Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votos: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votos: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votos: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votos: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votos: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votos: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votos: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votos: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votos: 35 1.1%

  • Total de votantes
    3,199
  • Encuesta cerrada .
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
I'm just amazed the trial didn't end when Binger implied Kyle was guilty for invoking the 5th amendment. What an absolutely insane thing to say.
Judge did say that he wanted the trial to be decisive to leave no doubt to the american public, so he probably wants it to run its course to make sure to everybody that the state is literally making shit up to incriminate Kyle
 
Honestly hate the prosecution's lawyer, he just stinks of dishonesty.
How much of the trial have you watched out of interest? Because he has been nothing but dishonest, from having obviously coached witnesses, to a defence witness giving testimony that he tried to coerce him to alter his statement, to violating Kyle's 5th Amendment right, to trying to backdoor another argument that was agreed pre-trial to not be discussed without clearing it with the court.

Man is the personification of every negative stereotype of lawyers, minus him charging up the ass because he's working for the state.
 
That counts for a lot. Kyle held his own and maintained his story without the defense popping up to screech Objection! Every other minute. Kyle was a fantastic witness. He was a child being bullied by an unhinged and incompetent prosecutor.
exactly. Thats what the jury will take from that snoozefest ..."This kid is saying the same shit over and over and Binger won't stop. Fuck him"
 
Had someone I know mock Kyle for crying on the stand.

Asked them: You know what it's like to take a human life?

The answer: Of course not, I'm not a piece of shit.

Ever wanted to slap someone so bad it would knock down their grandmother in her kitchen in 1922?
 
Jesus christ, I almost agree with the exceptional individual chimps who say fuck the law. Disregarding the boomer take from the defense this glowing little finger lookalike fucker is just such a massive piece of shit.

Edit: typo corrected.
 
Even if Apple fills in nothing when you pinch and zoom, compression fucks with a video. They are trying to argue the angle of a black smudge that is a tiny nat on the screen. Compression algorithms fuck with that hard. No ai even needed. Just basic fucking compression fucks this. Compression takes images and changes pixels so similar ones are grouped together.

Fixating on AI can fuck them. Demand the raw file if they want to zoom. Don't have a raw then fuck off.
 
I just love how Binger at the same time argues that it's a feature that's in common use and that works in a way that is common knowledge, yet says Richards is not qualified to comment on. Which is it, faggot? Is it common kowledge or do you need to be an expert?

Also "it's a feature used by many people regularly" is not an argument. I won't care if my cute cat pic will misplace a whisker in a weird way due to the AI enhancement fucking up, but when I'm standing trial for a murder, I do have a vested interest to make sure that the footage is accurate, untempered and some AI doesn't insert something that looks like a Hitler salute or me doing the makarena on the corpse of a child rapist, ffs.
 
Just how many chances is the judge going to give the prosecution at this point. We're well beyond the basic 3 strikes and your out concept introduced earlier.

As good as this judge has been, he needs to start setting actual hard limits. It's becoming rather unfair for the defense to keep giving the prosecution all these slaps on the wrists.
 
If the juror is looking at a zoomed in image and trying to make inferences based on it they should ensure they are using the nearest neighbor algorithm
Even nearest neighbor is still a distortion as the original image viewed at its original size is not blocky. Sometimes you can see odd things in a nearest-neighbor upscaled image that you wouldn't see even in the original image even if you put your eye right up next to it. If the image can not be altered, then no resizing algorithm can be used.
 
Binger was wanting to do a "zoom and enhance" thing to try to show Kyle lifting his rifle and aiming it before the chase happened which could invalidate the self-defense argument bur the judge says they'd need to bring in an expert talk about the validity of it.
If they had something that good, they would've shown it in evidence during the state's case.
 
How much of the trial have you watched out of interest? Because he has been nothing but dishonest, from having obviously coached witnesses, to a defence witness giving testimony that he tried to coerce him to alter his statement, to violating Kyle's 5th Amendment right, to trying to backdoor another argument that was agreed pre-trial to not be discussed without clearing it with the court.

Man is the personification of every negative stereotype of lawyers, minus him charging up the ass because he's working for the state.
the prosecutor should change his name to Ian Brandon Anderson
because he is not being true, and he is not being honest.
 
Had someone I know mock Kyle for crying on the stand.

Asked them: You know what it's like to take a human life?

The answer: Of course not, I'm not a piece of shit.

Ever wanted to slap someone so bad it would knock down their grandmother in her kitchen in 1922?
Again, it's all about moving the ideology forward. It has nothing to do with this particular case or the evidence.
 
Had someone I know mock Kyle for crying on the stand.

Asked them: You know what it's like to take a human life?

The answer: Of course not, I'm not a piece of shit.

Ever wanted to slap someone so bad it would knock down their grandmother in her kitchen in 1922?
I assume they voted Biden so they by proxy are responsible for the death of children killed by drones under Biden and Obama.

And by their logic, both are pieces of shit as well as Hillary Clinton also.
 
Dudes pardon the autism but just got back from a "work break' and the livestream seems to be paused.

What up?
It's that time of the day again
5285go.jpg
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo