🐱 Let’s Talk About Why It’s Time For a Non-Binary Revolution at the Movies

CatParty

Here’s the plain and simple truth: We need a non-binary revolution at the movies. Look, I spent a good 30 minutes debating how to begin this discussion with you, but screw it, I’m coming in hot. I’m a non-binary person who happens to love the heck out of movies (dare I say, I’m a cinephile?) and I’m saying this now, during Pride Month, because I know it’s what I and those who identify as such deserve.


Non-binary folks exist. This just needs to be stated right off the top because, if you’re going to come with me on this ride, you need to understand this. There is nothing scary or troubling or weird about being non-binary. Similarly, there is nothing scary or troubling, or weird about identifying as agender, genderqueer, genderfluid, gender non-conforming, or any other gender identity outside the traditional male/female binary. There’s lots of us who’ve been brave enough to come forward and speak about our identity who just so happen to be famous: Cara Delevingne (Carnival Row), Indya Moore (Pose), Brigette Lundy-Paine (Bill & Ted Face the Music), Lachlan Watson (Chilling Adventures of Sabrina), Jill Soloway (Transparent), Amandla Stenberg (The Eddy), and Ezra Miller (Justice League). We are here and we’re existing and we’re talking about who we are.

For as long as there have been movies, the subject of queerness and the people living gloriously queer lives have been depicted onscreen to varying degrees of candor (and varying degrees of success). Whether that queerness is overt or implied, we can generally see the roots of queer cinema dating back to the late 19th or early 20th centuries. Now, depending on when you check in with queer cinema over the course of the last 100 or so years, you can expect movies to basically mirror the attitudes of their times. As you can probably guess, a majority of those attitudes are less than progressive.

But those attitudes, in all of their shades, have often presented gender as it intersects with sexuality in a fairly binary manner. No matter which corner of the LGBTQ spectrum you place yourself, if you’re a character in a movie then chances are good you are male or female. You present as one of those two genders. You use he/him or she/her pronouns. Even with the major progressive leaps forward queer cinema has made in the last decade or so, the gender binary remains intact, which means little space and screentime is dedicated to depicting non-binary characters in an honest, accurate, and sensitive manner. Even today, in a time where we as a society are more openly discussing what it means to be non-binary and all of the shades of the non-binary identity, cinema is failing to put us onscreen at a rate consistent with other LGBTQ characters. This is not to chastise creators for putting the latter onscreen, either. Instead, I mention this merely to highlight queer cinema and, more generally, cinema overall needs to step it up and even the playing field.


I couldn’t tell you right now of any current movie, at any stage of the production process, which includes a non-binary character or focuses on the life of a non-binary person. Sure, there are performers, directors, writers, and folks across various positions in the movie industry who identify outside the gender binary, but are we putting characters like them on screen in a meaningful way? Television is lapping movies in this regard. I can name a number of shows which have featured non-binary characters and, in some cases, take time to explain what a particular character’s non-binary/agender/genderfluid/genderqueer identity means to them. From Steven Universe to She-Ra and the Princesses of Power to Good Omens, The Good Place, Younger, Vida, and most recently Zoey’s Extraordinary Playlist, television is helping bring visibility to those who identify outside of the male/female gender binary by giving characters a place, voice, and fleshed-out arc with more traits than just their gender identity to help them tell their story. This is what we desperately need in movies.

On the flip side, I can count the number of non-binary characters in movies on one hand. On the more problematic side of this group, you have Benedict Cumberbatch‘s All from Zoolander 2. All’s androgyne/non-binary identity is very obviously played for laughs, with Owen Wilson‘s Hansel asking very invasive and rude questions about All’s genitalia. (To this, I can only groan.) On other side, where non-binary characters are given a much fairer and positive shake, you have Asia Kate Dillon as The Adjudicator in John Wick: Chapter 3 – Parabellum and Kai Bradley as Jaime in Upgrade. Dillon requested their John Wick character be canonically non-binary within the John Wick universe and, true to this request, The Adjudicator moves through the world of Parabellum with their gender identity recognized, accepted, and it’s implied all characters they interact with understand how to use their pronouns appropriately. For Bradley’s Upgrade character, Jamie, they boldly state they do not have a gender and Jaime is not their real name upon crossing paths with the movie’s protagonist played by Logan Marshall-Green.

In addition to these three characters, there a handful of non-binary characters depicted in lesser-known indie works: Moises Arias plays an agender character in 2013’s Kings of Summer; Kaitlyn Alexander plays a non-binary character named S. LaFontaine in The Carmilla Movie, a feature adaptation of a Canadian webseries; Rhys Fehrenbacher’s J in the 2017 indie They is a trans teen who, in one scene, describes feeling sometimes male, sometimes female, and sometimes neither gender. But this, to date, is it. Six characters we can point to in movies who have spoken aloud their gender identity and whose pronouns (and/or other aspects of their identity) have been acknowledged onscreen.



“But, Allie, why does it matter?” you may be asking. “Doesn’t this recent emergence of non-binary characters kinda make sense since people have only recently begun identifying as non-binary?” Nope! Non-binary folks have existed since the dawn of time, baby, and the gender-neutral pronouns we often use have been around for damn near the same amount of time. Yes, in the actual world, throughout time and all across this great globe, people have identified as non-binary. So, to have a majority of art forms bringing in the perspectives of folks who identify outside of the male/female binary — including contemporary ones like video games, comic books, and yes, TV — but movies still lagging behind for some reason, it’s only right to ask for the industry to step up and become conscientious about the stories that are being greenlit and the characters populating those stories.
If movies are meant to be an extension of or mirror to the world we exist in on a daily basis, then how could it be anything less than expected that I would call for better non-binary representation onscreen? This is a reality. This is my lived reality. This is the lived reality of so, so many people and we come to the table with a variety of experiences related to our non-binary identity — a fundamental part of who we are. The real kicker (and you’ll find this is the case with many folks who aren’t cis, straight, white, and/or male) is that my experience as a non-binary person is not the same as the next non-binary, agender, genderfluid, genderqueer, or other gender non-conforming person you meet.
It is not just about our pronouns or how we present or how we speak or how we move throughout the world. It’s about putting characters like us, in all our many different non-binary forms, onscreen so we can see our lived experiences depicted on screen. To bring non-binary characters into the cinematic medium in a meaningful, overt, visible way is to destigmatize and celebrate us. Like I said before: Non-binary folks are here and we exist. It would be nice if movies recognized that, too.
 
I haven't read the article yet but since it's about non-binary let me guess...

The article's author is a woman, lily white with short hair, almost surely in her 20/30s who likes wearing baggy clothes.


Eh, close enough.

White.
NB.

Bitch, you're on the bottom of the totem pole atm. Didn't you get the memo?
Criminal niggers are at the top. VERY top. Your month got cancelled. Which means you're cancelled. You must now wash the blood covered feet of the nigger.
If the niggers get their way, you're never going to have a movie about you ever again.

It will all be tales of Wakanda. TRANS WOMAN WAKANDA.
 
Any article with "Let's Talk," "We Need to Have a Discussion," "Deal With It" or "Get Over It" in the headline is going to be awful.
Let's Talk about why We Need to Have a Discussion and You Need to Deal With It and Get Over It.
by
Schlomo Kikensteinbergenwitzenkrantz

Do any of you actually read these articles in full or does your mind shut off when you see the title? Personally I go quasi-comatose when I'm subjected to the author's tone.
1) You act like the authors put any thought into these articles
2) It's not like it's worth reading past the title. In fact, by reading the article, I'm losing time I could be using to mock sexual deviants with mental issues and emotionally distant parents who did a shitty job raising them.
 
No no no, let US talk about how you've realised you're not special but reacted in totally the wrong way.
 
"Let's talk about..."
Nah!
everytime we try to talk about something, you screech and reee.
so we're not talking about everything
bye bitch
Don't forget anytime they want to "Start a conversation" that inevitably results in the subject of their bitching shoving their idiocy in their face. Cue wave of "muh bigotry" articles.
 
Am I the only one who remembers old, classic, pulp sci-fi? Gender was a common idea to mess around with with aliens and the future and shit, but gender politics wasn’t really the point of that.
Gender didn’t used to be political. The idea of gender is obviously something that’s very intrinsic to the human condition, so there’s obviously a lot to explore, especially in sci-fi/fantasy settings where you can touch on ACTUAL non-binary gender/reproductive cycles that are completely alien to our own, as a way to examine the human concept of gender from an outside perspective.

The problem is it’s now #currentyear so anything related to gender MUST relate to #currentyear gender politics.
 
Why would the entertainment industry want to cater to them when they know that these goons change their terminology so frequently that the film/show they produced will be considered an irredeemable hate crime by the time it’s released?
 
Why would the entertainment industry want to cater to them when they know that these goons change their terminology so frequently that the film/show they produced will be considered an irredeemable hate crime by the time it’s released?

These people can't even grasp this idea.

They do not understand why a studio would rather make $150 million in profit off a movie that doesn't mention gender instead of teasing the warm fuzzies out of a few deluded people while losing that same amount with the latest woke reboot that nobody watched... they don't GET that media, to exist, has to make money... or if they do, don't see why they can't just blow the occasional nine-figure expense to do the "right" thing and virtue signal.

In fact, WB, Sony, Fox, etc. all have the moral imperative in current year to do so, what's more important, after all? YOUR Money and viability of YOUR industry, or, MY tribe and my feelings??!

Money to them is as big a social construct as gender... a flimsy excuse for why utopia didnt' get here yesterday... not a "real" thing.

EVERYONE BUT ME ISN'T LIVING RIGHT! REEEEEEEEE!
 
Última edición:
Come on you guys I say let the nonbinaries have their time at the movies. It's not like anybody is going there anyway so the attention starvation will kill them. They get what they want, we get what we want. 🚬

A human can never truly be nonbinary without looking like an eldrich abomination, which they don't want because who goes to the movies to face reality? It's just another evolution for women who "aren't like other girls" (and men so they can creep on said women).
 
Do any of you actually read these articles in full or does your mind shut off when you see the title? Personally I go quasi-comatose when I'm subjected to the author's tone.
I'll generally read the first sentence/paragraph, the last sentence/paragraph, and look at the address of the websites it's from. I can't be bothered to read a 1,300+ word article promoting mental illness being championed in media.
 
On other side, where non-binary characters are given a much fairer and positive shake, you have Asia Kate Dillon as The Adjudicator in John Wick: Chapter 3 – Parabellum

Missed this entirely, assuming it was actually there and not some kind of Tumblr headcanon.

edit: Maybe I'll have to re-watch? Looks like it got trolled by Lawrence Fishburne calling it "dear" and "baby," perhaps? This is a positive shake? FWIW, I only saw that as a woman with short hair, wearing dangly earrings and (I think) high heels . How 2005 of me, I guess. 🤷🏼‍♂️

 
Última edición:
I cannot imagine how stressful it must be to wake up every morning and have to decide your gender.
I just wake up and decide what pair of shoes look best with my pants, and that is more than enough for me.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo