Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….
- Iniciador del tema Random Internet Person
- Fecha de inicio
-
🚨 DDoS attack. Tor is stable: https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion/.
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack). -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Estado
- Registrado
- 26 de Sep, 2017
- Registrado
- 22 de Sep, 2014
Because it's what democracy looks like.
- Registrado
- 31 de Dic, 2018
They're blanking out the obviously offensive ones but I'm guessing they didn't do that for all of them because they didn't get the references hahaha
- Registrado
- 13 de Abr, 2019
- Registrado
- 25 de Mayo, 2020
Tech Illiterate rulers can't silence the people in the digital age
- Registrado
- 8 de Abr, 2018
The real question is why are they being showed in the first place? I'm still holding out for the defense having some kind of plan but man...
- Registrado
- 26 de Sep, 2017
What is bad for Kyle about these videos.
- Registrado
- 24 de Jun, 2020
Nothing in this footage incriminates Kyle. And how can they blame Kyle for superchats of OTHER PEOPLE?
If the jury falls for that, Kyle never had a chance.
If the jury falls for that, Kyle never had a chance.
- Registrado
- 17 de Jun, 2019
Keep in mind the Jury is random public idiots so any random thing unrelated to the actual issue that is being put on trial here of self defense could bias them even if they are told not to take it in consideration because people are unbelievably stupid.
- Registrado
- 13 de Jul, 2019
why is law enforcement sucking the prosecutions dick when they're representing the scum that was demanding they be beheaded and killed? in fact the source of the fucking riots was them, and the targets of aggression.
- Registrado
- 5 de Nov, 2020
I mean we're talking about video evidence and despite the campaign we're seeing a judge who is actually making sure they don't try to make the case a media circus like the chauvin trial. And internet sleuths are the reason Kyle rittenhouse isn't rotting behind bars. Internet sleuths are why were even talking about this case. If not for internet sleuths Kyle rittenhouse would have never had donations he would have been railroaded and we would be saying to ourselves the approved corporate media lines.
- Registrado
- 25 de Mayo, 2020
Pretty sure anyone with more than 2 braincells and born withint the last 50 years would be able to figure out those where internet randoms and unrelated to the case. Then again OJ Simpson walked free
I am the Muffin Maker
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 18 de Jul, 2019
Judge could order a mistrial.
At mid trial judge could find that the prosecution hasn't made out it's case beyond a preponderance of the evidence and give a judgement of acquittal.
Judges don't like to do that.
- Registrado
- 8 de Abr, 2018
I agree with you but why is the prosecution even showing them? What's their aim? Why is the defense not even asking for relevance or objecting to Binger essentially telling the witness what his testimony is?
- Registrado
- 1 de Sep, 2019
"mr soandso, were those comments on the video sent from my client? do you know who did it?"
- Registrado
- 31 de Dic, 2018
Regg was always somehow right in the thick of it during the riots so it makes sense that they would use his video but the fact that they didn't edit out his superchats which were basically /pol/ commentary has my sides in orbit.
- Registrado
- 26 de Sep, 2017
OJ walked free because the prosecution was braindead and asked him to do the glove shit
- Estado