewall suggests pupils could design a dress for Bailey, a boy who dreams of being a girl and is the main character in a picture book called 10,000 Dresses.

Stonewall’s guidance has been sponsored by the publisher Pearson and the Government Equalities Office (GEO) from a £1m grant awarded to LGBT organisations.

The group said: “Our new guide, Creating an LGBT-Inclusive Primary Curriculum, is a free voluntary resource for primary school teachers who want to make their classrooms inclusive and accepting of all young people.”

READ MORE FROM YAHOO NEWS UK:
No 10 to explore other routes towards election after Lib Dem proposal
Environmental ‘cheat devices’ fitted to thousands of ships could render UK ports unusable
Sajid Javid's budget delay only adds to the turmoil over Brexit

It comes just a week after a judge permanently banned parents from demonstrating against LGBT education outside a primary school in Birmingham.

The ban, handed down at the High Court in Birmingham on Tuesday, includes an exclusion zone surrounding the city’s Anderton Park Primary School.

The Department for Education and the city council also welcomed the judge’s decision.

The legal bid had been opposed by protesters, along with an interim ban first granted at the same court in the summer.
—————


No way this is going to backfire! Kids love being told and constantly reminded what to do. This will also sit well with minorities, since it will clearly be inclusive and culturally sensitive.
 
With what are you fighting back? Plastic forks?
Plastic forks are banned because they pollute the oceans. We have paper spoons now. And paper plates. They're going to ban them next month because they cause trees to disappear, so then I guess we'll be back to using trenchers and our hands to eat. I tell you though, you can put a pretty nasty bruise on someone with that lump of hard bread. It'll be banned in february.

Fighting back doesn't automatically imply bombs and shit. I'm not here to powerlevel, but let me suggest that if I were involved for any amount of time in any serious effort to reverse the direction my country has taken, the last place I would be posting detailed information about it would be on a forum so heavily monitored by glow-in-the-darks that it's visible from space.
 
the last place I would be posting detailed information about it would be on a forum so heavily monitored by glow-in-the-darks that it's visible from space.
True, but you would be posting "hypothetical" how-to's and manuals via other means on other sites.
 
Yeah, a big no on the "never talk about LGBT stuff in school reeeee" argument.

I grew up when Section 28 was still in force. This was a law that prevented schools doing anything that could contribute to the "promotion of homosexuality" or "promote the teaching in any maintained school of the acceptability of homosexuality as a pretended family relationship".

Section 28 was fucking bullshit. Schools were not allowed to teach that hey, some families do indeed have same sex parents, that same sex relationships existed, and most importantly, they were not allowed in the most cringeworthy parts of sex education to give the important safety advice about the stuff you need to do differently if you are having sex with someone of your own gender. LGB (we hadn't added the T yet) support groups in schools were disbanded for fear they contravened Section 28. Teachers who were having completely legal and settled same sex relationships weren't allowed to talk about them in school.

Pretending that gay people didn't exist didn't stop kids of my generation growing up to be gay anyway. What it did do was cut us off from any line of exterior school-based pastoral support at a difficult time when lots of folk my age did not grow up with accepting parents and families. It contributed to the enormous bullshit load of shame that in the eighties and nineties was still being fired at young gay people.

Bullshit to that. No return to Section 28. No Outsiders is a bullshit programme but Section 28 was worse.
Yes. Let's teach children about men fucking other men. THEY ARE CHILDREN. LEAVE THEM ALONE.
 
I'm a little astonished that when push comes to shove trannies come before Muslims. It'll be interesting to see how that pans out for the Anglos once the caliphate is expanded to the British Isles.
It is getting closer and closer in the UK I think. They just need enough bodies to be a reliable voting bloc. Then suddenly all the complaining about how abrahamic religions persecute the gays will disappear from the politicians' platforms and the media's news sites overnight.


Talking about LGBT (political) issues in a math class won't go wrong at all.

As of 2019, 40% of transgender individuals in the United States commit suicide. If there are 200,000 known transgenders in the United States, about how many of them are likely to commit suicide?

Bonus: 5% of transgenders identify as persons of color. How many PoC transgenders are there?
They really should. HIV transmission rates, suicide rates, child molestation rates, domestic violence rates, etc. Install hatred of queers in children as young as possible, fucking based.

LGBT math can't be any worse than common core.

25% of all black trans women have aids, whereas only .3% of the general population has aids. Bottoming yields a 1.38% (one in 72 chance) of getting aids from an infected partner, while topping yields a 0.11% (one in 909 chance) of getting aids from an infected partner. Assuming that trans women are bottoms 90% of the time, what is the average partner count of a black trans woman?
The entire reason they claim math is oppressive and enforced by "the patriarchy" is a smokescreen to prevent people from hearing facts that threaten the narrative. That they'll never be willing to talk about these facts is proof.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo