I would agree if this was a family member or a friend we were talking about. With a paypig or john you view them as beneath you. It's how a scammer would view their mark: they deserve to lose the money for being stupid. It's not narcissistic as much as a disdain for a certain type of person.
Epic autobiography nigga
But the version of yourself who accepts the money is themselves beneath the version of yourself who wouldn't. To my mind, at least. I get that others could have wholly distinct values systems operating off completely different paradigms. I am a crazy person, so I'm not reflective of the normal viewpoint on these things.
Hey, let's not ask about your dirty whore past; let's ask about your dirty whore future!
I have seen a lot of findoms, admittedly biased because I only see shit when they get talked about and that's normally for something negative, but I have seen a lot that just are cunts. Not in a degrading sexual way, just a cunt. There are a lot of people that see paypigs as just easy marks. Not people with a fetish and a mutally sexual exchange but just a way to siphon easy money from people. There are certainly a lot of narcissists that feel entitled to the paypig money from what I've seen.
I would not turn down a gift from a family member.
They are not beneath you. They are sexually submissive. That does not make them a lesser person. Scamming someone because you believe you are 'better' or 'entitled' to their money is the exact logic jeets use. Whether you would personally pay for something or not does not change that a person paid for a service that they did not receive properly. They are not 'stupid' or 'losing' money. They are sending it to someone with the conscious expectation of a specific type of service to be provided.
There are two kinds of paypigs. While some paypigs want to be humiliated for the fact that they are gifting money (which is the service they are paying for), others don't want anything in return and just want to jerk off alone to the fact that they gave someone money afterwards. I was talking purely about the latter ones, that is what makes them "easy marks" in the eyes of others. As for the former ones there is an exchange of services that takes place and I respect that fact. I always believed that the latter were the majority but if that's not the case that's my bad.
Every prostitute/escort/camwhore/pornstar sees their clients as marks (at least at the start). It only feels sexual on the side of the john, but it feels purely clinical for the provider. I imagine it's just the same shit for findoms.
Where? I don't see that.
Someone wanking over randomly sending money isn't findom though. Maybe it is more prevalent than findom but it's entirely personal so it'd be hard to say. But findom and as a result paypigs rely on the dom part, findom without domination isn't findom and you cannot have domination without some sort of interaction and so the person isn't a paypig. The person wanking over gifting money is simply just not a paypig. I don't know the name and admittedly have never heard of it before but paypig is specifically a findom term.
I've just seen more people wanking over gifting money than "real findom" (while being called paypigs) and and that was my impression of the entire fetish. I had no idea they were separate things, mb.
Junkie4junkie relationship
Is this someone's fetish or just an indian/autist?
straight up fetish as far as I have heard because they actually sent a finished photo after the artist complied.
Because you already read about it
Why would that ever be attractive, nigga looks like an ogre.
I'm going to tell it to you as straight as possible, it really doesn't matter. Quite literally anything not illegal is in the range of social and relational acceptability, there's someone out there who likes the same thing as you. The only time I could see you genuinely getting ostracized for a fetish is if it was pedophilia or beastiality, as much as people like to mock and chant "Total (blank)fag death" and call anything outside of appreciation of boobs and abs "degen", deep down. Deep DEEP down. No one actually cares.
He posted about it elsewhere; it was a haircutting fetish.
Honestly I am just confused. What an interesting fetish. Kinda funny to see that seemingly every fucking fetish there is has the same dogshit indian memes about it. I have seen the exact same sort of nonsensical memes about some other shit ages ago that I can't remember. And it was also some wack shit that I'd never heard of before too.
That's already a thing. Indians were given Internet by the people at Google, Facebook, and Apple to access all of the pornography their rapey heart desires.
