Ted's Cabin
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 6 de Sep, 2024
He'd also have to show the crimes are sufficiently similar and there's precedent to show that the Canadian courts didn't consider "kidnapping" and Ohio's "child stealing" laws to be too similar.By pleading guilty in an Ontario courthouse to Canadian charges of unauthorized use of a computer and mischief to data, Kirt's legal team is essentially locking the door on extradition.
US Charges (as best as I could find reported by journo-scum)
Cottle has been charged with unlawfully transferring, possessing, or using a means of identification with the intent to commit, or aid or abet, or in connection with, unlawful activity under state or federal law. If convicted, he faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison.
Canada Charges
Ghiassi said in an email that Cottle pleaded guilty in a Newmarket, Ont., courthouse to the unauthorized use of a computer, mischief to computer data, and failure to comply with a release order.
Some of these are clearly different charges even if they're for the same "act", which wouldn't even violate the double jeopardy principle in Canada even if they were going to honor it. That was decided by their supreme court in "Canada v. Schmidt" in 1987. They also established that a target country doesn't have to honor Canadian law to be able to extradite someone.