I have a feeling that he was a legit bully all his life with little or no power and the anti fascism (or more like his anti fascism) is another excuse for his tantrums, nothing more. He isn't standing up to anyone or for anyone.
I remember him once twitting some virtual signaling faggorty to BLM while simultaneously admitting to not going out in person to show support because he was scared. Cowardice is his default position in life the irony is if Kyle had lived during the 30's in Germany, he'd been the guy who shut his curtains when the Gestapo took his Jewish neighbors.
Kyle always looks like he'd crap himself every time he hears a noise louder than a door knock.
The arthouse connaisseur watched Der Untergang, one of the most esteemed recent German-language movies, in the fucking English dub. I have no words other than KEK.
Not E-Rod, he had a wife who loved him, a paying job in the film industry (low-level but still paid work), and offline friends (cringy friends, but friends nonetheless). E-Rod unironically had and likely still has a far better life than Kyle. It's that dire.
Phew, those grapes sure are sour. And the Drinker is not just a successful reviewer, he's also a published author. Where's Kyle's great novel? He is so good at writing snarky tweets, he must have something amazing in the works!
Drinker is no doubt crying into his Toilet Duck about the money from his 1.35M subs on YouTube, a number managed in the last two years alone. His reviews are decent because they actually talk about the value of a good story wrt audience entertainment instead of lens flairs or bi-lighting or whatever the fuck. He was an author before turning to YT and it shows when he's talking about plot/character development or lack thereof. He also has a wife, kids, dog and enough friends/acquaintances to keep up a weekly livestream for even more revenue. Kyle has exactly none of those things despite being an internet critic for 5x as long. Seethe, Kyle.
I don't know about a bully because he strikes me as a soft boi. No, he reminds me as the kind who wanted to be the bully but instead he was the one that was picked on.
And depression. He did a whole thing once about how he's fought with depression his entire life.
Oh he's trying to be clever! Isn't that so stupid?
A lesson on pseudoscience, from the man with pronouns in his bio.
I was talking more about his youtube career than anything else where I think he's still under 30K subscribers and even when on TGWTG was considered the bottom of the barrel.
If only he had a tragic backstory that could explain everything. JK, His family zoom chat video essay revealed that his brother and parents are perfectly normal and he's the kind of fuck up that had everything handed to him. (as a child at least)
It's the feminists, finally come to cut off what he calls a penis for the crime of still being a man.
Joke's on them - Jordain claimed his cock & balls years ago and turned them into a lovely pair of earrings and a necklace.
Heinlein was pretty woke... for the time he lived in. I mean he wrote strong female characters, who have been criticized as being men with tits and a vagina. He never spoke poorly about other races going as far as to reveal, at the end of Starship Troopers, that Johnny Rico was actually Juan Rico from the Philippines. His views on race can be summed up in the following quote:
The man was a definite weirdo. That's not even up for debate. But to say he's problematic because his politics don't mesh with today's enlightened world is stupid. To people like that I always say you need to separate the artist from the art. He might have been a terrible person in real life but he wrote some amazing novels. I might not agree with his views on certain things but that would never stop me from reading his works. Hell if it was possible I'd love to meet the man for a coffee, or scotch if he would have preferred, and just discuss things with him.
Oh God, Lazarus Long strikes again. Yeah that was pretty fucked up.
The fact that it was directed by Paul Verhoeven who is very much a satirist in his own right should be the first clue that the movie and the book are two different things. The problem is that Paul tends to be not the "ha ha" funny kind of satirist. And so people looked at the movie as if it was somehow to be taken at face value. You know, like Robocop which is another movie which is satirizing something. Yes they both work as mindless action movies but c'mon the symbolism and allegories in Robocop alone ought to clue some people in that there's more going on behind the scenes than just a robot punching bad guys.
This is why I love Verhoeven so much. Most of his films like Robocop, Troopers, Total Recall, and even Showgirls are fantastic satire that some people are too stubborn or stupid to notice.
